Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Interpreting "Or": The Disjunctive Mandate for Personal Hearing in Tax Matters
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Registration Process u/s 80G: Insights from the ITAT Ruling
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Ensuring Fair Proceedings: The Importance of Proper Notice Service in Income Tax Matters
    Demarcating Authority: High Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Limits of GST Officers
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Unraveling the Royalty Conundrum and DTAA: ITAT's Stance on Marketing and Reservation Fees
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Royalty or Not? Decoding the Taxability of Marketing and Reservation Contributions under India-USA D...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Unraveling the Intricacies: Assessing a Political Party's Claim for Income Tax Exemption
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Bogus Capital Gains and Accommodation Entries: Unraveling the Penny Stock Scam and Tax Evasion
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Strict Interpretation of Exemption Provisions: Supreme Court's Ruling on Section 10B(8) of the Incom...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance u/s 14A: Prospective or Retrospective Effect of the Amendment?
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Complexities of "Charitable Purpose" in Income Tax Exemptions
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Cooperative Banks vs. Primary Agricultural Credit Societies: Implications for Section 80P Deduction
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Exemption u/s 11: Condonation of Delay in Filing Form 10
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting Section 249(4)(b) of the Income Tax Act: When Non-Payment of Advance Tax Cannot Dismiss...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Retrospective Amendments and the Doctrine of Vested Rights: A Judicial Perspective
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Upholding Equality: HC Strikes Down Discriminatory Circular on Charitable Trust Approvals
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Judicial Review of Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) Orders: Navigating the Boundaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Assessee's Lackadaisical Conduct Leads to Dismissal of Income Tax Appeal
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Faceless Appeal Scheme: Lessons from the Judgement on Delayed Filing and Deduction u/...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Unraveling the Maze of Round-Tripping: The Doctrine of "Source of Source" in Share Capital Transacti...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Personal hearing mandate in tax proceedings: failure to afford hearing requires reconsideration and a reasoned decision.
    Section 75(4) of the UPGST Act mandates that an opportunity for personal hearing be granted either upon a written request by the person chargeable with tax or penalty or whenever an adverse decision is contemplated; the disjunctive word "or" must be given its plain meaning, creating independent triggers for the hearing obligation. The court concluded the authorities failed to comply with this requirement and directed that a personal hearing be afforded and a reasoned order issued thereafter to ensure procedural fairness in tax adjudication.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Section 80G registration: provisional approval permits subsequent final registration, with commencement dated from provisional grant.
    The tribunal construed the proviso-based registration mechanism to permit institutions granted provisional approval to apply for final registration, counting the date of commencement of activities from the grant of provisional approval; administrative circulars extending renewal deadlines apply to specified renewal applications and do not curtail the availability of final registration for provisionally approved institutions, while a view excluding applicants who commenced activities prior to provisional approval was considered inconsistent with the proviso scheme.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Proper service of notice: portal-only publication cannot substitute direct communication and mandates a fresh hearing.
    Proper service of notice in income tax proceedings is essential to safeguard the right to be heard and facets of natural justice. Placing notices on an electronic portal without direct communication does not, by itself, satisfy statutory methods of service, and cannot be presumed to give the taxpayer effective notice. Where service in terms of the Act and Rules is not shown, affected parties are entitled to a fair opportunity to file replies and be heard, and the tax administration must provide a fresh hearing and issue an independent speaking order after considering the reply.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Jurisdictional limits of GST officers: no proceedings against assessees assigned to counterpart authority absent cross-empowerment notification.
    The judgement clarifies that appointment and delegation of powers under the Central and State GST regimes are confined to officers appointed under each statute, and that assessees allocated administratively to Central or State authorities may be lawfully proceeded against only by those authorities unless a formal cross-empowerment notification permits otherwise; no general cross-empowerment notification exists except for limited refund purposes.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Taxability of marketing contributions: non taxable where receipts are fiduciary and subject to mutuality, not royalty.
    Where receipts from hotels are received with a corresponding obligation to expend them for agreed common purposes and are held in a fiduciary capacity, such marketing contributions, reward program receipts, reservation contributions and central reservation system fees are not consideration for use of intellectual property or fees for technical services and thus do not qualify as royalty or fees for included services under the India-US DTAA, particularly in the absence of a permanent establishment and where coordinate precedent on identical facts supports non taxability under the principle of mutuality.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Royalty characterization: marketing and reservation contributions treated as non-royalty under DTAA when tied to agreed-use obligations.
    Whether marketing and reservation contributions from Indian hotels to a US company qualify as Royalty or Fees for Included Services under the India-USA DTAA turns on their substantive nature: the presence of a corresponding contractual obligation to apply funds for agreed marketing, advertising and reservation activities and supporting auditor evidence indicates such receipts are not consideration for making available intellectual property or technical services, distinguishing them from factual scenarios where contributions increase brand value or transfer intangible know how.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Section 13A compliance: failure to meet proviso conditions bars political party exemption and informs stay assessment approach.
    A registered political party's claim of exemption under Section 13A was rejected for failure to meet proviso conditions, including receipt of donations in breach of the cash donation prohibition; the tribunal treated non exempt voluntary contributions as income from other sources, disallowing deductions; allegations of mala fides were dismissed due to the party's procedural delays; and the tribunal's prima facie framework for stay applications-assessing merits, undue hardship, and likelihood of success-was upheld, with liberty to apply afresh to the tribunal given changed circumstances.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Burden of Proof under section sixty eight: genuineness of share transactions must be established or treated as accommodation entries.
    The dispute concerned alleged bogus long term capital gains from penny stock trading characterised as an accommodation entry; revenue contested genuineness, identity and creditworthiness of parties while assessees relied on expert and market information. Applying the doctrine of preponderance of probabilities, the court reiterated that the initial burden to prove identity and genuineness lies with the assessee, criticised inadequate enquiries by authorities, rejected expert and media reliance as a substitute for due diligence, and described the accommodation entry modus operandi leading to findings that the transactions were not satisfactorily proved.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Strict compliance with exemption conditions: declaration and filing deadline mandatory; revised returns cannot introduce new exemption claims.
    The Court held that both conditions for claiming the exemption-furnishing a written declaration to the assessing officer and submitting it before the due date for the original return-are mandatory and must be strictly complied with. It rejected treating the time limit as directory, distinguished deduction-related authorities, and held that a revised return cannot introduce new exemption claims or claim carry-forward benefits not made in the original return.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Retrospectivity of tax amendment: amendment held prospective; prior rule barring disallowance where no exempt income applies.
    The court held that the Finance Act amendment described as "for removal of doubts" cannot be given retrospective effect where it alters prior law; the Finance Bill memorandum fixing commencement determined prospectivity, and existing Division Bench precedent that no disallowance can be made if no exempt income was earned was applied, subject to the ultimate outcome of the pending higher court challenge.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Charitable purpose clarified: statutory public bodies generally exempt; commercial receipts taxed under quantitative proviso, with annual scrutiny required.
    The judgement narrows the scope of charitable purpose under Section 2(15) by treating statutory public utility bodies as generally exempt while excluding income from commercial activities beyond core regulatory or public-interest functions. Trade-promotion and non-statutory bodies may qualify if charges are nominal, but ancillary fee-generating services and high-fee providers produce taxable commercial receipts. Private trusts' advertisement income is commercial. Assessing authorities must perform yearly scrutiny and apply the proviso's quantitative limits to determine exemption eligibility.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deduction 80P eligibility turns on whether a cooperative society's banking status classifies it as a cooperative bank; AO to verify.
    A cooperative society carrying on deposit-taking and lending, issuing cheques and providing banking services may fall within the banking business definition under the Banking Regulation Act; whether it qualifies as a cooperative bank under that Act-affected by its bye-laws and membership rules-must be determined by fact-specific examination to decide entitlement to the cooperative deduction.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Condonation of Delay in Filing Form Ten: reasonable professional oversight accepted, delay condoned and rectification allowed.
    Condonation of delay in filing Form Ten was granted where the auditor's bona fide oversight-reporting accumulation in the audit report (Form Ten B) and misconstruing separate filing requirements-led to a 361 day delay; the court found the lapse inadvertent amid pandemic conditions, accepted the explanation, quashed the refusal order and permitted rectification steps, treating the delay as condoned.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Advance tax obligation: absence of taxable income prevents dismissal of appeal for non-payment of advance tax.
    The Tribunal held that the advance tax payment condition for appeal maintainability applies only when the assessee had a legal obligation to compute and pay advance tax; in the absence of taxable income no such obligation exists, and an appeal cannot be dismissed solely for non-payment of advance tax. The Tribunal directed that the matter proceed to merits with an opportunity to be heard, stressing that the payment requirement must be applied in light of factual circumstances.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Vested rights preserved against retrospective tax amendments; filings made before enactment remain effective for settlement consideration.
    The court addressed whether a retrospective Finance Act amendment prohibiting settlement applications from a specified date could divest a taxpayer who filed earlier of its vested right to have the application considered. It held that retrospective legislation cannot take away rights already accrued by actions completed before enactment unless clearly intended; that section 119 confers time-extension power but cannot impose new substantive eligibility conditions; and that administrative delay by revenue does not justify denying access where an application was already filed.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Reasonable classification principle: differential deadline for charitable trust tax recognition cannot lack rational basis or equality protection.
    A departmental circular extended a filing deadline for tax recognition to mitigate hardship but excluded newly formed charitable trusts without offering reasons; the exclusion lacked an intelligible differentia and rational nexus to the circular's object, making the differential treatment arbitrary and ultra vires the constitutional guarantee of equality, requiring the excluded applications to be treated as within time and decided on merits.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ITSC jurisdiction extends beyond application disclosures, while full and true disclosure and narrow judicial review govern settlement oversight.
    The Income Tax Settlement Commission may inquire into and decide issues disclosed in the application and any other matters relating to the case as reflected in the Commissioner's report or uncovered by further inquiry; full and true disclosure is mandatory and amendments or contradictory positions that undermine that requirement are impermissible, yet contesting taxability before the Commission does not automatically negate disclosure; judicial review is limited to statutory contravention, prejudice, fraud, bias or malice, while sufficiency of materials placed before the Commission is generally beyond routine court scrutiny.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Delay condonation denied where litigant's evasive conduct and non participation failed to constitute sufficient cause for appeal filing.
    The court refused condonation of delay for filing an appeal where a best judgment assessment treated cash bank deposits as unexplained after the assessee failed to file returns or participate in proceedings; reliance on transition to a faceless e filing regime and lack of alerts was held insufficient, as the assessee's evasive and habitual non participation did not amount to sufficient cause warranting condonation under the applicable doctrine.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Sufficient cause for delay in filing appeals rejected where faceless scheme migration did not excuse prolonged inaction.
    The court held that migration to a faceless appeal system did not, without persuasive evidence, constitute sufficient cause to condone a lengthy delay in filing an appeal, finding the explanation reflective of litigant inaction rather than unavoidable impediment. On tax deduction, the court applied authority that a non-obstante clause does not negate the employer's obligation to deposit employees' statutory contributions by the due date as a condition for claiming the deduction, and treated the appeal as meritless and barred by limitation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Source of source doctrine used to pierce the corporate veil where share capital appears round tripped among related entities.
    The assessee must prove identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of investors under section 68; examination extends to the true origin of funds where bank records show circular transfers, related party directorships, lack of business operations, and arbitrary share premium, permitting lifting the corporate veil and application of the source of source doctrine to treat such receipts as not satisfactorily explained.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comprehensive Review of the Tonnage Tax Scheme : Clause 226(7) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115VF of the Income-tax Act, 1961

      10 May, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Clause 226 Tonnage tax scheme.

      Income Tax Bill, 2025

      1. Introduction

      Clause 226(7) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and Section 115VF of the Income-tax Act, 1961 both address the computation and taxation of income for shipping companies under the specialized "tonnage tax scheme." The tonnage tax regime represents a significant policy choice, designed to encourage the growth and competitiveness of the Indian shipping industry by providing a simplified and predictable method of income computation, distinct from the traditional net profit-based taxation.

      This commentary provides a comprehensive analysis of Clause 226(7), including its context, objectives, detailed provisions, practical implications, and a comparative evaluation with the existing Section 115VF. The analysis draws attention to the legislative intent, interpretive nuances, and possible areas of convergence and divergence between the two regimes.

      2. Objective and Purpose

      2.1 Legislative Intent

      The core objective of both Clause 226(7) and Section 115VF is to provide a favorable and simplified tax regime for shipping companies, recognizing the unique nature of their business operations. The tonnage tax scheme (TTS) enables qualifying shipping companies to compute their taxable income based on the net tonnage of ships operated, rather than on actual profits, thereby offering certainty, reducing compliance burden, and enhancing international competitiveness.

      This approach aligns with international best practices, especially in jurisdictions with significant maritime interests, and is a response to the global mobility of shipping operations. The legislative intent is to make India an attractive base for shipping companies, reduce the risk of profit shifting, and ensure a stable revenue stream for the exchequer.

      2.2 Policy Considerations and Historical Background

      The tonnage tax regime was first introduced in India through Chapter XII-G (Sections 115V to 115VZC) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, effective from assessment year 2005-06. The regime was modeled after similar schemes in Europe and Asia, aiming to arrest the declining trend of Indian ships in global trade and to counter the flight of shipping companies to more tax-friendly jurisdictions.

      The Income Tax Bill, 2025 seeks to modernize and consolidate tax provisions, including those relating to tonnage tax, and Clause 226(7) is part of this effort to provide clarity and continuity to the shipping sector.

      3. Detailed Analysis of Clause 226(7) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

      3.1 Structure and Key Provisions

      Clause 226(7) reads as follows:

      Subject to the other provisions of this Part,-
      1. the tonnage income, shall be-
        1. computed as per section 227; and
        2. deemed to be the profits chargeable under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession"; and
      2. the relevant shipping income referred to in section 228(1) shall not be chargeable to tax.

      This provision is embedded within a comprehensive framework (Clause 226(1)-(6)), which sets out the scope, eligibility, and procedural requirements of the tonnage tax scheme. Sub-clause (7) specifically addresses the computation and taxability of "tonnage income" and the exemption of "relevant shipping income."

      3.2 Breakdown and Interpretation

      • Computation as per Section 227:

        Clause 226(7)(a)(i) mandates that the "tonnage income" must be computed in accordance with Section 227. Although Section 227 is not reproduced here, it is expected to lay down the methodology for calculating notional income based on net tonnage, similar to the detailed computation mechanism u/s 115VG of the 1961 Act. This ensures that the tonnage tax scheme remains formulaic and not profit-based.

      • Deemed Profits:

        Clause 226(7)(a)(ii) provides that the tonnage income so computed shall be deemed to be the profits chargeable under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession." This legal fiction is critical, as it allows the tonnage income to be taxed under the regular business income head, while separating it from actual accounting profits. This approach simplifies tax administration and provides certainty to taxpayers.

      • Exclusion of Relevant Shipping Income:

        Clause 226(7)(b) stipulates that "the relevant shipping income referred to in section 228(1) shall not be chargeable to tax." This means that once a shipping company opts for the tonnage tax scheme, and its income is computed on a notional basis, the actual income derived from shipping operations (as defined in Section 228(1)) is excluded from the tax base, preventing double taxation and ensuring the integrity of the tonnage tax regime.

      3.3 Legislative Safeguards

      Clause 226(7) is "subject to the other provisions of this Part," indicating that the computation and exemption are not absolute but are contingent on compliance with the broader eligibility, option, and procedural requirements set out in the preceding and succeeding clauses. This includes the need for a valid option (as per Section 231), qualifying ship criteria, and the separation of tonnage tax business from other activities.

      3.4 Ambiguities and Interpretive Issues

      While the language of Clause 226(7) is largely clear, potential ambiguities may arise concerning:

      • The precise scope of "relevant shipping income" u/s 228(1), especially if the definition is expanded or altered from the 1961 Act.
      • Interaction with other tax provisions, such as Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) or provisions relating to international shipping income.
      • Procedural safeguards to prevent abuse or misclassification of income.

      4. Practical Implications

      4.1 Impact on Stakeholders

      • Shipping Companies:

        The tonnage tax scheme continues to offer shipping companies a predictable, low-compliance, and competitive tax regime. By taxing notional income based on net tonnage, companies are insulated from volatile profits and complex accounting adjustments. The exclusion of actual relevant shipping income from tax further incentivizes participation in the scheme.

      • Tax Authorities:

        The regime simplifies tax administration, reduces litigation over allowable expenses and depreciation, and provides a stable revenue stream. However, tax authorities must remain vigilant against attempts to misclassify income or artificially inflate qualifying tonnage.

      • Regulators and Policy Makers:

        The continuity of the tonnage tax regime signals policy stability, which is critical for long-term investment decisions in shipping. However, there remains a need for periodic review to ensure that the scheme remains aligned with international developments and does not become a vehicle for tax avoidance.

      4.2 Compliance and Procedural Aspects

      Companies must ensure strict compliance with the eligibility conditions, option procedures, and record-keeping requirements. The separation of tonnage tax business from other activities requires robust internal controls and accounting segregation. Any deviation may result in loss of scheme benefits and reversion to standard profit-based taxation.

      5. Comparative Analysis with Section 115VF of the Income-tax Act, 1961

      5.1 Textual Comparison

      Section 115VF of the Income-tax Act, 1961 states:

      Subject to the other provisions of this Chapter, the tonnage income shall be computed in accordance with section 115VG and the income so computed shall be deemed to be the profits chargeable under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession" and the relevant shipping income referred to in sub-section (1) of section 115V-I shall not be chargeable to tax.

      A side-by-side comparison reveals that Clause 226(7) essentially mirrors the substance of Section 115VF, with only minor differences in cross-references (i.e., Section 227 vs. Section 115VG; Section 228(1) vs. Section 115V-I(1)), which are a result of the restructuring and renumbering in the new Bill.

      5.2 Substantive Parity

      • Computation Mechanism:

        Both provisions anchor the computation of tonnage income to a separate section (Section 227/115VG), which prescribes the detailed methodology. The legal fiction of "deemed profits" is maintained in both, ensuring continuity in the tax treatment.

      • Exclusion of Actual Shipping Income:

        Both provisions categorically exclude the actual "relevant shipping income" from tax once the tonnage tax scheme is opted for, thereby avoiding double taxation and maintaining the integrity of the notional income approach.

      • Conditional Applicability:

        The phrase "subject to the other provisions of this Part/Chapter" is present in both, underscoring that the benefit is not unconditional but subject to compliance with eligibility, option, and procedural requirements.

      5.3 Differences and Evolution

      • Reorganization and Modernization:

        The Income Tax Bill, 2025 reorganizes and modernizes tax provisions, including tonnage tax, for clarity and accessibility. While the substantive content is unchanged, the new structure may facilitate easier reference and compliance.

      • Potential for Expanded Definitions:

        The Bill provides an opportunity to update definitions and computation methods to reflect changes in shipping practices (e.g., inclusion of inland vessels, slot/space charters). Any such changes would be reflected in the cross-referenced sections (Section 227, 228), and not in Clause 226(7) directly.

      5.4 International Context and Comparison

      The Indian tonnage tax regime, as reflected in both the 1961 Act and the 2025 Bill, is consistent with international models prevalent in the UK, EU, Singapore, and other maritime jurisdictions. The legal fiction of "deemed profits" and the exclusion of actual income are standard features globally, designed to provide certainty and prevent disputes over expense allocation and transfer pricing.

      5.5 Potential Issues and Conflicts

      • Interaction with Other Tax Provisions:

        Issues may arise regarding the interaction of tonnage tax provisions with MAT, transfer pricing, or anti-avoidance rules. The legislative framework must ensure that the notional nature of tonnage income is respected across other tax computations.

      • Ambiguity in Definitions:

        Any change in the definition of "qualifying ship," "relevant shipping income," or "operating a ship" could have significant implications. The Bill's approach to these definitions must be carefully harmonized with the intent and structure of the tonnage tax regime.

      6. Conclusion

      Clause 226(7) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 represents a continuation and reaffirmation of the tonnage tax regime for shipping companies, as established under Section 115VF of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The provision maintains the core features of notional income computation, legal fiction of deemed profits, and exclusion of actual shipping income, thereby ensuring policy continuity and stability for the shipping sector. The restructuring in the Bill does not alter the substantive rights or obligations of taxpayers but may enhance clarity and compliance.

      For stakeholders, the regime remains attractive and internationally competitive, but careful attention must be paid to compliance, evolving definitions, and the interaction with other tax provisions. Periodic review and judicial clarification may be warranted to address emerging issues and to ensure that the regime continues to serve its intended purpose without being susceptible to abuse.


      Full Text:

      Clause 226 Tonnage tax scheme.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax