Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Rate of income-tax in case of companies - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment Yea...
    Rate of income-tax in case of every local authority - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the As...
    Rate of income-tax in the case of ever firm (partnership firm) - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates -...
    Rate of Tax in case of co-operative society - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment...
    Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment Year 2018-19 and Rates for deduction of tax at source from "Sa...
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    Classification of goods - Impact of use of punctuation mark
    Case LawsCustoms
    Withdrawal of Anti-Dumping Duty - Designated Authority has no power to give retrospective relief
    Meaning and scope of supply under GST (Part 2) - Import of services will be treated as supply and wi...
    Meaning and scope of supply under GST (Part 1) - Since CGST, SGST or IGST will be levied on supply o...
    Case LawsService Tax
    Whether the vessels or ships that are afloat are not goods and immovable property? - CESTAT says Yes...
    Case LawsService Tax
    Adjustment of excess paid service tax – rule 6(3) of STR, 1994
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Currency conversion using telegraphic transfer buying rate (‘TTBR...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Documents to be furnished for availing FTC
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) in case of MAT/ AMT
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Lower of the tax payable under the Act and DTAA
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Cases in which no FTC benefit would be available
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) shall be allowed if evidence & undertaking furnished within 6 months ...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Meaning of foreign tax
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Benefit on proportionate basis
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - FTC benefit in the year in which income offered to tax
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Corporate tax rate differential for domestic companies introduced, with tiered surcharge rules and specified cess treatment applied.
    The Finance Bill revises company tax by setting a lower rate for domestic companies meeting a specified turnover threshold and a higher standard rate otherwise, while maintaining the existing rate for non-domestic companies. Tiered surcharge rates apply differently to domestic companies and to companies other than domestic companies, with marginal relief available. Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess remain generally applicable, but are not levied on tax deducted or collected at source for domestic companies and other residents under specified entries; both cesses still apply to salary TDS and to non-residents and non-domestic companies.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Rate of income-tax for local authorities remains unchanged; surcharge applies and marginal relief available for high-income local authorities.
    Rate of income-tax for every local authority is preserved at the level specified for the prior assessment year. Surcharge is imposed on local authorities whose income exceeds the high-income threshold, levied at a specified percentage, and marginal relief is provided to mitigate abrupt liability increases near that threshold.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Firm income-tax rate continues unchanged, with surcharge for higher-income firms and marginal relief available.
    The rate of income-tax applicable to every firm continues at the same level as for the preceding assessment year for assessment year 2018-19. For firms with total income exceeding one crore rupees, a surcharge is levied at twelve per cent, and marginal relief is available where applicable.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Co-operative society tax rates remain unchanged for the assessment year; surcharge applies to higher incomes and marginal relief provided.
    Rates of income-tax for co-operative society taxpayers remain the same as in the prior assessment year under the First Schedule of the Finance Bill, 2017. A surcharge applies to societies with higher income and marginal relief is provided to mitigate surcharge impact at threshold points.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Income-tax rate structure revised for salaries, advance tax and special cases with senior citizen slabs and surcharge.
    Part III of the First Schedule to the Finance Bill, 2017 prescribes the income-tax rates for deduction at source from salaries, advance tax computation and charging of income-tax in special cases for financial year 2017-2018. Tiered progressive rates apply to individuals, HUFs, AOPs, BOIs and specified artificial juridical persons. Distinct nil-tax thresholds and slab treatment are provided for resident individuals aged sixty to less than eighty and for those aged eighty or more. A surcharge of ten per cent applies within a defined high-income range and fifteen per cent above the higher threshold, with marginal relief available.
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Punctuation in statutory entries limits tax conditions, so excise levy applies only to specifically linked goods.
    Punctuation in statutory entries must be given effect; a colon and conjunctions in the schedule create a break separating "leather cloth and inferior or imitation leather cloth ordinarily used in book binding" from other goods, so the condition imposing additional excise duty in lieu of sales tax applies only to the latter group. Historical layout of the entry corroborates this limited reading, and absence of argument before the Tribunal does not estop application of the statutory construction.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Withdrawal of anti dumping duty: Designated Authority lacks power to grant retrospective relief; rescission is prospective.
    Designated Authority lacks power to recommend retrospective withdrawal of an anti dumping duty following a mid term review; where domestic producers ceased production and the authority recommended rescission, the government's rescission preserved prior acts, and the tribunal held no rule permits retrospective relief in review proceedings, so withdrawal operates prospectively.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Importation of services: subject to GST under reverse charge; potential double levy with customs needs exemption.
    Importation of services falls within the definition of Supply and is subject to GST under the reverse charge mechanism, creating potential overlap with Customs duty where transactions importing goods are contractually treated as services. Administrative or legislative clarification is needed to prevent concurrent levies, either by Customs exemptions for imports characterised as services or reciprocal GST relief where Customs duties apply. The draft also raises uncertainty about personal use exemptions limited to taxable persons and suggests extension or harmonisation of exemptions for non taxable persons.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Scope of supply under GST includes consideration-based transactions, importation of services, and specified free supplies.
    The statutory definition of supply under the Model GST Law comprises three categories: supplies for consideration in the course or furtherance of business (sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal); importation of services regardless of consideration or business purpose; and specified supplies made without consideration as listed in Schedule I. Clause (a) targets domestic, consideration-based transactions; clause (b) treats importation of services as separately taxable; and clause (c) assimilates certain gratuitous transactions into the tax net via Schedule I.
    Case LawsService Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Classification of floating vessels as immovable property may exclude their sale from GST law taxation.
    The tribunal held that ships and vessels afloat are not 'goods' but are akin to immovable property because they cannot be severed from the waters; ships are goods only before launch, during breaking up, or when specifically the subject of a sale. As immovable property lies outside the GST domain under the constitutional allocation, this classification raises the question whether GST would apply to sale or supply of floating vessels-a point pending higher judicial scrutiny.
    Case LawsService Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Adjustment of excess service tax permitted as alternative to refund under liberal interpretation of procedural rules.
    A liberal reading of Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 permits adjustment of excess service tax paid against future liabilities when facts show an excess payment, rather than restricting the assessee solely to a refund claim, consistent with constitutional limits on taxation and the Revenue's concession of excess payment.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign tax credit conversion uses telegraphic transfer buying rate on the last day of preceding month.
    Foreign tax credit is determined by converting the currency of the foreign-tax payment at the telegraphic transfer buying rate applicable on the last day of the month immediately preceding the month in which that tax is paid or deducted.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign Tax Credit documentation: verified income statement plus certificate and payment or deduction proof to claim credit.
    Foreign Tax Credit eligibility requires a verified statement of foreign income and foreign tax paid in the prescribed form, plus a certificate or statement specifying the nature of the income and tax deducted or paid issued by the foreign tax authority, the person who deducted the tax, or signed by the taxpayer, accompanied by a tax challan or online payment acknowledgement for payments and proof of deduction where tax was withheld.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign tax credit allowed against MAT/AMT like normal tax, but any excess over normal provisions is ignored.
    Foreign tax credit under Rule 128 of the Income tax Rules, 1962, is allowable against tax payable under MAT or AMT in the same manner as under the normal provisions; any foreign tax credit available against MAT/AMT that exceeds the credit allowable under normal provisions is ignored when computing MAT/AMT credit.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign tax credit: credit limited to lower of domestic tax and foreign tax; treaty excess is disregarded.
    Rule 128 of the Income tax Rules, 1962 limits Foreign Tax Credit to the lesser of domestic tax chargeable on the doubly taxed income and the foreign tax actually paid, and directs that any foreign tax paid in excess of the tax payable under the applicable DTAA be ignored for credit computation.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign Tax Credit denial: no credit for domestic interest, fees or penalties and for disputed foreign taxes.
    Rule 128 restricts Foreign Tax Credit by disallowing FTC against interest, fees or penalties payable under the Income-tax Act, and by excluding any foreign tax (or part thereof) that is disputed by the assessee.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign Tax Credit requires evidence of settlement, proof of payment and an undertaking within six months of dispute resolution.
    Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is allowed for disputed foreign tax only if, within six months from the end of the month in which the dispute is finally settled, the assessee furnishes evidence of settlement, evidence that the tax liability has been discharged by the assessee, and an undertaking that no refund in respect of that amount has been or will be claimed.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign tax definition determines FTC scope: DTAA-covered taxes apply, otherwise income-tax-type foreign levies qualify for credit.
    Definition of foreign tax for Foreign Tax Credit under Rule 128: where a DTAA exists, foreign tax is the tax covered by that DTAA; where no DTAA exists, foreign tax is the tax payable under the foreign country's law in the nature of income-tax as defined in the statutory explanation, including excess profits tax or business profits tax charged on profits by central or local authorities.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign tax credit proportionate allocation ensures foreign tax relief is apportioned when income is taxed across multiple years.
    Foreign tax credit under the Income tax Rules operates on a proportionate allocation principle when the same income is taxable in more than one year; the credit entitlement must be apportioned across the years in which the income is offered to tax so that relief for foreign taxes corresponds to the portion of income taxed in each year.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign tax credit allowed when foreign tax corresponds to income offered or assessed to tax in India in the same year.
    Foreign tax credit is available to Indian residents for tax paid in a foreign country or specified territory, and is allowed only in the year when the corresponding income is offered to tax or assessed to tax in India, creating a temporal link between domestic taxation of the income and recognition of the foreign tax credit.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Reducing tax avoidance by curbing the excessive use of deductions and exemptions by corporate and select non-corporate entities : Clause 206(18) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115JEE of the Income-tax Act, 1961

      7 May, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Clause 206 Special provision for minimum alternate tax and alternate minimum tax.

      Income Tax Bill, 2025

      Introduction

      Clause 206 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, represents a comprehensive attempt to consolidate, modernize, and rationalize the regime of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) and Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) in India. These mechanisms were introduced to ensure that taxpayers, especially corporates and certain non-corporate entities, who avail themselves of various deductions and incentives, contribute a minimum amount of tax to the exchequer, thus curbing tax avoidance through excessive claims of deductions and exemptions. Within Clause 206, sub-clause (18) carves out specific exemptions from the applicability of the MAT/AMT provisions. This commentary will undertake a detailed analysis of Clause 206(18), its objectives, practical implications, and a clause-by-clause comparison with Section 115JEE of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which governs the application of AMT to non-corporate entities.

      Objective and Purpose

      The legislative intent behind MAT and AMT is to ensure a fair and equitable tax regime, preventing entities from escaping tax liability through aggressive tax planning. Clause 206(18) serves as a critical filter, delineating the classes of taxpayers and circumstances under which the MAT/AMT regime would not apply. The rationale is to avoid imposing minimum tax liability in situations where either policy reasons or practical considerations warrant exclusion, such as for certain life insurance companies, entities opting for alternative tax regimes, or those with low adjusted total income.

      Detailed Analysis of Clause 206(18) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

      (a) Exclusion for Life Insurance Companies

      This sub-clause exempts companies whose income arises from life insurance business as referred to in section 194(1)(Table: Sl. No. 6). The rationale is rooted in the unique nature of life insurance business, where accounting for policyholder liabilities, actuarial valuations, and regulatory frameworks under the Insurance Act complicate the application of MAT. Historically, such companies have been subject to special tax provisions, recognizing the mismatch between book profits and taxable profits due to the peculiarities of insurance accounting. The exclusion ensures that the MAT regime does not override the specialized tax treatment accorded to life insurance companies.

      (b) Exclusion for Persons Opting for Alternative Tax Regimes

      Sub-clause (b) excludes persons who have exercised options u/ss 200(5), 201(2), 203(5), or 204(2). These sections, as per the structure of the new Bill, are likely to correspond to alternative tax regimes akin to the concessional tax rates introduced for corporates and individuals in recent years (for instance, the regimes u/ss 115BAA, 115BAB, 115BAC, and 115BAD of the Income-tax Act, 1961). The legislative intent is to encourage taxpayers to opt for simplified tax regimes with lower rates and fewer deductions, without the burden of MAT/AMT, thereby promoting ease of compliance and reducing litigation.

      (c) Exclusion for Persons Taxed u/s 202(1)

      This sub-clause excludes taxpayers whose total income is computed u/s 202(1). While the precise content of section 202(1) in the new Bill requires cross-reference, it is probable that it relates to certain special regimes or presumptive tax schemes (such as those for shipping, exploration, etc.), where the computation of income is on a presumptive basis. The exclusion avoids the incongruity of applying MAT/AMT when the regular tax itself is determined under a presumptive framework.

      (d) Exclusion for Individuals, HUFs, AOPs, BOIs, and Artificial Juridical Persons with Low Adjusted Total Income

      This is a significant carve-out, exempting individuals, Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs), associations of persons (AOPs), bodies of individuals (BOIs), and artificial juridical persons (AJPs) if their adjusted total income does not exceed twenty lakh rupees. The threshold-based exemption is designed to ensure that small taxpayers are not burdened with the complexities and compliance costs of MAT/AMT. It reflects a policy of progressive taxation, reserving the minimum tax regime for higher-income earners and sophisticated entities.

      (e) Exclusion for Specified Funds

      The final limb exempts specified funds referred to in Schedule VI (Note 1). These are likely to include certain categories of investment funds, such as those operating in International Financial Services Centres (IFSCs), alternative investment funds (AIFs), or other notified entities. The policy consideration is to maintain the competitiveness of India's financial sector, particularly IFSCs, by exempting such funds from MAT/AMT, which could otherwise erode returns and deter international capital.

      Practical Implications

      The exclusions under Clause 206(18) have wide-ranging practical implications:

      • Life Insurance Companies: The exclusion removes the compliance burden and potential distortions in tax liability for life insurers, aligning with global best practices.
      • Alternative Regime Opters: Taxpayers who choose the concessional rate regimes are incentivized, as they are not subject to MAT/AMT, making the new regimes more attractive and administratively simpler.
      • Presumptive Regime Taxpayers: The exclusion avoids the double imposition of minimum tax on entities already taxed on a presumptive basis, ensuring fairness.
      • Small Non-Corporate Taxpayers: Individuals, HUFs, AOPs, BOIs, and AJPs with modest income are spared from MAT/AMT, reducing compliance costs for small taxpayers and focusing enforcement on larger entities.
      • Specified Funds: Exempting specified funds, especially those in IFSCs, supports the government's policy to develop India as a global financial hub.

      From a compliance perspective, these carve-outs simplify tax administration and reduce the risk of litigation on MAT/AMT applicability. However, they also require careful monitoring to prevent abuse through artificial structuring to fall within the exclusions.

      Comparative Analysis with Section 115JEE of the Income-tax Act, 1961

      a. Structure and Scope

      Section 115JEE is the operative provision in the current Income-tax Act for the application of AMT to non-corporate taxpayers. It specifies:

      b. Points of Convergence

      • De Minimis Exemption: Both Clause 206(18)(d) and Section 115JEE(2) exempt individuals, HUFs, AOPs, BOIs, and certain artificial juridical persons if their adjusted total income does not exceed twenty lakh rupees. This reflects policy continuity and a shared recognition of the need to shield small taxpayers from AMT.
      • Specified Funds Exemption: Clause 206(18)(e) and Section 115JEE(2A) both exempt specified funds, though the cross-references differ due to changes in the legislative architecture. The underlying intent-to promote fund industry growth and align with international practice-remains the same.

      c. Points of Divergence and Expansion

      • Corporate Taxpayers and Life Insurance Companies: Section 115JEE is focused on non-corporate taxpayers, while Clause 206(18) applies to both corporate and non-corporate taxpayers, with explicit exemption for life insurance companies. This reflects a broader and more nuanced approach in the new Bill.
      • Special Regimes and Options: Clause 206(18)(b) and (c) introduce exemptions for persons opting for specific regimes (sections 200(5), 201(2), 203(5), 204(2), and 202(1)), which are not directly mirrored in Section 115JEE. This suggests a move towards greater flexibility and accommodation of new tax regimes in the 2025 Bill.
      • Comprehensive Structure: Clause 206(18) is part of a much more detailed and integrated MAT/AMT regime, covering both companies and non-corporate entities, and providing for a wider range of exclusions and computational refinements.

      Point-by-Point Comparison

      TopicClause 206(18) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025Section 115JEE of the Income-tax Act, 1961Analysis/Comments
      Exclusion for Life Insurance CompaniesExpressly excludes companies with income from life insurance business (s.194(1)(Table: Sl. No. 6))No specific exclusionMore explicit in new Bill; addresses a gap in the old regime, aligning with sector-specific tax treatment.
      Exclusion for Alternative Tax Regime OptersExcludes those who opt for alternative regimes (s.200(5), 201(2), etc.)No direct parallel; old Act only provides for AMT exclusion if deductions are not claimedNew Bill proactively excludes alternative regime opters, reflecting policy shift towards concessional, deduction-less regimes.
      Exclusion for Presumptive TaxationExcludes those whose tax is computed under s.202(1)No direct parallelAddresses practical issues in applying MAT/AMT to presumptive regimes, which was a source of ambiguity earlier.
      Threshold-based ExclusionExcludes individuals, HUFs, AOPs, BOIs, AJPs with adjusted total income <= Rs. 20 lakhsSame exclusion (sub-section (2))Threshold and classes of persons are consistent across both regimes. Ensures small taxpayers are not burdened.
      Exclusion for Specified FundsExcludes specified funds as per Schedule VI (Note 1)Excludes specified funds as per s.10(4D) (sub-section (2A))Both regimes exempt specified funds, though the referencing differs (Schedule vs. section). Reflects continuity in policy for funds, especially those in IFSCs.
      Scope/Classes of Excluded TaxpayersBroader, includes companies (life insurance), alternative regime opters, and othersFocused on non-corporate entities and specified fundsNew Bill expands the range of exclusions, reflecting changes in tax policy and the evolution of business structures.

      Interpretational and Policy Issues

      • Alignment with Policy Objectives: Both provisions seek to ensure MAT/AMT does not apply to small taxpayers or entities subject to special tax regimes. The new Bill's approach is more comprehensive and explicit, reducing scope for interpretational disputes.
      • Administrative Clarity: The new Bill's detailed exclusions provide greater certainty for taxpayers and administrators, especially in the context of new business models (e.g., IFSCs, specified funds).
      • Potential for Abuse: While broad exclusions are beneficial, they also necessitate robust anti-abuse rules to prevent taxpayers from artificially structuring affairs to fall within exemptions.
      • Continuity and Transition: The carry-forward and set-off mechanisms for MAT/AMT credit (addressed in other sub-clauses) are preserved, ensuring smooth transition for taxpayers moving from the old to the new regime.

      Practical Implications for Stakeholders

      • Businesses (Corporates and Non-corporates): The expanded exclusions, especially for companies engaged in life insurance, those opting for alternative regimes, and specified funds, simplify compliance and reduce effective tax rates for eligible entities.
      • Small Taxpayers: The Rs. 20 lakh adjusted total income threshold remains a critical relief, ensuring that individuals and small entities are not subject to MAT/AMT. This aligns with the government's stated policy of reducing compliance burden for small taxpayers.
      • Investment Funds and IFSC Entities: The explicit exemption for specified funds and IFSC units supports the development of India's financial sector and enhances international competitiveness.
      • Tax Administrators: Clearer exclusions reduce the administrative complexity and potential for disputes on MAT/AMT applicability, allowing focus on higher-value cases.

      Ambiguities and Issues in Interpretation

      • Definition of Specified Funds: The reference to "specified funds referred to in Schedule VI (Note 1)" in the new Bill must be read in conjunction with the relevant Schedule, which may be subject to future amendments or notifications. This introduces a dynamic element, requiring stakeholders to stay updated.
      • Interaction with Other Provisions: The cross-referencing to sections 200(5), 201(2), etc., presumes familiarity with the new Bill's structure. Taxpayers and professionals must exercise diligence to ensure correct interpretation and application.
      • Threshold Calculation: The computation of "adjusted total income" for threshold purposes must be strictly as per the formula and inclusions/exclusions specified, to avoid disputes.
      • Potential Overlap: In some cases, taxpayers may fall within more than one exclusion (e.g., a specified fund with income below Rs. 20 lakhs). The provision is drafted to ensure that any one ground is sufficient for exclusion.

      Comparative Analysis with Other Jurisdictions

      Globally, the concept of minimum taxation (including MAT/AMT) is not unique to India. The United States, for instance, has the Alternative Minimum Tax for individuals and corporations, though it has been substantially reformed in recent years. The trend internationally is towards simplification, with a focus on targeting only large-scale tax avoidance and ensuring that base erosion is checked without unduly burdening small or low-margin taxpayers. The Indian approach, as reflected in Clause 206(18), is largely in consonance with these trends, providing targeted carve-outs and aligning with sector-specific policy objectives.

      Conclusion

      Clause 206(18) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, represents a significant evolution in the MAT/AMT framework, providing clear, targeted exclusions that reflect both policy considerations and practical realities. Compared to Section 115JEE of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the new provision is more comprehensive, accommodating changes in business structures, tax regimes, and the government's policy priorities. By exempting life insurance companies, alternative regime opters, presumptive regime taxpayers, small non-corporate entities, and specified funds, the new law seeks to strike a balance between revenue protection and taxpayer facilitation. Going forward, the effectiveness of these exclusions will depend on robust anti-abuse measures, administrative clarity, and ongoing policy review to ensure alignment with the evolving economic landscape.

      Alternative Titles for the Commentary

      1. "Evolving the Minimum Tax Regime: A Critical Analysis of Clause 206(18) and Its Alignment with Section 115JEE"
      2. "Exclusions from Minimum Alternate Tax: Legislative Intent and Practical Impact under the Income Tax Bill, 2025"
      3. "From Section 115JEE to Clause 206(18): A Comparative Study of MAT/AMT Applicability and Exemptions"
      4. "Redefining the Scope of Minimum Tax: Detailed Commentary on Clause 206(18) and Its Predecessors"

       


      Full Text:

      Clause 206 Special provision for minimum alternate tax and alternate minimum tax.

       

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax