Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Judicial and Legislative Perspectives on Mens Rea in Income Tax Prosecutions :Clause 490 of the Inco...
    Presumptions in Tax Offence Prosecutions : Clause 489 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 278D ...
    Karta and Member Liability for Tax Offences : Clause 488 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 27...
    Directors' and Officers' Liability for Corporate Tax Offences : Clause 487 of the Income Tax Bill, 2...
    Balancing Deterrence and Fairness : Clause 486 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 278AA of Income-...
    Enhanced Penalties for Repeat Tax Offenders specified under Indian Tax Law: Clause 485 of the Income...
    Penal Provision for abetment in relation to the making and delivering of false returns - Clause 484 ...
    Penal Provision for Offences Relating to Falsification of Books in Indian Tax Law : Clause 483 of th...
    Prosecution for False Verification under Indian Tax Statutes : Clause 482 of the Income Tax Bill, 20...
    Penal Provisions for Failure to Produce Accounts and Documents : Clause 481 of the Income Tax Bill, ...
    Penal Provision for Failure to Furnish Return in Search Cases : Clause 480 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 ...
    Penal Provisions for Failure to File Income Tax Returns : Clause 479 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Se...
    Criminal Liability for Tax Evasion in India : Clause 478 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 27...
    Criminal Liability for TCS Defaults : Clause 477 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Section 276BB of Incom...
    Criminal Liability for TDS Defaults : Clause 476 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 276B of th...
    Evolution of Statutory Offences Against Tax Recovery in India : Clause 475 of the Income Tax Bill, 2...
    Penal Provisions for Non-Compliance during Tax Inspections : Clause 474 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025...
    Penal Consequences for Non-Compliance with Tax Authority Orders : Clause 473 of the Income Tax Bill,...
    Redefining the Bar of Limitation for Tax Penalties : Clause 472 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sec...
    Natural Justice and Administrative Oversight in Tax Penalties : Clause 471 of the Income Tax Bill, 2...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Presumption of culpable mental state shifts evidentiary burden to accused to disprove intent beyond reasonable doubt.
    Clause 490 mandates that once the prosecution establishes the actus reus, the court shall presume the existence of a culpable mental state-broadly defined to include intention, motive, knowledge, belief and reason to believe-and permits the accused to rebut that presumption only by proving absence of such mental state beyond reasonable doubt.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Presumption regarding assets and documents found in searches shifts evidentiary burden, now including virtual digital assets.
    Clause 489 creates a rebuttable presumption that assets (including virtual digital assets) and books or documents found in a person's possession during an authorised search, or received via requisition, are presumed to belong to that person and that documents' contents are true when tendered in prosecution, applied "so far as may be" by reference to the Bill's presumption provision and extending to other persons identified by the Bill's connected-person provision.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Presumption of karta guilt shifts evidential burden, requiring demonstration of due diligence to avoid prosecution.
    Clause 488 places primary criminal responsibility on the karta of a Hindu Undivided Family by deeming the karta guilty of an offence by the HUF, subject to statutory defences of lack of knowledge or proof of having exercised all due diligence. It further deems any member guilty where the offence is proved to have been committed with that member's consent or connivance or is attributable to their neglect, creating independent member liability while preserving the karta's available exculpatory defences.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Corporate officer liability: deeming provision shifts initial burden to accused, with due diligence defence for tax offences.
    Where a company commits an income-tax offence, the company and every person who was in charge of, and responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business at the time are statutorily deemed guilty and liable to prosecution, subject to a defence that the individual lacked knowledge or exercised all due diligence to prevent the offence; separate liability arises where the offence occurred with the consent, connivance, or neglect of officers, companies are punishable by fine while individuals may face full penal consequences, and definitions explicitly include firms and associations of persons.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Reasonable cause defence limits criminal liability for certain tax compliance failures, protecting bona fide taxpayers from prosecution.
    Clause 486 creates a non obstante statutory reasonable cause defence prohibiting punishment for failures under the specified sections of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 when the accused proves reasonable cause. The provision places the burden of proof on the accused, preserves judicial fact specific assessment of reasonable cause, and operates to limit prosecutions for bona fide or uncontrollable lapses while directing enforcement attention to willful or egregious defaults.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Enhanced penalties for repeat tax offences impose mandatory imprisonment and fine upon subsequent convictions under specified tax provisions.
    A prior judicial conviction under any specified income tax offence triggers enhanced punishment: a person again convicted under any of those listed offences is subject to mandatory rigorous imprisonment and a mandatory fine, regardless of whether the subsequent conviction is for the same or a different listed offence; judicial discretion governs the precise sentence within the prescribed range, and the provision applies only after a prior conviction, not mere charge or prosecution.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Abetment of false returns: broadened criminal exposure for facilitators with mandatory imprisonment and fines for culpable conduct.
    Clause 484 criminalises abetment or inducement in making or delivering false tax-related statements, requiring that the abettor know the falsity or not believe the statement to be true. Punishment is tiered by the quantum sought to be evaded, with mandatory minimum imprisonment terms and fines, while procedural details and definitions such as "induce" are not specified, raising interpretive and evidentiary challenges. The clause mirrors prior law's structure but broad wording could implicate advisors and intermediaries absent judicial or legislative clarification.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Falsification of accounting records: criminal liability for wilful false entries intended to enable another person to evade tax.
    Clause 483 makes it an offence to wilfully make or cause false entries in books of account or other documents with intent to enable another person to evade tax, interest, or penalty; it requires proof of wilful conduct and intent but not proof that the beneficiary actually evaded liability, covers physical and electronic records relevant to tax proceedings, and prescribes rigorous imprisonment and a fine.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    False verification offences: criminal liability requires proved knowledge or recklessness, with graded imprisonment and mandatory fines.
    The provision criminalises making false statements in any statutory verification or delivering false accounts where the person knows or believes the statement to be false or does not believe it to be true. Prosecution must prove this mental element beyond reasonable doubt. A graded penalty applies according to the financial impact of the falsity: substantial evasion attracts a higher term of rigorous imprisonment while other cases attract a lower term, and a fine is mandatorily imposed in addition to imprisonment.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Willful failure to produce accounts triggers criminal liability including imprisonment and mandatory fine under the new tax provision.
    Clause 481 establishes a penal offence for willful failure to produce accounts and documents called for by a notice under section 268(1), or willful non compliance with a direction under section 268(5), punishable by rigorous imprisonment for up to one year and liability to fine, with criminal prosecution requiring proof of willfulness beyond reasonable doubt and adherence to procedural safeguards; the clause mirrors prior law while leaving the fine quantum unspecified and raising interpretative issues regarding the threshold for willfulness and potential overlap with other provisions.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Wilful failure to furnish return in search cases creates criminal liability, exposing taxpayers to imprisonment and fines.
    Clause 480 penalises a person who, following a search and pursuant to a notice under section 294(1)(a), wilfully fails to furnish a return of income within the prescribed time. The provision requires proof of deliberate non compliance, treats the offence as criminal, and prescribes imprisonment along with a court levied fine, while prosecutions remain subject to ordinary criminal procedure and due process safeguards.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Willful failure to file returns attracts graded criminal penalties including imprisonment and fine; an extended cure period limits prosecutions.
    Clause 479 criminalizes the willful failure to furnish returns of income, applying to statutory filing obligations and notice-triggered duties, and establishes a graded criminal penalty regime tied to the tax that would have been evaded. It preserves a mens rea requirement, mandates imprisonment and fine across tiers, and provides exemptions including a one-year cure period to avoid prosecution and a de minimis exception for non-corporate taxpayers, while raising interpretative issues on the definition of wilfulness and calculation of evaded tax.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Wilful tax evasion criminalisation: updated offence framework tightens penalties and preserves additional monetary sanctions for deliberate under-reporting.
    Clause 478 establishes an offence of wilful attempt to evade tax, penalty, or interest, including under-reporting, distinguishing evasion of liability from evasion of payment. It prescribes graded sentences with discretionary fines and makes offenders liable to any other penalties under the Act. The provision's inclusive definition-false entries, false statements, wilful omissions, and other enabling circumstances-broadens prosecutorial scope while retaining the requirement to prove mens rea and preserving procedural safeguards for prosecution.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Failure to remit tax collected at source: criminal liability retained with a filing linked safe harbour to encourage timely compliance.
    Clause 477 criminalizes failure to remit tax collected at source, adopting a strict liability approach that imposes custodial sentence and fine while offering a statutory safe harbour where TCS is deposited on or before the time prescribed for filing the TCS statement, thereby aligning penal consequences and procedural exemption with the existing framework.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Criminal liability for failure to remit TDS expands enforcement and broadens managerial responsibility, with strict penalties.
    Clause 476 criminalizes failure to deposit taxes deducted or collected at source under Chapter XIX-B, extending liability to those who "pay or ensure payment" and prescribing rigorous imprisonment and fine. A proviso bars prosecution if the tax is credited to the Central Government on or before the time prescribed for filing the relevant TDS statement, while cross references to notes and tables expand the catalogue of covered transactions and may complicate interpretation.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Fraudulent asset dissipation criminalized: intent-based offence bars transfers aimed at defeating prescribed tax recovery proceedings.
    Clause 475 penalizes the fraudulent removal, concealment, transfer, or delivery of any property or interest with the intent to prevent it from being taken in execution of a prescribed recovery certificate, requiring proof of deceitful intent and applying to tangible and intangible interests; it retains the punitive framework of rigorous imprisonment and fine while replacing an explicit Second Schedule reference with a flexible "as prescribed" linkage to recovery procedures.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Failure to provide inspection facilities criminalises obstruction during tax inspections, attracting imprisonment and fine under the new bill.
    Clause 474 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, makes it an offence to fail to afford an authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect books of account or other documents under section 247(1)(b)(ii), punishable with rigorous imprisonment for up to two years and a fine. The clause largely mirrors Section 275B of the 1961 Act, raises interpretive issues about the definition of "necessary facility" and mens rea, and creates potential overlaps with other penal provisions, while preserving continuity in enforcement policy.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Contravention of tax authority orders may attract imprisonment and fine under the new income tax framework.
    Clause 473 establishes an offence for contravening orders under section 247(1)(viii) or (4), penalising such contraventions with rigorous imprisonment up to the statutory maximum and a fine. The clause focuses on breaches concerning custody, retention, or handling of assets or records during investigative processes. It does not specify mens rea or procedural attributes such as cognizability or bailability, so application and defences will be shaped by judicial interpretation and the Bill's broader procedural framework.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation period for tax penalties: quarter based uniform timeline aligns penalty orders with assessment and appellate outcomes.
    Clause 472 standardises the limitation for imposing tax penalties by prescribing a uniform six month period measured from the end of the quarter tied to the completion of proceedings, appellate or revisional orders, or issuance of a penalty notice; it permits revision of penalty orders to reflect subsequent assessment modifications, mandates a reasonable opportunity to be heard before adverse penalty action, and excludes rehearing and judicial stay periods from limitation computation.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Natural justice in tax penalties: hearing rights and hierarchical approval govern imposition and administrative oversight under new bill.
    Clause 471 requires that no penalty be imposed without the assessee being heard or given a reasonable opportunity, mandates prior Joint Commissioner approval for penalties exceeding specified officer thresholds, and requires that penalty orders passed by authorities other than the Assessing Officer be sent to the Assessing Officer. It mirrors core safeguards of the existing law but omits scheme enabling provisions for faceless, technology driven procedures and transitional rules, creating potential uncertainties over thresholds, definition of reasonable opportunity, procedural delays, and modernization.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      imposition of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) and Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) on various classes of taxpayers : Clause 206(1) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115JA of the Income-tax Act, 1961

      6 May, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Clause 206 Special provision for minimum alternate tax and alternate minimum tax.

      Income Tax Bill, 2025

      1. Introduction

      Clause 206(1) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (hereinafter "Clause 206(1)") introduces a comprehensive framework for the imposition of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) and Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) on various classes of taxpayers, including companies, co-operative societies, and other persons. This provision is a successor to and substantial evolution of the erstwhile Section 115JA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("Section 115JA"), which was the first statutory codification of the MAT regime in India, applicable to companies for a specified period (assessment years 1997-98 to 2000-01).

      The MAT regime was conceptualized to address the issue of "zero tax companies," i.e., companies that, despite having substantial book profits, paid little or no tax due to various deductions and exemptions available under the Act. Section 115JA sought to ensure that such companies contributed a minimum amount of tax based on their book profits. Over the years, with evolving business practices, accounting standards, and policy objectives, the MAT/AMT framework has undergone significant changes, culminating in the elaborate provisions proposed in Clause 206 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025.

      This commentary undertakes a detailed analysis of Clause 206(1), its objectives, mechanism, and practical implications, followed by a comparative evaluation with Section 115JA, highlighting key similarities, distinctions, and policy rationales.

      2. Objective and Purpose

      2.1 Legislative Intent behind Clause 206(1)

      The primary objective of Clause 206(1) is to ensure that all taxpayers, especially those availing of substantial deductions, exemptions, or incentives under the Income Tax Act, contribute a minimum quantum of tax based on their book profits (for companies) or adjusted total income (for other persons). The provision is designed to plug revenue leakages arising from aggressive tax planning and to promote horizontal equity in taxation.

      The inclusion of various classes of taxpayers (companies, co-operative societies, other persons) and the detailed mechanism for computation and adjustment reflects the legislature's intent to create a robust, anti-avoidance framework that is aligned with contemporary accounting standards and international best practices.

      2.2 Policy Considerations and Historical Background

      The policy rationale for MAT/AMT, as first enshrined in Section 115JA, was to counteract the proliferation of "zero tax companies" and ensure a minimum tax base. Over time, the regime has expanded to cover non-corporate taxpayers (through AMT), incorporated nuanced adjustments to reflect modern accounting standards (such as Ind AS), and provided targeted reliefs for specific sectors (e.g., International Financial Services Centres, IFSCs). Clause 206(1) embodies these policy developments, aiming for a balance between revenue protection and incentivization of priority sectors.

      3. Detailed Analysis of Clause 206(1) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

      3.1 Structure and Scope

      Clause 206(1) operates as a non-obstante provision, overriding all other provisions of the Act. It applies to all assessees listed in the prescribed Table, including companies (with special rates for IFSC units), co-operative societies, and other persons (excluding certain categories). The provision triggers when the tax payable on total income as computed under the Act is less than a specified percentage of book profit (for companies) or adjusted total income (for others).

      3.2 Mechanism of Operation

      • Deemed Total Income: Where the regular tax liability is less than the specified percentage of book profit/adjusted total income, the latter is deemed to be the total income for tax purposes.
      • Prescribed Rates: The Table specifies the applicable rates:
        • 15% of book profit for domestic companies (other than IFSC units).
        • 9% of book profit for IFSC units (companies earning solely in convertible foreign exchange).
        • 18.5% of adjusted total income for non-corporate assessees (excluding co-ops and IFSC units).
        • 9% for non-corporate IFSC units.
        • 15% for co-operative societies.
      • Computation of Book Profit and Adjusted Total Income:
        • Book Profit (for companies): Computed as per a specified formula (B = P + (I-R)), where P is profit per statement of profit and loss, I is the sum of items to be increased, and R is the sum of items to be reduced, as detailed in sub-section (2) of Clause 206.
        • Adjusted Total Income (for others): Total income before effect to this section, increased by specified deductions (e.g. under Chapter VIII-C, section 144, section 46, reduced by depreciation as per section 33).

      3.3 Key Provisions and Interpretative Issues

      3.3.1 Items to be Increased and Reduced (Book Profit Computation)

      The provision meticulously enumerates items to be added back to, or deducted from, the net profit as per the statement of profit and loss. These include income-tax provisions, reserves, provisions for unascertained liabilities, losses of subsidiaries, dividends, certain expenditures, depreciation, deferred tax, diminution in asset value, and specified adjustments for special categories (e.g., Ind AS companies, companies under insolvency, etc.).

      Similarly, reductions are provided for withdrawals from reserves (with anti-abuse conditions), income exempt under specified provisions, depreciation (excluding revaluation), certain losses, and other specified items.

      This detailed approach seeks to ensure that the book profit reflects the real economic profit of the company, minimizing the scope for manipulation through accounting entries.

      3.3.2 Special Provisions for Certain Assessees

      Clause 206(1) and its subsequent sub-sections provide tailored adjustments for various classes of taxpayers, including:

      • Members of associations of persons or bodies of individuals (AOP/BOI).
      • Foreign companies (with special rules for income taxed at concessional rates).
      • Companies involved in business trusts, demergers, or subject to insolvency proceedings.
      • Companies following Ind AS, with transition adjustments spread over five years.

      These provisions reflect an attempt to address the diverse tax positions and accounting practices of different taxpayers, thereby enhancing the equity and accuracy of the MAT/AMT regime.

      3.3.3 Exemptions and Non-Applicability

      Clause 206(6), (17), and (18) carve out significant exceptions. Notably, foreign companies without a permanent establishment, certain insurance companies, specified funds, and small taxpayers (with adjusted total income below INR 20 lakhs) are excluded. Further, the provision does not apply to successor LLPs in case of conversion, and to persons opting for certain alternative tax regimes.

      3.3.4 MAT Credit and Carry Forward

      A robust mechanism is provided for the grant, carry forward, and set-off of MAT/AMT credit, with a maximum carry-forward period of 15 years. No interest is payable on MAT credit, and adjustments are prescribed for foreign tax credits and subsequent changes in tax liability due to appellate orders.

      3.3.5 Procedural and Compliance Requirements

      Assessees subject to Clause 206 must obtain and furnish a report from an accountant certifying the computation of book profit or adjusted total income, thereby ensuring procedural rigor and minimizing disputes.

      3.4 Practical Implications

      • Wider Applicability: Unlike Section 115JA, which applied only to companies, Clause 206(1) extends MAT/AMT to co-operative societies and other non-corporate persons, subject to specified thresholds and exceptions.
      • Targeted Incentives: Lower MAT/AMT rates for IFSC units and certain non-corporate assessees encourage the development of international financial services and align with India's policy of promoting global competitiveness.
      • Alignment with Modern Accounting: The provision incorporates adjustments for Ind AS convergence, reflecting the transition to global accounting standards and reducing the scope for accounting arbitrage.
      • Enhanced Compliance Burden: The detailed adjustments, reporting requirements, and need for professional certification increase compliance costs but are justified by the need for accuracy and anti-abuse.
      • Relief for Distressed Entities: Special reliefs for companies under insolvency or sick industrial companies provide necessary breathing space to distressed businesses.

      4. Comparative Analysis: Clause 206(1) vs. Section 115JA

      4.1 Scope and Applicability

      • Section 115JA: Applied exclusively to companies for a limited period (AY 1997-98 to AY 2000-01), with a flat MAT rate of 30% of book profit.
      • Clause 206(1): Applies to a much wider spectrum of taxpayers (companies, co-ops, other persons), with differentiated rates and broader, more permanent application.

      4.2 Computation of Book Profit

      • Section 115JA: Book profit was defined as net profit per P&L account (as per Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956), increased by specified items (tax provisions, reserves, provisions for unascertained liabilities, etc.) and reduced by withdrawals from reserves, exempt income, certain losses, and profits from specified undertakings.
      • Clause 206(1): Retains the core structure but significantly expands the list of adjustments, incorporates Ind AS-related items, and provides detailed computational rules for special cases (e.g., business trusts, IFSC units, insolvency cases).

      4.3 Rates and Thresholds

      • Section 115JA: Flat 30% of book profit for all companies.
      • Clause 206(1): Graduated rates (15%, 9%, 18.5%) based on class of assessee and special status (e.g., IFSC), reflecting a more nuanced, incentive-driven approach.

      4.4 Adjustments for Losses and Depreciation

      • Section 115JA: Allowed reduction for loss brought forward or unabsorbed depreciation (whichever is less) as per books; certain exclusions applied.
      • Clause 206(1): Retains this principle but introduces further exceptions for companies under insolvency or specified circumstances, and provides for detailed tracking of such adjustments.

      4.5 Special Provisions and Carve-outs

      • Section 115JA: Excluded profits from power generation, infrastructure, industrially backward areas, and sick industrial companies for specified periods.
      • Clause 206(1): Expands carve-outs to include IFSC units, specified funds, certain foreign companies, insurance companies, small taxpayers, and those under alternative tax regimes.

      4.6 MAT Credit Mechanism

      • Section 115JA: Did not provide for MAT credit; this was introduced only with Section 115JAA (from AY 2001-02 onwards).
      • Clause 206(1): Contains a detailed MAT/AMT credit regime, including carry forward, set-off, and adjustment for foreign tax credits and appellate orders, with a 15-year carry forward period.

      4.7 Procedural Requirements

      • Section 115JA: Required preparation of P&L account as per Companies Act, 1956, and calculation of depreciation as per the same basis as for AGM presentation.
      • Clause 206(1): Requires professional certification of computation, and alignment with Companies Act, 2013 (or governing enactments for special companies), reflecting updated corporate law.

      4.8 Alignment with Modern Accounting Standards

      • Section 115JA: Based on Indian GAAP prevailing under Companies Act, 1956.
      • Clause 206(1): Incorporates adjustments for Ind AS convergence, transition amounts, and other comprehensive income, reflecting the evolution of Indian accounting standards.

      4.9 Anti-Avoidance and Anti-Abuse Measures

      • Section 115JA: Provided basic anti-abuse rules for withdrawal from reserves/provisions.
      • Clause 206(1): Incorporates more sophisticated anti-abuse measures, including detailed rules for reserves, provisions, transition adjustments, and special situations.

      4.10 Relief for Distressed Entities

      • Section 115JA: Provided relief for sick industrial companies for a limited period.
      • Clause 206(1): Expands relief to companies under insolvency proceedings, those with suspended boards, and provides for special treatment of profits/losses during the rehabilitation period.

      5. Practical Implications and Stakeholder Impact

      5.1 For Companies

      Clause 206(1) modernizes the MAT regime, aligning it with contemporary business realities and accounting standards. The provision ensures that companies, especially those availing of substantial deductions or operating in special economic zones, contribute a fair share of tax. The differentiated rates for IFSC units incentivize international financial activity, while the detailed computational rules reduce ambiguity and potential for disputes.

      5.2 For Non-Corporate Assessees

      The extension of AMT to non-corporate entities (co-operatives, others) brings parity and broadens the tax base, though small taxpayers are protected through income thresholds. Co-operative societies, which previously enjoyed more favorable tax treatment, are now subject to minimum tax, reflecting a shift towards a more uniform regime.

      5.3 For Foreign Companies and Multinationals

      The carve-outs for foreign companies without a PE, and for those earning only specified income taxed at concessional rates, provide clarity and avoid double taxation. The alignment with international tax treaties and the exclusion of certain IFSC activities enhance India's attractiveness as a global financial hub.

      5.4 For Distressed and Special Entities

      Companies under insolvency, sick industrial companies, and those undergoing restructuring are provided relief, reducing the tax burden during critical periods and facilitating business revival.

      5.5 Compliance and Administrative Burden

      While the provision enhances tax equity and revenue, it imposes significant compliance obligations, including detailed computations, professional certification, and ongoing tracking of MAT/AMT credit. However, these requirements are necessary to ensure the integrity of the regime and minimize litigation.

      6. Comparative Insights and Unique Features

      • Broader Applicability:Clause 206(1) applies to a wider range of taxpayers than Section 115JA, reflecting the evolution of the Indian tax base.
      • Modern Accounting Integration: Incorporation of Ind AS adjustments and transition amounts demonstrates a forward-looking approach, making the regime compatible with global standards.
      • Nuanced Incentivization: Special rates for IFSC units and carve-outs for specified funds reflect targeted policy interventions to promote priority sectors.
      • Comprehensive Credit Mechanism: The MAT/AMT credit regime is more robust and taxpayer-friendly, though subject to anti-abuse safeguards.
      • Enhanced Relief for Distressed Businesses: The inclusion of special rules for companies under insolvency or with suspended boards reflects a pragmatic approach to business cycles.

      7. Conclusion

      Clause 206(1) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 represents a significant evolution of the MAT/AMT regime originally introduced by Section 115JA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. While retaining the core principle of ensuring a minimum tax contribution based on book profits or adjusted total income, the new provision expands the ambit, introduces nuanced rates and adjustments, and aligns the regime with modern accounting standards and policy objectives. The comparative analysis reveals a shift from a simple, company-centric MAT to a comprehensive, multi-tiered framework

       


      Full Text:

      Clause 206 Special provision for minimum alternate tax and alternate minimum tax.

       

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax