Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Tax Credit Entitlement - Credit of TDS if deductor failed to deposit the TDS to the Government
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    A Landmark Judgment on Tax Credit Entitlement - Credit of TDS if deductor failed to deposit the TDS ...
    A Case of Coerced Input Tax Credit Reversal - GST recovery during search and seizure proceedings.
    Manner of compliance of conditions of pre-deposit - Debit of amount from electronic credit ledger (E...
    The need for clarity and concrete reasons in the cancellation of GST registrations.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Validity of reopening of assessment - need for a direct link between the portal's information and th...
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Application of provisions of section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 ...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Provisional release of imported goods (apples) - The dispute centers on the valuation of the import...
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Applicability of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance of expenses - need for tax authorities to have a practical understanding of the nature ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Disallowance of the assessee's business expenditure claims related to the purchase of sugarcane from...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Additions made u/s 69 and Section 56 in the absence of direct incriminating evidence linking the ass...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Whether penalty is to be imposed when the appellant has accepted the classification and paid the ent...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Liability for payment of customs duty on sale of excess liquor from the duty-free shop
    Case LawsCustoms
    Demand of customs duty beyond normal period of limitation on the ground of change in classification ...
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Stringent approach towards ensuring compliance with auditing standards - importance of auditors' res...
    Whether the appellant's claim can be classified as a Financial Debt or Operational Debt under the In...
    Scope of Approval of resolution plan - Allegations of undervaluation of the Corporate Debtor's asset...
    Denial of Input Tax Credit since the GST registration of the Supplier of Goods has been Cancelled wi...
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) is a vested right or concession - Can government impose conditions or restric...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    TDS credit entitlement affirmed: deductee entitled to credit despite deductor's non-deposit, preventing indirect recovery.
    Credit for tax deducted at source on interest payments is to be treated as tax paid on the deductee's behalf and does not depend on the deductor's remittance; statutory protections against indirect recovery prevent the revenue from seeking the same tax from the deductee when the deductor fails to deposit the deducted amount, and the deposit requirement in the applicable provisions does not negate the deductee's entitlement to such credit.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tax credit for TDS: deductee entitled to credit even if deductor failed to deposit the retained tax with government.
    The Court treats amounts retained by a deductor as remaining tax and concludes the statutory credit mechanism for tax deducted at source does not condition a deductee's entitlement on the deductor having deposited the retained amount with the government, thereby barring indirect recovery or adjustment against the deductee where tax has been deducted at source.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Coercive tax collection prohibited; forced reversal of input tax credit during search deemed impermissible, with investigatory remedies preserved.
    Dispute involved a search under Section 67 and an alleged coerced reversal of Input Tax Credit from the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger for supplies from a supplier with retrospectively cancelled registration; the court found such coercive recovery during search impermissible and directed restoration of the ITC while preserving the department's power to investigate and, if ineligible or fraudulent ITC is found, pass appropriate protective orders.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Pre-deposit payment method: Electronic credit ledger debit does not satisfy pre-deposit; cash ledger payment required for appeals.
    Pre-deposit for appeals under the CGST/BGST regime must be paid from the cash ledger; debit from the electronic credit ledger does not satisfy the statutory pre-deposit requirement. A revenue circular restricting ECRL use to certain output tax payments and excluding reverse charge, interest, penalties, fees, and similar amounts supports that ECRL cannot be used for pre-deposit. The court emphasized the statutory payment scheme and strict appeal filing timelines, rejecting arguments that ECRL debit could substitute for cash ledger payment.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Requirement of clear reasons in GST cancellation: retrospective deregistration must be reasoned and consider input tax credit effects.
    Cancellation of GST registration must be supported by clear reasons and concrete factual findings in show cause notices and cancellation orders; labels that a registration is "liable to be cancelled" without specifying dues or factual basis constitute mechanical action. Retrospective cancellation cannot be applied routinely; authorities must follow statutory procedure, assess causes for non-filing, consider exceptional disruptions to business operations, and account for the impact on input tax credit before fixing an effective date of cancellation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Use of portal data: digital information needs a direct evidential link before reopening income tax assessments.
    Reopening assessments requires a direct evidential link between portal-derived information and the income alleged to have escaped assessment; portal data alone is insufficient without documentary support for transactions or gifts, and a show cause notice must provide adequate particulars and reflect proper consideration of the taxpayer's response before reassessment proceeds.
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Show AI Summary
    Non retrospective application of punitive benami provisions affirmed, limiting enforcement to post amendment transactions.
    Application of Section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 concerns whether punitive provisions enacted in 2016 apply to transactions predating the amendment. The Appellate Tribunal relied on Supreme Court precedent that such punitive provisions must be applied prospectively, and the High Court emphasized adherence to that interpretation while allowing parties to pursue further remedies pending the Supreme Court review.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Provisional release of perishable imports allowed pending valuation, subject to provisional assessment and bond to protect revenue interests.
    The dispute concerns provisional release of perishable imported apples amid a valuation contest tied to a stayed minimum import price notification. The instrument requires provisional assessment of the Bill of Entry within a brief timeframe and permits conditional provisional release upon the importer furnishing a bond and meeting terms set by customs, thereby reconciling the protection of revenue interests with the practical need to avoid loss to perishable consignments pending final resolution of the notification's applicability.
    Case LawsBenami Property
    Show AI Summary
    Prospective application of punitive benami amendment upheld, limiting reach to post-enactment transactions and preserving pre-enactment protections.
    The Madras High Court affirmed that the enhanced punitive provision introduced by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 is substantive and applies prospectively; it endorsed the Tribunal's reliance on the Supreme Court's Ganapati Dealcom decision, treated a pending Supreme Court review petition as not displacing that precedent, and disposed of the appeals while allowing further proceedings consistent with prospectivity and prior constitutional findings.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Disallowance of expenses must rest on specific documentation defects, not on blanket percentage adjustments.
    Disallowance of business expenses on a summary or estimate basis requires specific, pointed deficiencies and cannot rest on generalized conclusions about excessiveness; in businesses with routine small transactions, tax authorities must examine the nature of operations and identify particular defects in documentation before applying blanket percentage disallowances.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Statutory Minimum Price interpretation: excess cane payments treated as appropriation of profits, not deductible business expense.
    The core issue is whether payments for sugarcane in excess of the Statutory Minimum Price (SMP) are deductible business expenditures or constitute an appropriation of profits. The Assessing Officer relied on standard accounting practice requiring provisions for liabilities at year end and treated post closing excess payments as distributions of operational surplus. The appellate view upheld that cooperative status does not alter the tax analysis and that payments beyond the SMP do not qualify as allowable business expenses absent proper provisioning within the accounting period.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Direct incriminating evidence requirement: third party search materials alone cannot sustain unexplained investment additions.
    Additions alleged as unexplained investments and undisclosed interest income based on third party search materials require a demonstrable direct nexus between those seized records and the assessee; absent such direct incriminating evidence, reliance on third party statements or documents is insufficient. Procedural safeguards and transactional indicia-such as cross examination opportunities, banking records, documentary support, and TDS-reduce the probative value of seized material when direct linkage is lacking.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty under Section 114A: no justification where importer accepted correct classification and paid differential duty before notice.
    Issue: imposition of a penalty for alleged suppression when the importer accepted correct tariff classification and paid the differential duty with interest before issuance of a show cause notice. The importer attributed the earlier misclassification to an agent error and denied intent to evade duty. The authority observed the accurate product description, admission of correct classification and prompt payment, concluded absence of suppression of facts and determined that the statutory penalty provision was not justified on these facts.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Liability under Section 72: duty rests with duty-free shop licence-holder when trade facility conditions are breached.
    Duty arises where a duty-free shop licence-holder breaches voucher and recordkeeping conditions under the trade facility; the licence-holder bears responsibility for payment of duty and interest when procedural requirements are violated, while penalty depends on culpability and may be disallowed where no intent to evade duty is established and customs were aware of the transactions.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Extended limitation in customs demands inapplicable where no suppression, limiting reassessment for CVD on undeclared MRP entries.
    Reassessment and CVD demand arose from a post-clearance change in classification and retrospective reliance on MRP for past entries; the tribunal held that items described were essential refrigeration parts rather than accessories, that MRP-based reassessment requires clear factual basis, and that the Extended Period of Limitation is inapplicable where no suppression is established, although penalty issues may still be considered where omissions occur.
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Auditor responsibility reinforced: regulatory findings against audit failures stress strict adherence to auditing standards and sanctions.
    NFRA found a statutory auditor guilty of professional misconduct for failures to comply with Standards on Auditing, including inadequate procedures to verify revenue, lack of physical inventory verification, insufficient going concern assessment, deficient materiality application, and inadequate communication with Those Charged with Governance, and applied regulatory sanctions to reinforce auditor responsibilities in preserving financial reporting integrity.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Operational debt classification confirmed for supplier's claim based on the transaction's nature under the insolvency framework.
    Whether a claim from a supply arrangement is a Financial Debt or an Operational Debt depends on the transaction's substantive character. The tribunal examined contractual terms-penalties for non-delivery, interest, and security cheques-and applied precedents on the financial-versus-operational distinction. It characterised the supplier's claim, filed under Section 9, as arising from the supply of goods and therefore as an operational debt, sustaining the Resolution Professional's and Adjudicating Authority's classification.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Commercial wisdom of committee of creditors governs resolution plan approval, limiting valuation and standing challenges by promoters.
    Exclusion of the creditor was non irregular as no claim was filed; undervaluation allegations were rejected since opportunities to raise them during the CIRP were not used; the resolution plan satisfied Committee approval requirements and reflected the Committee's commercial wisdom; and a suspended director/promoter lacked standing to challenge the approved plan, underscoring limited judicial interference post approval.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input tax credit denial over supplier deregistration; remanded for document verification and fresh adjudication to determine genuineness.
    Denial of Input Tax Credit was challenged where the supplier's registration was retrospectively cancelled; the petitioner paid through bank and the supplier appeared on records at the time. The High Court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the appellate authority to reconsider the petitioner's documentary evidence, hold a hearing, and pass a reasoned order verifying genuineness and timing of transactions; if purchases are genuine and occurred prior to cancellation, ITC is to be considered per precedent.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit as legislative concession: entitlement subject to statutory conditions, but retrospective deprivation of vested accruals is vulnerable.
    Input Tax Credit (ITC) is a legislative concession, not a vested right, so the legislature may lawfully prescribe eligibility conditions and procedural limits which taxpayers must strictly satisfy; however, retrospective amendments that destroy or diminish an already accrued entitlement are susceptible to challenge and have been treated as impermissible when they impair rights that vested before the amendment.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Incentivize and support authors by providing a tax deduction on royalty and copyright income : Clause 151 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 80QQA of the Income-tax Act, 1961

      19 April, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Clause 151 Deduction in respect of royalty income, etc., of authors of certain books other than text-books.

      Income Tax Bill, 2025

      Introduction

      Clause 151 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 introduces a new statutory provision regarding deductions in respect of royalty income and related receipts earned by authors of certain books, specifically excluding text-books. This provision is set against the backdrop of the existing Section 80QQA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which provides for a deduction in respect of professional income of authors, but with a focus on textbooks in Indian languages. The introduction of Clause 151 reflects a significant shift in legislative approach, both in terms of the scope of eligible works and the structure of the deduction. This commentary provides a comprehensive analysis of Clause 151, elucidates its objectives and implications, and undertakes a detailed comparative analysis with Section 80QQA, highlighting the evolution of legislative policy towards the taxation of authors' royalty income.

      Objective and Purpose

      The legislative intent behind Clause 151 is to incentivize and support authors engaged in the creation of literary, artistic, and scientific works, other than textbooks, by providing a tax deduction on royalty and copyright income. This marks a departure from the earlier approach u/s 80QQA, which was tailored towards the promotion of academic and educational works, particularly textbooks in Indian languages, as part of a broader policy to encourage vernacular education and academic publishing.

      Clause 151 seeks to broaden the categories of eligible works, presumably to foster creativity and innovation in the literary, artistic, and scientific domains beyond the confines of academia. The provision also aims to streamline compliance, set clear monetary limits, and address issues related to foreign income and double deduction, reflecting a modernization of the tax policy in line with contemporary publishing and copyright practices.

      Detailed Analysis of Clause 151 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

      1. Eligibility and Scope (Sub-section 1)

      This sub-section applies to individual residents in India who are authors and whose gross total income includes income derived in the exercise of their profession from:

      • (a) Lump sum consideration for assignment or grant of interests in the copyright of a book (literary, artistic, or scientific);
      • (b) Royalty or copyright fees (whether lump sum or otherwise) in respect of such books.

      The provision is explicit in its exclusion of textbooks (as clarified in the definitions), thereby targeting works intended for the general public or specialized audiences outside the formal education sector. The eligible income must arise from professional activity, ensuring that only genuine authorial income is covered.

      2. Quantum of Deduction (Sub-section 2)

      The deduction permitted is the lesser of:

      • (a) The whole amount of such income (i.e., 100% deduction);
      • (b) Three lakh rupees.

      This cap introduces a clear, fixed monetary limit, replacing the percentage-based approach of Section 80QQA. This change simplifies the calculation, provides certainty, and potentially broadens the benefit to mid-level authors, while limiting the benefit for high-earning authors.

      3. Limitation on Royalty-based Income (Sub-section 3)

      Where the income is not a lump sum for all rights, the provision restricts the deduction to royalty or copyright fee income not exceeding 15% of the value of books sold during the tax year. Any income exceeding this threshold is ignored for deduction purposes. This anti-abuse measure ensures that deductions are not claimed on disproportionately high royalty income, aligning the benefit with market realities and the value generated by actual sales.

      4. Foreign Income (Sub-sections 4 & 6)

      Income earned from foreign sources is only eligible for deduction to the extent that it is brought into India in convertible foreign exchange within six months (or such further period as allowed by the competent authority). Additionally, a certificate from the prescribed authority must be furnished for such income. These requirements ensure that the deduction is available only for income that contributes to the Indian economy and is subject to appropriate regulatory oversight, particularly in the context of foreign exchange laws.

      5. Procedural Compliance (Sub-section 5)

      No deduction is allowed unless the assessee furnishes a prescribed certificate, duly verified by the person responsible for making the payment (publisher or licensee), along with the return of income. This procedural safeguard aims to prevent fraudulent claims and ensures that the deduction is based on verified, bona fide transactions.

      6. Bar on Double Deduction (Sub-section 7)

      Once a deduction has been claimed and allowed under Clause 151 for any income, no deduction for the same income is permitted under any other provision of the Act. This anti-double-deduction provision prevents abuse and ensures the integrity of the tax base.

      7. Definitions (Sub-section 8)

      Key terms are defined as follows:

      • "Author" includes joint authors, expanding eligibility.
      • "Books" excludes brochures, commentaries, diaries, guides, journals, magazines, newspapers, pamphlets, textbooks for schools, tracts, and similar publications, by whatever name called. This exclusion is significant and narrows the scope to works intended as standalone literary, artistic, or scientific contributions.
      • "Competent authority" is the Reserve Bank of India or any other authority authorized to regulate foreign exchange.
      • "Lump sum" includes non-returnable advance payments.

      These definitions are crucial in demarcating the boundaries of the provision and preventing interpretational disputes.

      Practical Implications of Clause 151

      Impact on Authors

      Clause 151 provides a tangible tax benefit to authors of non-textbook works, potentially encouraging greater literary and scientific output. By excluding textbooks, the provision targets a different segment of the publishing industry, possibly reflecting an intent to support creative and scientific authorship outside the academic sphere.

      Impact on Publishers and Licensees

      Publishers and licensees are required to verify and certify payments, increasing their compliance responsibilities. This may necessitate additional documentation and procedural changes in royalty payment processes.

      Administrative and Compliance Aspects

      The requirement for certificates and adherence to foreign exchange norms introduces a compliance burden but also ensures that only genuine claims are allowed. The fixed cap on deduction simplifies assessment but may require periodic revision to keep pace with inflation and industry trends.

      Foreign Income and Exchange Control

      The provision's approach to foreign income ensures alignment with India's foreign exchange regulations and incentivizes repatriation of foreign earnings. This is consistent with broader economic policy objectives.

      Comparative Analysis: Clause 151 vs. Section 80QQA

      1. Scope of Eligible Works

      - Section 80QQA: Limited to text-books in Indian languages, dictionaries, thesauruses, encyclopaedias, or books prescribed/recommended by universities for degree/post-graduate courses.

      - Clause 151: Covers books of literary, artistic, or scientific nature, excluding text-books and certain other publications.

      Analysis: - Clause 151 is broader in terms of genre (literary, artistic, scientific) but narrower in that it excludes text-books, which were the primary focus of Section 80QQA. - The policy shift is from supporting educational/academic works to supporting general creative output.

      2. Language Requirements

      - Section 80QQA: Book must be in a language specified in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution or as notified by the Central Government.

      - Clause 151: No language restriction.

      Analysis: - Clause 151 is more inclusive, supporting works in any language, which reflects the multilingual and globalized nature of modern publishing.

      3. Quantum of Deduction

      - Section 80QQA: 25% of eligible income.

      - Clause 151: 100% of eligible income or Rs. 3 lakh, whichever is less.

      Analysis: - Clause 151 is more generous for authors earning up to Rs. 3 lakh in royalty/copyright income, but less so for high-earning authors, for whom the deduction is capped. - The simplicity and predictability of a fixed cap may be preferable from an administrative perspective.

      4. Duration and Applicability

      - Section 80QQA: Limited to specified assessment years (originally nine, later four years, as per amendments).

      - Clause 151: No such temporal limitation; applies as long as the conditions are met.

      Analysis: - Clause 151 offers a permanent incentive, while Section 80QQA was a time-bound promotional measure.

      5. Certification and Compliance

      - Section 80QQA: No explicit certification requirement, though standard proof would be required.

      - Clause 151: Explicit requirement for certificates from payers and prescribed authorities.

      Analysis: - Clause 151 introduces clearer compliance obligations, reducing the risk of spurious claims.

      6. Treatment of Foreign Income

      - Section 80QQA: No express provision for foreign income.

      - Clause 151: Explicitly allows deduction for foreign income, subject to repatriation and certification.

      Analysis: - Clause 151 is modernized to reflect the global nature of authorship and publishing.

      7. Definition of "Book"

      - Section 80QQA: Not explicitly defined, but contextually refers to text-books and certain academic works.

      - Clause 151: Explicitly excludes brochures, commentaries, diaries, guides, journals, magazines, newspapers, pamphlets, school text-books, and similar publications.

      Analysis: - Clause 151 provides clarity and mitigates interpretational disputes.

      8. Anti-duplication and Abuse Prevention

      - Section 80QQA: No explicit anti-duplication clause.

      - Clause 151: Explicitly bars double deduction and limits royalty income to 15% of sales for non-lump sum arrangements.

      Analysis: - Clause 151 is more robust in preventing tax avoidance.

      Comparative Table: Key Differences

      AspectClause 151 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025Section 80QQA of the Income-tax Act, 1961
      Eligible WorksLiterary, artistic, scientific books (excluding textbooks, periodicals, etc.)Textbooks, dictionaries, thesauri, encyclopedias in Indian languages
      Language RequirementNoneLanguages in Eighth Schedule or as notified
      Deduction QuantumLesser of 100% of income or Rs. 3 lakh25% of eligible income
      Procedural RequirementsCertificate from payer; certificate for foreign incomeNone specified
      Anti-abuse ProvisionDeduction restricted to 15% of value of books sold (for royalty income)Implicit, via scope and language restriction
      Foreign Income TreatmentDeduction only if income repatriated within 6 months and certifiedNot addressed
      Definition of "Author"Includes joint authorIncludes joint author
      Definition of "Lump sum"Includes non-returnable advanceIncludes non-returnable advance

      Conclusion

      Clause 151 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 represents a significant evolution in the tax treatment of authors' royalty income, shifting the focus from academic and vernacular publishing to a broader spectrum of literary, artistic, and scientific works. By introducing a fixed monetary cap, detailed compliance requirements, and specific exclusions, the provision seeks to balance the objectives of incentivizing authorship, preventing abuse, and ensuring administrative simplicity. The comparative analysis with Section 80QQA underscores the changing priorities of tax policy in response to developments in the publishing industry and the broader intellectual property landscape. Ongoing review and refinement of these provisions will be essential to ensure that they continue to serve their intended policy objectives in a rapidly changing creative economy.


      Full Text:

      Clause 151 Deduction in respect of royalty income, etc., of authors of certain books other than text-books.

       

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax