Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
    6. Text Search
  6. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  7. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
    8. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search ❯
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsGST
    Refund of IGST in SEZ Transactions: Legal Insights
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Unexplained Cash Deposits and Section 115BBE: Applicability of Higher Rate of Tax
    Case LawsCustoms
    Classification of goods and the reliance on technical reports for legal decision-making.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 127 of the Income Tax Act: A Case Study on Jurisdictional Transfer
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting Sections 22, 23, and 24: Taxation of Notional Rental Income from House Property and Vac...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 153A and Income Tax Assessments Post Search and Seizure Operations: Exploring the Role of In...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Analysis of Judicial Approach in Tax Evasion through Accommodation Entries: A Case Study
    Case LawsCustoms
    Adhering to Procedural Norms: The Importance of Timely Filing of Cross Objections
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    The Taxation of Cooperative Societies: A Legal Analysis of Deduction Eligibility U/s 80P
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Analyzing Section 43B's Application in Service Tax Liabilities: A Legal Perspective.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Assessing the Enforceability of Section 148 Notices Post-Assessee's Demise: Legal Heirs and Income T...
    Case LawsGST
    Balancing Tax Provisions and Circulars: Insights from a Refund of Unutilized ITC due to an Inverted ...
    Case LawsGST
    Typographical Error in E-way Bill and GST Penalty: A Legal Analysis
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Analyzing the Threshold for Criminal Prosecution in Cases of Non-Compliance with Income Tax Laws
    Case LawsIBC
    The Supreme Court's Interpretation of IBC: Balancing Stakeholder Rights and Procedural Efficiency
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Timeliness and Validity of Charitable Trust Registrations under Section 80G: A Legal Examination
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Nuances of Income Tax Reassessment Post-Finance Act 2021: Resetting the Clock in Tax ...
    Case LawsGST
    Interpretation of Reverse Charge Mechanism in Raw Cotton Purchases: The Role of Kacha Arhtia
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    The Source Rule in International Taxation: Tax Implications for Non-Resident Service Providers
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Taxation of 'Success Fees' in International Transactions: The Nexus Doctrine: Situs of residence and...
❮
❯
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Open Link
    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsGST
    Refund of IGST in SEZ Transactions: Legal Insights
    Show AI Summary
    Refund entitlement for SEZ supplies upheld despite endorsement delays and technical defects; limitation treated as directory.
    A refund claim for IGST on supplies to SEZ units should not be denied solely for delay or technical defects in export endorsements when delays arise from the authorized officer and the goods have reached the SEZ with tax remitted. The endorsement need not state authorized operations retrospectively. Procedural rules permit rectification and refiling of refund applications, limitation provisions are to be treated as directory in this context, and notifications excluding periods from limitation computation support allowance of genuine claims; minor documentary mismatches can be corrected by revised statements.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Unexplained Cash Deposits and Section 115BBE: Applicability of Higher Rate of Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Unexplained cash deposits: prospective application of higher tax rate under Section 115BBE clarified for post-amendment assessments.
    The assessing process treated certain cash receipts as unexplained under Section 69A read with the higher-rate taxation provision, but acceptance of an opening cash balance and maintenance of a cash book reduced the addition; contemporaneous records are decisive. The amendment imposing a special flat tax rate on unexplained income applies prospectively and does not operate retrospectively, so its applicability depends on the assessment year.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Classification of goods and the reliance on technical reports for legal decision-making.
    Show AI Summary
    Classification of goods: tribunal treated unauthorised laboratory testing as undermining test reports, affecting customs classification and valuation.
    Classification turned on whether imports were furnace oil or waste oil, with the tribunal emphasising the necessity that laboratory test reports originate from a laboratory authorised to analyse the substance; unauthorised testing undermined the reports' evidentiary weight and, accordingly, the tribunal accepted the appellant's declared classification and valuation while stressing reliance on duly authorised, competent laboratories for customs determinations.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 127 of the Income Tax Act: A Case Study on Jurisdictional Transfer
    Show AI Summary
    Jurisdictional transfer under Section 127 can reassign assessments within the same city without prior hearing, as an administrative measure.
    Jurisdictional transfer under Section 127 empowers senior tax officials to reassign cases for administrative convenience, generally requiring reasons and an opportunity to be heard; however, transfers within the same city do not require prior hearing. The tribunal found a valid transfer order centralising the matter within the same city, held the absence of prior hearing immaterial under the intra-city exception, and concluded the administrative transfer did not prejudice the assessee or invalidate the assessment.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting Sections 22, 23, and 24: Taxation of Notional Rental Income from House Property and Vac...
    Show AI Summary
    Notional rental income: ownership can trigger annual value assessment with standard deduction; vacancy allowance restricted when not let.
    Ownership alone can give rise to taxable annual value by way of notional rental income, with annual value for unlet properties determined by reference to expected rent and, where applicable, by a proportionate measure of property cost. From that annual value the statutory 30% standard deduction and interest on borrowed capital are deductible. Vacancy allowance is not treated as available where properties remain unlet for the entire year, and balance-sheet disclosure of property ownership can support assessment.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 153A and Income Tax Assessments Post Search and Seizure Operations: Exploring the Role of In...
    Show AI Summary
    Incriminating material discovered during search permits reassessment under Section 153A, validating additional income adjustments by tax authorities.
    The Tribunal applied the principle that discovery of previously undisclosed documents during a search can constitute incriminating material, thereby activating Section 153A jurisdiction to reassess income for multiple prior years. It found an undisclosed balance sheet showing ownership of properties as incriminating, and addressed related challenges - estimation of house property income, jurisdictional objections, notice deficiencies, interest levies, and natural justice claims - against the backdrop of valid reassessment under the search-linked provision.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Analysis of Judicial Approach in Tax Evasion through Accommodation Entries: A Case Study
    Show AI Summary
    Genuineness of transactions: accommodation entries and circumstantial evidence can defeat claimed tax exemptions without commercial substance.
    Denial of exemption under Section 10(38) is justified where claims rest on paper companies and accommodation entry providers; synchronized trading, SEBI identified price rigging, and weak connection between claimants and transactions diminish the probative value of demat statements and share certificates. The legal focus is on the onus of proof, application of the preponderance of probabilities and circumstantial inferences, requiring the assessee to establish commercial substance for unsecured loans and claimed trades rather than rely solely on documentation.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Adhering to Procedural Norms: The Importance of Timely Filing of Cross Objections
    Show AI Summary
    Timely filing of cross objections: strict procedural compliance required, limited scope for delay condonation without sufficient cause.
    The article focuses on the requirement to file cross objections within the prescribed period after service of an appeal notice, the department's failure to meet that timeline, and its subsequent delay condonation application citing unavailability of appeal copies and pandemic disruption. The tribunal closely examined these grounds, applied the sufficiency-of-cause standard and pandemic limitation guidance, and emphasized strict procedural compliance and departmental duty to ensure timely filings.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    The Taxation of Cooperative Societies: A Legal Analysis of Deduction Eligibility U/s 80P
    Show AI Summary
    Deduction under Section 80P for cooperative societies hinges on mutuality and classification as cooperative banks.
    Deduction eligibility under Section 80P depends on the principle of mutuality and on whether receipts involve entities that qualify as banking companies; interest income meeting mutuality criteria may be deductible for cooperative societies, whereas interest arising from dealings with entities classifiable as banks should be treated as income from other sources. The tribunal required verification of claims and reclassification of such interest where applicable.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Analyzing Section 43B's Application in Service Tax Liabilities: A Legal Perspective.
    Show AI Summary
    Section 43B payment rule prevents deduction for unpaid service tax, altering taxable income and accounting timing.
    Section 43B's payment-based rule makes deductions allowable only on actual payment; applied to service tax, unpaid service tax not remitted before the return filing due date is disallowable and may be treated as part of assessee's income, despite not being charged to profit and loss. Under mercantile accounting service tax received must be included in turnover, and legislative changes to payment schedules affect compliance timing; precedents reinforce that non-payment precludes deduction under the non-absentee payment requirement of Section 43B.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Assessing the Enforceability of Section 148 Notices Post-Assessee's Demise: Legal Heirs and Income T...
    Show AI Summary
    Validity of reassessment notices to deceased assessees hinges on proper service to legal heirs, else jurisdiction is lacking.
    The core legal rule is that reassessment notices must be served on a living person or the legal heir; issuance to a deceased individual vitiates jurisdiction. Service on the correct person is a condition precedent to reassessment, and legal heirs have no statutory duty to inform authorities of death. Legal representative liability arises only where proceedings began during the assessee's lifetime and may be continued against successors. Courts may restrain actions taken without jurisdiction while statutory remedies remain available.
    Case LawsGST
    Balancing Tax Provisions and Circulars: Insights from a Refund of Unutilized ITC due to an Inverted ...
    Show AI Summary
    Refund of unutilized ITC: circulars cannot override statutory entitlement where inverted duty structures cause credit accumulation.
    Interpretation of Clause (ii) of the proviso to Section 54(3) concerns eligibility for refund of unutilized ITC when inputs attract higher tax than outputs; administrative Circular No. 135/05/2020 was applied by revenue to deny refunds where principal input and output bore the same rate, but the circular cannot add to or curtail statutory entitlements and the legislative intent requires considering all inputs that cause ITC accumulation.
    Case LawsGST
    Typographical Error in E-way Bill and GST Penalty: A Legal Analysis
    Show AI Summary
    Typographical error in e-way bill should not attract GST penalty absent intent to evade tax.
    A typographical error in the e-way bill vehicle number resulted in seizure and a GST penalty; the court held that an isolated clerical mismatch, when other transport and tax documents correspond and no further evidence of evasion exists, does not demonstrate the requisite mens rea for penal action and quashed the penalty orders, stressing equitable application of detention and seizure provisions.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Analyzing the Threshold for Criminal Prosecution in Cases of Non-Compliance with Income Tax Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Failure to file tax returns within the prescribed time can sustain criminal prosecution despite later accepted belated returns.
    The dispute focuses on prosecution under Section 276CC for failure to file returns within the prescribed time, where acceptance of a belated return and dismissal of penalty proceedings do not necessarily negate the presumption of mens rea; the accused bears the burden to rebut intentional concealment, and evidential material from searches indicating undisclosed transactions can sustain criminal proceedings.
    Case LawsIBC
    The Supreme Court's Interpretation of IBC: Balancing Stakeholder Rights and Procedural Efficiency
    Show AI Summary
    Moratorium protection preserves debtor rights and enforces strict statutory timelines in insolvency proceedings while safeguarding participatory fairness.
    Stages under Sections 95-99 are non-judicial; the resolution professional facilitates fact-finding and gives a recommendatory report, while the adjudicating authority must independently assess materials and exercise jurisdiction. The moratorium functions as a protective statutory bar on creditor actions requiring strict adherence to timelines. Natural justice obligations persist: debtors retain participatory rights and an opportunity to be heard, and procedural fairness can be inferred from the legislative scheme even absent express hearing language.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Timeliness and Validity of Charitable Trust Registrations under Section 80G: A Legal Examination
    Show AI Summary
    Timeliness of Section 80G applications: application treated as timely and statutory reconsideration directed under purposive interpretation.
    Timeliness of registration under Section 80G was examined with focus on statutory deadlines, the effect of provisional approval under Section 80G(5), and amendments impacting trusts that commenced activities before formal registration; interpretation emphasised purposive and harmonious construction, legislative intent, natural justice in notice and hearing, and directed reconsideration of eligibility with opportunity to submit documents.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Nuances of Income Tax Reassessment Post-Finance Act 2021: Resetting the Clock in Tax ...
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation period in tax reassessment: amended time limits prevent retrospective validation of reassessment notices under the new regime.
    The document focuses on the amended reassessment regime introduced by the Finance Act 2021, highlighting the shortened limitation periods and the mandatory pre-notice procedure requiring inquiry and opportunity to be heard. It rejects administrative attempts to render earlier notices compliant with amended law via retrospective treatment, finds the 'travel back in time' theory legally impermissible, and stresses that limitation periods, pandemic-related extensions, and procedural safeguards determine the validity of reopening assessments.
    Case LawsGST
    Interpretation of Reverse Charge Mechanism in Raw Cotton Purchases: The Role of Kacha Arhtia
    Show AI Summary
    Reverse charge mechanism applies when buyer bears GST liability for raw cotton purchased through an intermediary Kacha Arhtia.
    The AAR concluded that a Kacha Arhtia acts as an intermediary who facilitates sale, executes Form I, deducts commission and remits proceeds to the seller, and does not transfer title; therefore, where raw cotton is purchased from an agriculturist through a Kacha Arhtia, the registered buyer is liable to pay GST under the reverse charge mechanism, while market fee obligations and auction procedures under the APMC Rules govern the transaction.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    The Source Rule in International Taxation: Tax Implications for Non-Resident Service Providers
    Show AI Summary
    Source rule protects payments for services used to earn income abroad from domestic taxation when characterised accordingly.
    Whether aircraft maintenance and repair by a non-resident constitutes technical services is addressed by reference to the specialised expertise, regulatory and safety obligations distinguishing such services from ordinary repairs; contemporaneously, retrospective statutory amendments clarifying taxation of fees for technical services are balanced against the source rule exception, under which payments for services used to earn income abroad are not taxed domestically.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Taxation of 'Success Fees' in International Transactions: The Nexus Doctrine: Situs of residence and...
    Show AI Summary
    Nexus doctrine: source based taxation requires a real territorial connection to tax cross border consultancy success fees.
    A "success fee" paid to a non resident for consultancy services characterized by human expertise constitutes a fee for technical services when there is a real and substantial connection between the income and India. The right to tax is allocated by the source rule: income is taxable in the jurisdiction where the economic source of payment is located. Parliamentary taxing power over extra territorial income is limited by the Doctrine of Territorial Nexus; only payments with a sufficient nexus to India are subject to tax at source obligations.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Home› TMI Notes › Bills › Act-Rules › Category › This
      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Bills

      Structured mechanism for treatment of losses from specified businesses in Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Comparison with Section 73A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

      10 April, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Print Options

      Clause 114 Set off and carry forward of losses from specified business.

      Income Tax Bill, 2025

      Introduction

      Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, and Section 73A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, both address the treatment of losses from specified businesses. These statutory provisions are crucial for taxpayers engaged in certain business activities, as they determine how losses can be offset against profits and carried forward to future tax years. Understanding the nuances of these provisions is essential for legal practitioners and taxpayers alike, as they impact tax planning and compliance. Clause 114 is a proposed update in the Income Tax Bill, 2025, aiming to refine the rules regarding the set-off and carry forward of losses from specified businesses. Section 73A, on the other hand, has been part of the Indian tax landscape since its insertion by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009, effective from April 1, 2010. This commentary explores the objectives, implications, and practical applications of these provisions, highlighting the differences and similarities between them.

      Objective and Purpose

      The primary objective of both Clause 114 and Section 73A is to provide a structured mechanism for the treatment of losses incurred in specified businesses. These provisions ensure that losses from such businesses are not indiscriminately set off against profits from other sources, thereby maintaining a level of integrity in tax calculations and preventing potential revenue loss to the government. Clause 114 aims to align with contemporary business practices and economic realities by updating the framework for loss set-off and carry forward. It seeks to provide clarity and consistency in the treatment of specified business losses, ensuring that taxpayers engaged in these businesses can plan their tax obligations with certainty. Section 73A was introduced to address similar concerns, providing a clear framework for the treatment of losses from specified businesses u/s 35AD of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This section was designed to promote investment in certain sectors by offering tax incentives, while also ensuring that the benefits are applied consistently across taxpayers.

      Detailed Analysis

      Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

      1. Set-off of Losses:- Clause 114(1) stipulates that any loss computed from a specified business during a tax year can only be set off against profits and gains from another specified business in the same tax year. This provision restricts the set-off to within the same category of business, preventing cross-category adjustments.

      2. Carry Forward of Unabsorbed Losses:- Unabsorbed losses from specified businesses can be carried forward to subsequent tax years. These losses can only be set off against profits from specified businesses in future years. This ensures continuity in the treatment of losses and allows businesses to utilize losses over time.

      3. Definitions:- Clause 114(3) defines key terms such as "specified business" and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business." The definition of "specified business" refers to activities listed in Section 46, while "unabsorbed loss" refers to losses not fully set off in the current tax year.

      Section 73A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

      1. Set-off of Losses:- Similar to Clause 114, Section 73A(1) states that losses from specified businesses can only be set off against profits from other specified businesses. This maintains the integrity of tax calculations by restricting set-offs within the same business category.

      2. Carry Forward of Unabsorbed Losses:- Section 73A(2) allows for the carry forward of unabsorbed losses to future assessment years. These losses can be set off against profits from specified businesses in subsequent years, with provisions for further carry forward if necessary.

      3. Reference to Section 35AD:- Section 73A specifically refers to specified businesses u/s 35AD, which includes capital-intensive sectors like infrastructure, cold chain facilities, and warehousing for agricultural produce. This linkage emphasizes the intention to promote investment in these sectors through targeted tax incentives.

      Practical Implications

      The provisions in both Clause 114 and Section 73A have significant implications for businesses engaged in specified activities. By restricting the set-off of losses to within the same category of business, these provisions prevent the erosion of tax bases through cross-business adjustments.

      This ensures that tax incentives are applied consistently and transparently. For taxpayers, understanding these provisions is crucial for effective tax planning. Businesses must maintain accurate records of profits and losses for each specified business, ensuring compliance with the set-off and carry forward rules. Failure to adhere to these rules can result in penalties and increased tax liabilities.

      Comparative Analysis

      While Clause 114 and Section 73A share similar objectives and structures, there are notable differences:

      1. Scope of Specified Business:- Clause 114 refers to "specified business" as defined in Section 46 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, whereas Section 73A refers to businesses u/s 35AD of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This difference in scope may lead to variations in the businesses covered under each provision.

      2. Legislative Context:- Clause 114 is part of a broader effort to update and streamline the Income Tax Act, reflecting changes in the economic and business landscape. Section 73A, however, was introduced as part of specific tax incentives for capital-intensive sectors.

      3. Potential for Future Amendments:- As a proposed bill, Clause 114 may undergo changes during the legislative process, potentially altering its provisions or scope. Section 73A, being an established part of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is more stable but may still be subject to amendments through Finance Acts.

      Conclusion

      Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, and Section 73A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, play vital roles in the tax treatment of specified business losses. By providing clear rules for the set-off and carry forward of these losses, they ensure the consistent application of tax incentives and prevent revenue loss through indiscriminate adjustments. While both provisions share similar objectives, the differences in scope and legislative context highlight the need for careful analysis and understanding by taxpayers and legal practitioners. As the Income Tax Bill, 2025, progresses through the legislative process, stakeholders should remain vigilant for potential changes that may impact the application of Clause 114.

      Full Text:

      Clause 114 Set off and carry forward of losses from specified business.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax
      Next ➔