Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
    6. Text Search
  6. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  7. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
    8. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search ❯
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether an amount received by an Individual (a co-parcener to the HUF) from this HUF would be taxabl...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Change in accounting policy - When is to be changed - What should be the basis for change in account...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Accrual of income - Scope of ICDS - If there is conflict between Section 5 and Section 145, which wo...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    ICDS - Accrual basis of Accounting - Accrual of income versus Receipt of income
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Bad debts out of income recognised on the basis of ICDS but not yet recognised in books of account
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Applicability of ICDS for the purpose of disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) and 40(a)(ia)
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Applicability of ICDS on TDS
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Maintenance of Books of accounts for the purpose of ICDS
    NotificationsGST
    Levy of GST - Reverse Charge on Legal Services - Services provided by an individual advocate includi...
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    Reversal of Input Tax Credit - In GST / VAT era, emergence of by-product which is exempt during manu...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassm...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether it is required to disclose a change in the accounting policies if it has no material effect ...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    ICDS-I provides that an accounting policy shall not be changed without ’reasonable cause’. The t...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Why does the marked to market loss or an expected loss shall not be recognised as per ICDS-I.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    When does an assessee is required to make disclosures of fundamental accounting assumptions as per I...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the scope of Going Concern as per ICDS I.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific discl...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, wh...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation a...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    When can a provision be recognized as per ICDS X.
❮
❯
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Open Link
    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether an amount received by an Individual (a co-parcener to the HUF) from this HUF would be taxabl...
    Show AI Summary
    Exemption for HUF distributions may not apply where clubbing rules apply, affecting taxability of co parcener receipts.
    Amounts received by an individual co parcener from the HUF are exempt in the hands of the assessee under the general exemption for such receipts, subject to the overriding provision dealing with clubbing or attribution of income which can limit that exemption.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Change in accounting policy - When is to be changed - What should be the basis for change in account...
    Show AI Summary
    Accounting policy change requires reasonable cause and substance-over-form treatment to reflect a true and fair view.
    Accounting policies must present a true and fair view of the state of affairs and income; treatment and presentation must follow substance over legal form; an accounting policy shall not be changed without reasonable cause, and any change must serve faithful representation for income computation and disclosure.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Accrual of income - Scope of ICDS - If there is conflict between Section 5 and Section 145, which wo...
    Show AI Summary
    Accrual versus accounting method: accrual-based charge under residency provisions overrides cash-basis bookkeeping for taxing income.
    Where income has become taxable under the substantive provision governing non-resident receipts, that charging provision prevails over a taxpayer's cash-basis accounting; Section 145 is a machinery provision to effectuate the charge and cannot be used to defeat or nullify the substantive charge so as to allow taxable income to escape tax.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    ICDS - Accrual basis of Accounting - Accrual of income versus Receipt of income
    Show AI Summary
    Accrual of income: recognition occurs when a vested right and debtor liability arise, not necessarily on actual receipt.
    ICDS I explains that accrual of income arises when a vested right to receive payment emerges and a corresponding liability is created on the other party; postponement or non-receipt does not prevent accrual, though non-receipt may justify separate deductions or claims. Accrual and arisal denote an inchoate right prior to actual receipt, while receipt denotes physical collection, and for tax accounting the existence of the right and the debtor's liability are the operative tests for accrual-based recognition.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Bad debts out of income recognised on the basis of ICDS but not yet recognised in books of account
    Show AI Summary
    Deduction for bad debts allowed where income recognised under ICDS but not recorded in accounts is later irrecoverable.
    Where a debt included in income on the basis of Income Computation and Disclosure Standards but not recorded in the accounts becomes irrecoverable, Finance Act, 2016 permits the debt (or part) to be allowed as a deduction in the year it becomes irrecoverable and deems that the debt has been written off in the accounts for the purposes of the deduction.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Applicability of ICDS for the purpose of disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) and 40(a)(ia)
    Show AI Summary
    Applicability of ICDS: timing of TDS entries determines whether expenditure is disallowable under TDS disallowance provisions.
    ICDS apply only to computation of income under Profit & gains from business or profession and Income from Other Sources. For Sections 40(a)(i) and 40(a)(ia), disallowance depends on whether tax was deductible and whether an entry creating that liability or deduction existed in the year expenditure was claimed; absence of such an entry negates disallowance, while prior-year deduction of tax prevents disallowance in the year of allowance.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Applicability of ICDS on TDS
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS exclusion from TDS timing: TDS deduction timing and taxable expenditure follow book credit or payment date.
    ICDS does not affect TDS mechanics: the time for TDS (date of credit in books or date of payment) and the expenditure amount subject to deduction are determined by the books of account or payment date, not by ICDS computation of allowable expenditure.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Maintenance of Books of accounts for the purpose of ICDS
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS compliance: prepare ICDS-based financials and reconciliations to ensure taxable income computation aligns with disclosure standards.
    Differences between accounting under ICDS and other accounting frameworks can materially affect taxable income and subsequent years' computations; taxpayers should quantify divergences and account for consequential tax adjustments. Practically, maintain parallel ICDS-based profit and loss and balance sheet statements and prepare a detailed reconciliation with primary accounting records to ensure all ICDS adjustments are considered. Auditors must certify that computation of total income complies with ICDS, making transparent documentation of adjustments and reconciliations necessary for audit certification and tax compliance.
    NotificationsGST
    Levy of GST - Reverse Charge on Legal Services - Services provided by an individual advocate includi...
    Show AI Summary
    Reverse charge on legal services broadened to include advisory and representational work under GST notifications.
    Corrigenda amend reverse-charge entries to treat "services provided by an individual advocate including a senior advocate or firm of advocates by way of legal services, directly or indirectly," as taxable, and add an Explanation that "legal service" includes advice, consultancy, assistance in any branch of law and representational services, thereby broadening the scope beyond representational services before courts, tribunals or authorities.
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    Reversal of Input Tax Credit - In GST / VAT era, emergence of by-product which is exempt during manu...
    Show AI Summary
    Reversal of input tax credit: sale of exempt by products triggers reversal under VAT/GST credit rules.
    Reversal of input tax credit is triggered by the sale of goods produced incidentally during manufacture, not by their status as by products. The statutory credit regime aims to prevent double taxation by granting input credit for inputs used in manufacture, but the legislature determines the extent and conditions of credit. A provision that uses the terms 'goods' and 'sale' does not distinguish by products from final products, so where the incidental output is marketable and sold for consideration, reversal rules apply.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassm...
    Show AI Summary
    Capital gain valuation under section 50C on transfer of contractual rights challenged as inappropriate and commercially onerous.
    Application of section 50C to a transfer of rights under a power of attorney, where no possession or control of the immovable property passed and no stamp authority value was adopted, was contested; the assessing officer's adoption of an enhanced valuation for computing short term capital gains was regarded as inappropriate and characterised as harassment, and that addition was reversed on appeal.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether it is required to disclose a change in the accounting policies if it has no material effect ...
    Show AI Summary
    Accounting policy change disclosure required when future material effect is expected; disclose at adoption and when it first becomes material.
    Change in accounting policies that has no material effect in the current previous year but is reasonably expected to have material effect later must be disclosed: (a) in the previous year in which the change is adopted; and (b) in the previous year in which the change has material effect for the first time.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    ICDS-I provides that an accounting policy shall not be changed without ’reasonable cause’. The t...
    Show AI Summary
    Change in accounting policy: permitted only for reasonable cause and where AS 5 requires it or improves financial presentation.
    A change in accounting policy will be treated as reasonable if it meets the criterion established by AS 5: the change is permissible only where it is required by statute, necessary for compliance with an accounting standard, or results in a more appropriate presentation of the enterprise's financial statements.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Why does the marked to market loss or an expected loss shall not be recognised as per ICDS-I.
    Show AI Summary
    Mark-to-market loss recognition barred under ICDS, allowed only if another ICDS or tax law permits.
    Mark-to-market and expected losses are not recognised under ICDS I unless another ICDS permits such recognition; the Accounting Standards Committee held that because anticipated profits are not recognised, parity requires that expected or mark-to-market losses also be excluded, while established tax-law precedent allows deduction for exchange fluctuation losses arising on revenue-purpose borrowings.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    When does an assessee is required to make disclosures of fundamental accounting assumptions as per I...
    Show AI Summary
    Disclosure of fundamental accounting assumptions required when Going Concern, Consistency or Accrual are not followed in tax reporting.
    ICDS I requires that where the Going Concern, Consistency and Accrual assumptions are followed no specific disclosure is required, but any departure from these fundamental accounting assumptions must be disclosed; the revised tax audit reporting format provides columns to record such disclosures.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the scope of Going Concern as per ICDS I.
    Show AI Summary
    Going concern assumption affects income computation and disclosure, requiring a different measurement basis if materially impinged.
    Going concern is the assumption that an assessee will continue operations and has no intent or necessity to liquidate or materially curtail business; it underpins periodic income computation and financial statements and applies in the absence of contrary information. Material uncertainties that cast doubt on going concern may impinge this assumption. ICDS I does not specify computation methods when going concern is not met; absent such mandate an assessee may follow the Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements and prepare statements on a different basis, affecting recognition, measurement and disclosure.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific discl...
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS disclosure requirements must be reported in tax audit reports and reflected in amended income tax return schedules.
    ICDS require disclosure of accounting policies and ICDS adjustments; the net effect must be disclosed in the Return of Income. Disclosures required under ICDS shall be made in the tax audit report in Form 3CD for taxpayers subject to tax audit, and no separate disclosure regime exists for those not liable to tax audit; return forms were amended to include a schedule ICDS.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, wh...
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS supremacy - where ICDS conflicts with CBDT circulars or press releases, the ICDS treatment prevails.
    Where ICDS provisions conflict with earlier CBDT circulars or press releases, the later ICDS provisions prevail for the period after they take effect; CBDT circulars and press releases are interpretative guidance binding on tax officers but not on taxpayers.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation a...
    Show AI Summary
    DTAA supremacy: ICDS governs income computation when the treaty is silent, non-conflicting, or specifies only tax rate.
    ICDS apply to non-residents claiming DTAA benefits only where the DTAA is silent, where there is no conflict between ICDS computation and treaty treatment, where the income falls outside the DTAA's scope, or where the DTAA fixes a tax rate but does not prescribe the method of computing the income, in which case ICDS governs computation.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    When can a provision be recognized as per ICDS X.
    Show AI Summary
    Recognition of provisions under ICDS X requires a present obligation, probable outflow of resources, and a reliable estimate.
    Recognition of a provision under ICDS X requires a present obligation from a past event, a reasonably certain outflow of resources to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate of the obligation amount; routine future operating costs must not be recognised as provisions.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Home› TMI Notes › Income Tax › Case-Laws › Category › This
      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Income Tax

      Stay of Tax Demand: Interpreting the Discretionary Power u/s 220(6) of the Income Tax Act

      20 August, 2024

      Contents
      Acts
      Plus +
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Print Options

      Comprehensive Analysis of the Judgement on Stay of Tax Demand u/s 220(6) of the Income Tax Act

      Reported as:

      2024 (3) TMI 773 - DELHI HIGH COURT

      Introduction

      This article provides a detailed analysis of a recent judgment delivered by the High Court concerning the grant of stay of tax demand u/s 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case revolves around the interpretation and application of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) Office Memorandums (OMs) dated February 29, 2016, and July 31, 2017, which provide guidelines for granting stay of demand at the first appeal stage.

      Arguments Presented

      The petitioner, an assessee, challenged the actions of the respondents (tax authorities) who had adjusted the available refunds against the outstanding tax demand for the Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19 without considering the petitioner's application for stay of demand u/s 220(6) of the Income Tax Act.

      The respondents relied on the CBDT's OM dated July 31, 2017, which stated that a stay of demand could be granted subject to the deposit of 20% of the disputed demand as a "standard rate." The respondents contended that the petitioner was obliged to tender or place evidence of having deposited 20% of the disputed demand before their application for stay could be considered.

      Discussions and Findings of the Court

      Interpretation of the CBDT Office Memorandums

      The Court observed that the CBDT OMs neither prescribed nor mandated the deposit of 15% or 20% of the outstanding demand as a pre-condition for granting stay. The OM dated February 29, 2016, specifically spoke of the Assessing Officer's (AO) discretion to grant stay subject to a deposit at a rate higher or lower than 15%, depending on the facts of a particular case.

      The Court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 5 & Ors. Versus M/s. LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. - 2018 (7) TMI 1905 - SC Order, which emphasized that the administrative circular (OM) would not operate as a fetter upon the power conferred on a quasi-judicial authority. The Court held that it would be wholly incorrect to view the OM as mandating the deposit of 20%, irrespective of the facts of an individual case.

      Discretion of the Assessing Officer u/s 220(6)

      The Court observed that the discretion vested in the hands of the AO u/s 220(6) of the Income Tax Act cannot possibly be viewed as being cabined by the terms of the OM. The Court relied on its previous decisions in AVANTHA REALTY LIMITED Versus THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL DELHI 2 & ANR. - 2024 (4) TMI 162 - DELHI HIGH COURT and Indian National Congress Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central-19 and Ors. - 2024 (3) TMI 669 - DELHI HIGH COURT, which reiterated that the 20% deposit mentioned in the OM is not liable to be viewed as an inviolate or inflexible condition.

      Principles for Granting Stay

      The Court discussed the principles governing the grant of stay pending appellate remedies, as laid down by the Supreme Court in BENARA VALVES LTD. & ORS. Versus CCE & ANR. - 2006 (11) TMI 6 - Supreme Court and Monotosh Saha Versus Special Director, Enforcement Directorate And Anr. - 2008 (8) TMI 9 - Supreme Court. The Court emphasized that while exercising discretion, factors such as prima facie case, undue hardship, and the likelihood of success must be considered.

      The Court also referred to the decision of the Allahabad High Court in ITC. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) , CUS. & C. EX., MEERUT-I - 2003 (10) TMI 70 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT, which provided a lucid explanation of the legal position concerning pre-deposit and the grant of stay.

      Analysis and Decision by the Court

      The Court held that the respondents had clearly erred in proceeding on the assumption that the application for consideration of outstanding demands being placed in abeyance could not have been entertained without a 20% pre-deposit. The Court found this stand to be thoroughly misconceived and wholly untenable in law.

      The Court observed that the respondents had acted arbitrarily in adjusting the demand for AY 2018-19 against available refunds without attending to the petitioner's application u/s 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, which was pending consideration.

      Consequently, the Court allowed the writ petition and remitted the matter to the respondents for considering the petitioner's application u/s 220(6) in accordance with the observations made in the judgment. The issue of the amount of refund liable to be released was directed to abide by the decision that the respondents would take pursuant to the Court's directions.

      Doctrine or Legal Principle Discussed

      The judgment primarily dealt with the interpretation and application of the CBDT Office Memorandums concerning the grant of stay of tax demand u/s 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the discretionary power vested in the Assessing Officer and the need to consider factors such as prima facie case, undue hardship, and the likelihood of success while exercising this discretion.

      Comprehensive Summary of the Judgment

      The High Court, in this judgment, clarified the interpretation and application of the CBDT Office Memorandums concerning the grant of stay of tax demand u/s 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the Assessing Officer's discretion to grant stay cannot be fettered by the terms of the OM, which merely provide guidelines.

      The Court emphasized that the Assessing Officer must consider factors such as prima facie case, undue hardship, and the likelihood of success while exercising discretion u/s 220(6). The Court found that the respondents had erred in assuming that the petitioner's application for stay could not be entertained without a pre-deposit of 20% of the disputed demand, as per the OM.

      The Court relied on various judgments of the Supreme Court and High Courts to elucidate the principles governing the grant of stay and the interpretation of the term "undue hardship." The Court remitted the matter to the respondents for considering the petitioner's application u/s 220(6) in accordance with the observations made in the judgment.

       

      Full Text:

      2024 (3) TMI 773 - DELHI HIGH COURT

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax
      Next ➔