TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
By creating an account you can:
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All TMI Notes
of of All TMI Notes
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court: Directors Need Specific Allegations for Liability in Cheque Dishonour Cases u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.</h1> The Supreme Court of India clarified the vicarious liability of directors in cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The case involved a dispute between two companies, where the complainant filed criminal complaints against the accused company and its directors. The appellant, a director, contested the complaints, arguing her non-involvement in daily operations. The Court ruled that mere allegations without specific averments on a director's role in company operations are insufficient for vicarious liability. Consequently, the Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the appellant, reinforcing the necessity for clear evidence of a director's responsibility in such cases.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 