Just a moment...
By creating an account you can:
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court advises High Courts to avoid writ petitions under Article 226 if effective statutory remedies exist, especially SARFAESI cases.</h1> The Supreme Court of India ruled that High Courts should generally refrain from entertaining writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution when an effective alternative statutory remedy is available, especially in cases involving the recovery of dues by banks and financial institutions under the SARFAESI Act. The Court highlighted the necessity of adhering to statutory mechanisms and respecting the finality of actions like confirmed and registered auction sales unless exceptional circumstances such as fraud or collusion are present. This judgment emphasizes judicial restraint and the sanctity of statutory remedies, with limited exceptions for writ jurisdiction.
TaxTMI