Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →By creating an account you can:
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
Union Budget 2024-25 (Full) + FINANCE (No.2) Bill, 2024
The existing provisions of section 251 of the Act specify the powers of the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the Commissioner (Appeals). Further, sub-section (1) of the said section provides that Commissioner (Appeals) shall have, inter-alia, the following powers in disposing of an appeal:
(a) He may confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment, in the case of an appeal against an order of assessment.
(b) He may confirm, cancel, or vary to enhance or reduce, the penalty order, in the case of an appeal against an order imposing a penalty.
2. Further, sub-section (4) of section 250 of the Act prescribes that Commissioner (Appeals) may seek the report from the Assessing Officer after making further inquiry, before disposing any appeal.
3. It has been found that in the best judgement cases, taxpayers remain non-responsive to the letters or notices issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer. However, they directly file the appeal to Commissioner (Appeals) against the relevant assessment order.
4. Considering the huge pendency of appeals and disputed tax demands at the Commissioner (Appeals) stage, it is proposed that the cases where assessment order was passed as best judgement case under section 144 of the Act, Commissioner (Appeals) shall be empowered to set aside the assessment and refer the case back to the Assessing Officer for making a fresh assessment. Further, it is proposed to make consequential amendment in section 153(3) of the Act in order to provide the time limit for disposal of cases which are set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals).
5. This amendment will take effect from the 1st day of October, 2024. It will be applicable to appellate orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) on or after 01.10.2024.
Full Text:
Empowerment to refer best judgement assessments back to Assessing Officer with a prescribed time limit for fresh assessment. The Bill proposes empowering the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside best judgement assessments made under section 144 and refer the case to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment, and proposes a consequential amendment to section 153(3) to prescribe a time limit for disposal of cases so referred; the amendment applies to appellate orders passed on or after the specified commencement.Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
TaxTMI