Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
    6. Text Search
  6. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  7. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
    8. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search ❯
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    NewsBills
    AMENDMENTS IN THE CUSTOMS ACT, 1962
    NewsBills
    EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE FINANCE BILL, 2022
    NewsBills
    Promoting Voluntary Tax Compliance and Reducing Litigation
    NewsBills
    Definition of the term “slump sale”:
    NewsBills
    Reduction of Goodwill from block of assets to be considered as ‘transfer’
    NewsBills
    Income-tax authorities for the purposes of section 133A of the Act
    NewsBills
    Amendment in the provisions of section 119 of Income-tax Act
    NewsBills
    Amendment in the provisions of section 263 of the Act
    NewsBills
    Amendment to sub-section (1A) of section 35
    NewsBills
    Consequential Amendments
    NewsBills
    Clarifying that application will be allowed only when its actually paid
    NewsBills
    Voluntary Contributions for the renovation and repair of temples, mosques, gurudwaras, churches etc ...
    NewsBills
    Taxation of certain income of the trusts or institutions under both the regimes at special rate
    NewsBills
    Providing clarity on taxation in certain circumstances
    NewsBills
    The provisions of section 115TD to apply to any trust or institution under the first regime.
    NewsBills
    Bringing consistency in the provisions relating to payment to specified person
    NewsBills
    Bringing consistency in the provisions of two exemption the regimes
    NewsBills
    Reference to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner (PCIT/CIT) for the cancellation of registrat...
    NewsBills
    Penalty for passing on unreasonable benefits to trustee or specified persons
    NewsBills
    Amendment in the provisions of section 179 of the Act
❮
❯
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Open Link
    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    NewsBills
    AMENDMENTS IN THE CUSTOMS ACT, 1962
    Show AI Summary
    Assignment of functions to customs officers affirmed, with limits, concurrent powers, revised advance ruling rules, and data protection.
    The Finance Bill expressly authorises the Board or the Principal Commissioner/Commissioner to assign functions to officers as proper officers, to impose conditions or limitations (including by territory or goods), and to allow concurrent exercise of powers. Section 3 includes DRI, Audit and Preventive formations within customs officers. Amendments also enable rules imposing additional importer obligations to counter undervaluation, revise advance ruling fees, withdrawal and validity, confirm sole jurisdiction of the original officer for reassessment after inquiries, and criminalise unlawful publication of import/export declaration data.
    NewsBills
    EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE FINANCE BILL, 2022
    Show AI Summary
    Customs duty definitions clarify types of cess and additional duties and state amendments take effect upon enactment.
    The memorandum defines principal customs charge types - Basic Customs Duty, Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess, Road and Infrastructure Cess, Health Cess, and Social Welfare Surcharge - links each to existing statutory provisions, notes clause numbers in square brackets refer to Bill clauses, and states amendments in the Finance Bill, 2022, take effect on the date of enactment unless otherwise specified.
    NewsBills
    Promoting Voluntary Tax Compliance and Reducing Litigation
    Show AI Summary
    Updated return scheme: voluntary disclosure with staged additional tax and required proof of payment for compliance.
    A voluntary updated return regime is proposed by inserting section 139(8A) permitting any person to furnish a prescribed updated return within twenty four months from the end of the relevant assessment year, subject to exclusions where it reduces tax or where specified enforcement actions or proceedings exist. The updated return must be accompanied by proof of payment of tax, interest, fee and an additional tax computed as a staged percentage of tax and interest payable; computation rules, credit adjustments and interest calculations are detailed in newly proposed section 140B, and related consequential amendments are proposed.
    NewsBills
    Definition of the term “slump sale”:
    Show AI Summary
    Slump sale definition amended to replace 'sales' with 'transfer', clarifying scope of transfers under tax law.
    The statutory definition of slump sale is amended to substitute the word "sales" with "transfer", clarifying that a slump sale means the transfer of one or more undertakings for a lump sum consideration without values being assigned to individual assets and liabilities, and the amendment is given retrospective effect to apply to the specified assessment year and subsequent assessment years.
    NewsBills
    Reduction of Goodwill from block of assets to be considered as ‘transfer’
    Show AI Summary
    Goodwill treatment: reduction from block of assets deemed a transfer, triggering capital gains consequences and cost adjustment.
    Goodwill is not a depreciable asset and where purchased its purchase price remains the cost of acquisition for capital gains computation, after reducing any depreciation previously claimed; reduction of goodwill from the block of assets is deemed a transfer for capital gains purposes and the clarificatory amendment applies retrospectively to the relevant assessment year and subsequent years.
    NewsBills
    Income-tax authorities for the purposes of section 133A of the Act
    Show AI Summary
    Income-tax authority definition revised to limit qualifying officers to those specified by the Board, altering entry-and-verification scope.
    The proposed amendment restricts the definition of income-tax authority to officers who are subordinate to the Principal Director General or Director General or Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner as specified by the Board, thereby limiting which subordinate officers may exercise entry and verification powers under the section; the amendment takes effect from 1 April, 2022.
    NewsBills
    Amendment in the provisions of section 119 of Income-tax Act
    Show AI Summary
    Relaxation of late filing fee enables administrative orders to relieve classes facing genuine hardship from mandated fee imposition.
    The amendment expressly adds the statutory late filing fee into the list of provisions for which the Board may, by general or special order, provide relaxation or relief for classes of incomes or cases; this enables the Board to issue orders to exempt or mitigate the fee for persons facing genuine hardships in filing returns on time.
    NewsBills
    Amendment in the provisions of section 263 of the Act
    Show AI Summary
    Revision powers under section 263 expand to permit review of Transfer Pricing Officer orders with mandated implementation timelines.
    Proposed amendments grant senior officers assigned transfer pricing jurisdiction power under section 263 to call for and examine TPO records and to revise TPO orders deemed erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Section 153 is modified so subsections (3) and (5) apply to TPO orders, a new subsection (5A) obliges the Assessing Officer to modify assessments in conformity with a TPO order within two months of receipt, and related implementation provisions are extended to such orders.
    NewsBills
    Amendment to sub-section (1A) of section 35
    Show AI Summary
    Deduction claimed by donor disallowed where donee fails to file statement of donations; amendment corrects drafting error.
    The amendment corrects sub section (1A) of section 35 to provide that the deduction claimed by the donor for donations to specified research associations, educational institutions or companies shall be disallowed unless the donee files the required statement of donations, aligning the rule with section 80G and taking effect retrospectively from April 1, 2021.
    NewsBills
    Consequential Amendments
    Show AI Summary
    Approval authority for trusts changed to Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, replacing prescribed authority references and procedural filing locus.
    Proposal to substitute references to the prescribed authority with Principal Commissioner or Commissioner in specified sub clauses and the nineteenth proviso of clause (23C) of section 10 to align textual references with the existing filing and approval regime for trust applications under the first regime; the amendment is corrective and consequential to prior 2020 changes.
    NewsBills
    Clarifying that application will be allowed only when its actually paid
    Show AI Summary
    Application of income: amounts by trusts treated as applied only when actually paid, with an anti-duplication rule preventing later claims.
    Explanatory provisions treat sums payable by trusts as application of income in the previous year in which such sums are actually paid, irrespective of when the liability arose under the trust's regular accounting method; a proviso bars treating a sum as applied in a later previous year if it has already been claimed as applied in an earlier year. The amendments apply prospectively to the assessment years following the implementation date.
    NewsBills
    Voluntary Contributions for the renovation and repair of temples, mosques, gurudwaras, churches etc ...
    Show AI Summary
    Voluntary renovation contributions may be treated as corpus if kept separate, used only for the specified purpose and properly invested.
    Trusts or institutions may, at their option, treat voluntary contributions for renovation or repair of notified religious places as part of the corpus, subject to conditions: application only for the specified purpose, no onward donations, separate identification, and investment in forms and modes specified under subsection (5) of section 11; violation of any condition renders the sum deemed income of the year in which the breach occurs. Parallel explanatory provisions are proposed for clause (23C) of section 10. Amendments are proposed retrospective to 1 April 2021.
    NewsBills
    Taxation of certain income of the trusts or institutions under both the regimes at special rate
    Show AI Summary
    Special-rate taxation of trust income under new provision: specified breach income taxed separately and no deductions allowed under the rule.
    Proposed amendments subject defined categories of trust or institution income to a special rate by treating only the part of income improperly applied, invested, accumulated or attributed as taxable specified income; disallow deductions or set-offs against such specified income; deem unutilised accumulated sums to be taxable in the last year of accumulation; and define specified income to include excessive accumulations, deemed income under accumulation rules, income rendered non-exempt for impermissible investments or benefit transfers, and income attributable to beneficiaries.
    NewsBills
    Providing clarity on taxation in certain circumstances
    Show AI Summary
    Deductible trust expenditure allowed when exemption denied, subject to prescribed conditions and exclusive tax treatment.
    Proposed amendments allow deduction of revenue (non capital) expenditure for the objects of a trust or institution when exemption is denied for specified non compliances, subject to conditions: expenditure must not be from corpus as at the last day of the preceding financial year, not from any loan or borrowing, not involve depreciation for an asset whose acquisition was treated as application of income earlier, and not be a contribution or donation. Section 40 and 40A provisions apply mutatis mutandis to determine such expenditure, and no other deduction, allowance or set off shall be permitted for that expenditure.
    NewsBills
    The provisions of section 115TD to apply to any trust or institution under the first regime.
    Show AI Summary
    Exit tax on trusts extended to first regime entities, covering conversions, mergers and asset transfers under the amended provisions.
    The Finance Bill proposes to extend Chapter XII-EB's exit tax provisions to trusts and institutions under the first regime by making Sections 115TD, 115TE and 115TF applicable to them, thereby subjecting conversions to non charitable status, mergers with non charitable or dissimilar charitable entities, and failures to transfer assets to a levy on accreted income; the amendment is effective from the commencement of the specified fiscal year and applies to subsequent assessment years.
    NewsBills
    Bringing consistency in the provisions relating to payment to specified person
    Show AI Summary
    Payment to specified person: income applied for their benefit deemed their income, anti benefit rules extended to first regime trusts.
    A proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 deems any income or property of a first regime trust applied for the benefit of a person in section 13(3) to be that person's income in the year of application; sections 13(2), (4) and (6) are made applicable to first regime trusts, aligning anti benefit and attribution rules across regimes.
    NewsBills
    Bringing consistency in the provisions of two exemption the regimes
    Show AI Summary
    Accumulation provisions alignment: consistent tax treatment for accumulated charitable income with prescribed conditions and deemed income triggers.
    The measure harmonises accumulation rules between the two exemption regimes by requiring a prescribed statement to the Assessing Officer, investment or deposit of accumulated funds in specified modes, and timely filing; it provides that accumulated income meeting these conditions is excluded from total income but will be deemed income of the last previous year of the accumulation period if misapplied, ceases to be invested as required, is not utilised within the stated period, or is credited or paid to another exempt trust or institution.
    NewsBills
    Reference to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner (PCIT/CIT) for the cancellation of registrat...
    Show AI Summary
    Cancellation of charitable registration: Principal Commissioner empowered to inquire and cancel approvals within a prescribed decision period.
    Amendments empower the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to call for documents, inquire into and, after hearing, cancel or refuse to cancel registrations or approvals of trusts, institutions and similar entities on finding one or more specified violations (including misuse of income, non incidental business income without separate books, non genuine activities, preferential religious benefit, or final non compliance with other laws). Orders must be forwarded to the Assessing Officer and the entity, and a six month statutory deadline governs decision making from the quarter end in which the first notice is issued.
    NewsBills
    Penalty for passing on unreasonable benefits to trustee or specified persons
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for passing on unreasonable benefits: trusts face penalties equal to the benefit for first offences and greater penalties for repeat breaches.
    The proposal inserts section 271AAE to penalise trusts or institutions that apply income for the benefit of trustees or specified persons: the Assessing Officer may impose a penalty equal to the aggregate amount so applied where the violation is first detected in a previous year, and a higher penalty where the violation is detected again in a subsequent previous year; this penalty is in addition to any other penalties under Chapter XXI and the amendments take effect for the relevant assessment year following enactment.
    NewsBills
    Amendment in the provisions of section 179 of the Act
    Show AI Summary
    Liability of directors of private company clarified as joint responsibility for tax, fees, interest and penalties if company recovery fails.
    Amendment renames the section title to Liability of directors of private company to reflect that directors are jointly and severally liable where tax cannot be recovered from the company, clarifies that this liability is not conditional on liquidation, and expands the Explanation so that the expression "tax due" expressly includes fees alongside penalty, interest and other sums payable.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Home› TMI Notes › Customs › Case-Laws › Category › This
      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Customs

      Supreme Court Verdict on Pre-Import Condition and IGST Exemptions: A Legal Analysis

      13 February, 2024

      Contents
      Notifications
      Acts
      Plus +
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Print Options

      Deciphering Legal Judgments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Case Law

      Reported as:

      2023 (5) TMI 42 - Supreme Court

      This case revolves around the contentious 'pre-import condition' under the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) and its implications on the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) exemptions for imports under Advance Authorizations (AA). This detailed commentary will dissect the legal intricacies and ramifications of the Supreme Court's decision on this matter.

      Introduction

      This case addresses the legal battle over the 'pre-import condition' imposed for claiming IGST exemptions on inputs imported under Advance Authorizations. The Supreme Court's judgment elucidates the balance between regulatory objectives and the interests of the exporting community within the framework of India's foreign trade policy and GST regime.

      Background

      The controversy originated from Notifications No. 33/2015-20 and No. 79/2017-Customs, both dated October 13, 2017, which mandated the 'pre-import condition' for availing IGST exemptions on imported inputs intended for export production. This condition was challenged for being arbitrary and unreasonable, leading to a legal challenge that culminated in the Supreme Court's examination of its validity​​.

      Analysis of Issues

      1. Legal Status of the 'Pre-import Condition': The Supreme Court scrutinized the 'pre-import condition' within the ambit of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) and the Handbook of Procedures (HBP), highlighting the statutory framework governing such conditions. The Court underscored the discretionary power of the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) in framing policies that regulate export-import trade in India​​.

      2. Rationale Behind the Condition: The imposition of the 'pre-import condition' was defended on the grounds of maintaining a balance between the benefits extended to exporters and safeguarding the revenue interests of the state. This condition aimed to ensure that the exemptions on IGST were accorded only to those inputs that were genuinely used in the production of goods meant for export​​.

      3. Contentions Against the Condition: Exporters argued that this condition was not only retrospective but also discriminatory, violating Article 14 of the Constitution. They contended that the condition unjustly differentiated between exporters, imposing undue restrictions on those who had already fulfilled their export obligations before importing the inputs​​.

      4. Judicial Reasoning and Decision: The Supreme Court, in its judgment, opined that the legislative and policy-making discretion must be respected, especially in complex economic matters where decisions are often based on experimentation. The Court emphasized the need for judicial deference to legislative judgment in the domain of economic regulation, holding that inconvenience caused to a section of assessees cannot trump the broader legislative intent​​.

      Discussion and Findings

      The Supreme Court's ruling sheds light on the intricate relationship between trade policies and taxation laws, especially in the context of GST. It reaffirms the principle that exemptions and conditions stipulated in fiscal statutes and policies are within the purview of legislative and executive wisdom. By upholding the 'pre-import condition,' the Court underscores the importance of ensuring that tax benefits are meticulously aligned with the actual usage of inputs in export production, thereby safeguarding the fiscal interests without necessarily compromising on the principles of fairness and equality.

      Conclusion

      The Supreme Court's decision in the Union of India & Ors vs. Cosmo Films Limited case represents a significant judicial stance on the compatibility of trade conditions with fiscal laws. By validating the 'pre-import condition,' the Court has reinforced the legislative intent behind the FTP and GST regime, aiming to streamline the export-import framework in alignment with the overarching economic policies. This judgment not only provides clarity on the legal standing of such conditions but also highlights the judiciary's role in balancing the interests of the exporting community with the broader objectives of economic policy and revenue protection.

      Effect of subsequent amendment in Policy:

      Retrospectivity

      In the legal discourse surrounding the 'pre-import condition' for availing exemptions from Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) and compensation cess under the Advance Authorization (AA) scheme, a critical point of contention arose regarding the retrospective application of the subsequent withdrawal of this condition.

      The High Court, upon examining the submissions and notifications, found the 'pre-import condition' to be impractical and, in essence, rendering the benefits of exemption from IGST and compensation cess illusory. It noted the challenges exporters faced due to this condition, especially in maintaining the import-manufacture-export cycle within the typical timeframes allowed by overseas buyers. Consequently, the High Court acknowledged the subsequent Notification No. 01/2019-Cus dated January 10, 2019, which omitted the 'pre-import condition', interpreting this move as an acknowledgment by the Union that it was in the public interest not to continue with this requirement for availing exemptions​​.

      However, the Supreme Court took a different stance on the matter of retrospective application of the withdrawal of the 'pre-import condition'. It emphasized that granting retrospective effect to the notification that withdrew the 'pre-import condition' would be impermissible in law. The Court highlighted that the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act contains no power to frame retrospective regulations, thereby implying that the withdrawal of the 'pre-import condition' could not be applied retrospectively to periods before the issuance of Notification No. 01/2019-Cus​​.

      This distinction between the High Court's interpretation and the Supreme Court's ruling underscores the complex legal considerations at play in determining the temporal applicability of policy changes. The Supreme Court's decision reflects a cautious approach towards retrospective application of laws and regulations, emphasizing the need for legal and procedural clarity in the administration of trade and tax policies.

       

      Full Text:

      2023 (5) TMI 42 - Supreme Court

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax
      Next ➔