Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Rate of income-tax in case of companies - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment Yea...
    Rate of income-tax in case of every local authority - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the As...
    Rate of income-tax in the case of ever firm (partnership firm) - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates -...
    Rate of Tax in case of co-operative society - Budget 2017-18 - Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment...
    Income Tax Rates - For the Assessment Year 2018-19 and Rates for deduction of tax at source from "Sa...
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    Classification of goods - Impact of use of punctuation mark
    Case LawsCustoms
    Withdrawal of Anti-Dumping Duty - Designated Authority has no power to give retrospective relief
    Meaning and scope of supply under GST (Part 2) - Import of services will be treated as supply and wi...
    Meaning and scope of supply under GST (Part 1) - Since CGST, SGST or IGST will be levied on supply o...
    Case LawsService Tax
    Whether the vessels or ships that are afloat are not goods and immovable property? - CESTAT says Yes...
    Case LawsService Tax
    Adjustment of excess paid service tax – rule 6(3) of STR, 1994
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Currency conversion using telegraphic transfer buying rate (‘TTBR...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Documents to be furnished for availing FTC
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) in case of MAT/ AMT
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Lower of the tax payable under the Act and DTAA
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Cases in which no FTC benefit would be available
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) shall be allowed if evidence & undertaking furnished within 6 months ...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Meaning of foreign tax
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - Benefit on proportionate basis
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Foreign Tax Credit (‘FTC’) - FTC benefit in the year in which income offered to tax
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Corporate tax rate differential for domestic companies introduced, with tiered surcharge rules and specified cess treatment applied.
    The Finance Bill revises company tax by setting a lower rate for domestic companies meeting a specified turnover threshold and a higher standard rate otherwise, while maintaining the existing rate for non-domestic companies. Tiered surcharge rates apply differently to domestic companies and to companies other than domestic companies, with marginal relief available. Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess remain generally applicable, but are not levied on tax deducted or collected at source for domestic companies and other residents under specified entries; both cesses still apply to salary TDS and to non-residents and non-domestic companies.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Rate of income-tax for local authorities remains unchanged; surcharge applies and marginal relief available for high-income local authorities.
    Rate of income-tax for every local authority is preserved at the level specified for the prior assessment year. Surcharge is imposed on local authorities whose income exceeds the high-income threshold, levied at a specified percentage, and marginal relief is provided to mitigate abrupt liability increases near that threshold.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Firm income-tax rate continues unchanged, with surcharge for higher-income firms and marginal relief available.
    The rate of income-tax applicable to every firm continues at the same level as for the preceding assessment year for assessment year 2018-19. For firms with total income exceeding one crore rupees, a surcharge is levied at twelve per cent, and marginal relief is available where applicable.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Co-operative society tax rates remain unchanged for the assessment year; surcharge applies to higher incomes and marginal relief provided.
    Rates of income-tax for co-operative society taxpayers remain the same as in the prior assessment year under the First Schedule of the Finance Bill, 2017. A surcharge applies to societies with higher income and marginal relief is provided to mitigate surcharge impact at threshold points.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Income-tax rate structure revised for salaries, advance tax and special cases with senior citizen slabs and surcharge.
    Part III of the First Schedule to the Finance Bill, 2017 prescribes the income-tax rates for deduction at source from salaries, advance tax computation and charging of income-tax in special cases for financial year 2017-2018. Tiered progressive rates apply to individuals, HUFs, AOPs, BOIs and specified artificial juridical persons. Distinct nil-tax thresholds and slab treatment are provided for resident individuals aged sixty to less than eighty and for those aged eighty or more. A surcharge of ten per cent applies within a defined high-income range and fifteen per cent above the higher threshold, with marginal relief available.
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Punctuation in statutory entries limits tax conditions, so excise levy applies only to specifically linked goods.
    Punctuation in statutory entries must be given effect; a colon and conjunctions in the schedule create a break separating "leather cloth and inferior or imitation leather cloth ordinarily used in book binding" from other goods, so the condition imposing additional excise duty in lieu of sales tax applies only to the latter group. Historical layout of the entry corroborates this limited reading, and absence of argument before the Tribunal does not estop application of the statutory construction.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Withdrawal of anti dumping duty: Designated Authority lacks power to grant retrospective relief; rescission is prospective.
    Designated Authority lacks power to recommend retrospective withdrawal of an anti dumping duty following a mid term review; where domestic producers ceased production and the authority recommended rescission, the government's rescission preserved prior acts, and the tribunal held no rule permits retrospective relief in review proceedings, so withdrawal operates prospectively.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Importation of services: subject to GST under reverse charge; potential double levy with customs needs exemption.
    Importation of services falls within the definition of Supply and is subject to GST under the reverse charge mechanism, creating potential overlap with Customs duty where transactions importing goods are contractually treated as services. Administrative or legislative clarification is needed to prevent concurrent levies, either by Customs exemptions for imports characterised as services or reciprocal GST relief where Customs duties apply. The draft also raises uncertainty about personal use exemptions limited to taxable persons and suggests extension or harmonisation of exemptions for non taxable persons.
    Act RulesGST
    Show AI Summary
    Scope of supply under GST includes consideration-based transactions, importation of services, and specified free supplies.
    The statutory definition of supply under the Model GST Law comprises three categories: supplies for consideration in the course or furtherance of business (sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal); importation of services regardless of consideration or business purpose; and specified supplies made without consideration as listed in Schedule I. Clause (a) targets domestic, consideration-based transactions; clause (b) treats importation of services as separately taxable; and clause (c) assimilates certain gratuitous transactions into the tax net via Schedule I.
    Case LawsService Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Classification of floating vessels as immovable property may exclude their sale from GST law taxation.
    The tribunal held that ships and vessels afloat are not 'goods' but are akin to immovable property because they cannot be severed from the waters; ships are goods only before launch, during breaking up, or when specifically the subject of a sale. As immovable property lies outside the GST domain under the constitutional allocation, this classification raises the question whether GST would apply to sale or supply of floating vessels-a point pending higher judicial scrutiny.
    Case LawsService Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Adjustment of excess service tax permitted as alternative to refund under liberal interpretation of procedural rules.
    A liberal reading of Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 permits adjustment of excess service tax paid against future liabilities when facts show an excess payment, rather than restricting the assessee solely to a refund claim, consistent with constitutional limits on taxation and the Revenue's concession of excess payment.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign tax credit conversion uses telegraphic transfer buying rate on the last day of preceding month.
    Foreign tax credit is determined by converting the currency of the foreign-tax payment at the telegraphic transfer buying rate applicable on the last day of the month immediately preceding the month in which that tax is paid or deducted.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign Tax Credit documentation: verified income statement plus certificate and payment or deduction proof to claim credit.
    Foreign Tax Credit eligibility requires a verified statement of foreign income and foreign tax paid in the prescribed form, plus a certificate or statement specifying the nature of the income and tax deducted or paid issued by the foreign tax authority, the person who deducted the tax, or signed by the taxpayer, accompanied by a tax challan or online payment acknowledgement for payments and proof of deduction where tax was withheld.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign tax credit allowed against MAT/AMT like normal tax, but any excess over normal provisions is ignored.
    Foreign tax credit under Rule 128 of the Income tax Rules, 1962, is allowable against tax payable under MAT or AMT in the same manner as under the normal provisions; any foreign tax credit available against MAT/AMT that exceeds the credit allowable under normal provisions is ignored when computing MAT/AMT credit.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign tax credit: credit limited to lower of domestic tax and foreign tax; treaty excess is disregarded.
    Rule 128 of the Income tax Rules, 1962 limits Foreign Tax Credit to the lesser of domestic tax chargeable on the doubly taxed income and the foreign tax actually paid, and directs that any foreign tax paid in excess of the tax payable under the applicable DTAA be ignored for credit computation.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign Tax Credit denial: no credit for domestic interest, fees or penalties and for disputed foreign taxes.
    Rule 128 restricts Foreign Tax Credit by disallowing FTC against interest, fees or penalties payable under the Income-tax Act, and by excluding any foreign tax (or part thereof) that is disputed by the assessee.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign Tax Credit requires evidence of settlement, proof of payment and an undertaking within six months of dispute resolution.
    Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) is allowed for disputed foreign tax only if, within six months from the end of the month in which the dispute is finally settled, the assessee furnishes evidence of settlement, evidence that the tax liability has been discharged by the assessee, and an undertaking that no refund in respect of that amount has been or will be claimed.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign tax definition determines FTC scope: DTAA-covered taxes apply, otherwise income-tax-type foreign levies qualify for credit.
    Definition of foreign tax for Foreign Tax Credit under Rule 128: where a DTAA exists, foreign tax is the tax covered by that DTAA; where no DTAA exists, foreign tax is the tax payable under the foreign country's law in the nature of income-tax as defined in the statutory explanation, including excess profits tax or business profits tax charged on profits by central or local authorities.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign tax credit proportionate allocation ensures foreign tax relief is apportioned when income is taxed across multiple years.
    Foreign tax credit under the Income tax Rules operates on a proportionate allocation principle when the same income is taxable in more than one year; the credit entitlement must be apportioned across the years in which the income is offered to tax so that relief for foreign taxes corresponds to the portion of income taxed in each year.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign tax credit allowed when foreign tax corresponds to income offered or assessed to tax in India in the same year.
    Foreign tax credit is available to Indian residents for tax paid in a foreign country or specified territory, and is allowed only in the year when the corresponding income is offered to tax or assessed to tax in India, creating a temporal link between domestic taxation of the income and recognition of the foreign tax credit.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Supreme Court Verdict on Pre-Import Condition and IGST Exemptions: A Legal Analysis

      13 February, 2024

      Contents
      Notifications
      Acts
      Plus +
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Deciphering Legal Judgments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Case Law

      Reported as:

      2023 (5) TMI 42 - Supreme Court

      This case revolves around the contentious 'pre-import condition' under the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) and its implications on the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) exemptions for imports under Advance Authorizations (AA). This detailed commentary will dissect the legal intricacies and ramifications of the Supreme Court's decision on this matter.

      Introduction

      This case addresses the legal battle over the 'pre-import condition' imposed for claiming IGST exemptions on inputs imported under Advance Authorizations. The Supreme Court's judgment elucidates the balance between regulatory objectives and the interests of the exporting community within the framework of India's foreign trade policy and GST regime.

      Background

      The controversy originated from Notifications No. 33/2015-20 and No. 79/2017-Customs, both dated October 13, 2017, which mandated the 'pre-import condition' for availing IGST exemptions on imported inputs intended for export production. This condition was challenged for being arbitrary and unreasonable, leading to a legal challenge that culminated in the Supreme Court's examination of its validity​​.

      Analysis of Issues

      1. Legal Status of the 'Pre-import Condition': The Supreme Court scrutinized the 'pre-import condition' within the ambit of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) and the Handbook of Procedures (HBP), highlighting the statutory framework governing such conditions. The Court underscored the discretionary power of the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) in framing policies that regulate export-import trade in India​​.

      2. Rationale Behind the Condition: The imposition of the 'pre-import condition' was defended on the grounds of maintaining a balance between the benefits extended to exporters and safeguarding the revenue interests of the state. This condition aimed to ensure that the exemptions on IGST were accorded only to those inputs that were genuinely used in the production of goods meant for export​​.

      3. Contentions Against the Condition: Exporters argued that this condition was not only retrospective but also discriminatory, violating Article 14 of the Constitution. They contended that the condition unjustly differentiated between exporters, imposing undue restrictions on those who had already fulfilled their export obligations before importing the inputs​​.

      4. Judicial Reasoning and Decision: The Supreme Court, in its judgment, opined that the legislative and policy-making discretion must be respected, especially in complex economic matters where decisions are often based on experimentation. The Court emphasized the need for judicial deference to legislative judgment in the domain of economic regulation, holding that inconvenience caused to a section of assessees cannot trump the broader legislative intent​​.

      Discussion and Findings

      The Supreme Court's ruling sheds light on the intricate relationship between trade policies and taxation laws, especially in the context of GST. It reaffirms the principle that exemptions and conditions stipulated in fiscal statutes and policies are within the purview of legislative and executive wisdom. By upholding the 'pre-import condition,' the Court underscores the importance of ensuring that tax benefits are meticulously aligned with the actual usage of inputs in export production, thereby safeguarding the fiscal interests without necessarily compromising on the principles of fairness and equality.

      Conclusion

      The Supreme Court's decision in the Union of India & Ors vs. Cosmo Films Limited case represents a significant judicial stance on the compatibility of trade conditions with fiscal laws. By validating the 'pre-import condition,' the Court has reinforced the legislative intent behind the FTP and GST regime, aiming to streamline the export-import framework in alignment with the overarching economic policies. This judgment not only provides clarity on the legal standing of such conditions but also highlights the judiciary's role in balancing the interests of the exporting community with the broader objectives of economic policy and revenue protection.

      Effect of subsequent amendment in Policy:

      Retrospectivity

      In the legal discourse surrounding the 'pre-import condition' for availing exemptions from Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) and compensation cess under the Advance Authorization (AA) scheme, a critical point of contention arose regarding the retrospective application of the subsequent withdrawal of this condition.

      The High Court, upon examining the submissions and notifications, found the 'pre-import condition' to be impractical and, in essence, rendering the benefits of exemption from IGST and compensation cess illusory. It noted the challenges exporters faced due to this condition, especially in maintaining the import-manufacture-export cycle within the typical timeframes allowed by overseas buyers. Consequently, the High Court acknowledged the subsequent Notification No. 01/2019-Cus dated January 10, 2019, which omitted the 'pre-import condition', interpreting this move as an acknowledgment by the Union that it was in the public interest not to continue with this requirement for availing exemptions​​.

      However, the Supreme Court took a different stance on the matter of retrospective application of the withdrawal of the 'pre-import condition'. It emphasized that granting retrospective effect to the notification that withdrew the 'pre-import condition' would be impermissible in law. The Court highlighted that the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act contains no power to frame retrospective regulations, thereby implying that the withdrawal of the 'pre-import condition' could not be applied retrospectively to periods before the issuance of Notification No. 01/2019-Cus​​.

      This distinction between the High Court's interpretation and the Supreme Court's ruling underscores the complex legal considerations at play in determining the temporal applicability of policy changes. The Supreme Court's decision reflects a cautious approach towards retrospective application of laws and regulations, emphasizing the need for legal and procedural clarity in the administration of trade and tax policies.

       


      Full Text:

      2023 (5) TMI 42 - Supreme Court

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax