Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
By creating an account you can:
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All TMI Notes
of of All TMI Notes
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Gold Smuggling Case Under Customs Act: Admissibility of Co-Accused Statements and Need for Corroborative Evidence Explored.</h1> The article analyzes a gold smuggling case under the Customs Act, 1962, focusing on the admissibility of co-accused statements and procedural compliance. The case involves the seizure of gold and an individual's arrest, with the primary evidence against the Appellant being the co-accused's statement. The legal framework highlights the need for corroborative evidence, as co-accused statements are considered weak under Indian law. The case underscores the presumption of innocence and the prosecution's burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It also points out procedural irregularities, emphasizing the necessity of fair trial principles and corroborative evidence in criminal cases.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 