Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1988 (5) TMI 67

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....made to the income returned by the assessee on account of value of samples left with him. The assessing authority referred to the past practice relating to the years 1979-80 and 1980-81 and treated 1/3rd of the samples as part of the closing stock. According to assessee, 893.300 kg. of yarn had been consumed by the assessee for samples, 1/3rd therefore came to 297.08 kg/. At the rate of Rs. 140 per Kg. a sum of Rs. 41,692 was added on account of value of suppressed closing stock. On appeal, the CIT(A) reduced this figure by Rs. 8737. The assessee is still dissatisfied and has challenged the maintenance of this addition in his own appeal and in the cross objection against the Departmental appeal in which the Department has objected to the re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....7 Not allowed . 2. Quality Control 58,098 -do- 45,000 3. Advertisement 51,167 -do- 30,000 4. MFHC Commission 10,338 -do- . 5. WWEP Commission 68,738 -do- . 6. Foreign tour 1,45,725 Allowed . 7. Export Promotion 58,915 Not allowed 25,000 8. Subscription 12,050 -do- 12,050 9. Free samples 2,648 -do- 2,646 The Department has agitated against the grant of weighted deduction under s. 35B in respect of items wherein the same has been allowed by the CIT(A) while the assessee has agitated and contended that the entire claim made by the assessee should have been allowed. So far as the Departmental ground is concerned, the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....goods, service of facilities are likely to be sold or provided by the assessee; (b) maintenance outside India of a warehouse for the promotion of the said outside India of such goods; (c) maintenance of a Laboratory or the facilities for quality control, or inspection of such gods; Provided that in a case where only part of the sale is made outside Indian, the amount of expenditure incurred on the maintenance of such Laboratory or other facilities which shall qualify for deduction under cl.(a) of sub-s. (1) of s. 35B shall not exceed the amount which bears the same proportion as the value of the turnover in respect of such exports bears to the turnover of the business in respect of which the laboratory or other facilities are maint....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd, therefore, the assessee's claim for weighted deduction in terms of r. 6AA deserves to assessment examined in respect of any assessment which would be pending on the date when the said rule was promulgated. The CIT(A) actually applied the rule and allowed weighted deduction to the assessee on some items. Since this is in accordance with the view taken by the Tribunal, we decline to interfere in the Departmental ground raised in this behalf. 5. In its own appeal, the assessee has further claimed weighted deduction in respect of items on which the same has not been allowed or only particularly allowed by the CIT(A). One such item is expenses incurred on sample designing. These, however are manufacturing expenses and no weighted deductio....