Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1985 (7) TMI 144

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed by the ITO is a sum of Rs. 18,331 and reduced by the AAC to Rs. 9,166. 2. There have been shifting explanations about the late filing of return given by the assessee and certain probabilities and possibilities indicate such as that normally returns are filed in time by the assessee and most probably this return was given to the Income-tax lawyer who might not have filed the same in time, as ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 4. We have dealt with an identical issue in the case of Piyara Lal Mehandiratta & Co. ITA No. 46/Chandi/84, dt. 25th May, 1984. Therefore, on that basis, we cancel the penalty. However, we are not going into the other reasons forwarded, though it is not clear as to how total penalty of Rs. 18,331 was reduced by the AAC to Rs. 9,166 as he took into consideration conduct of the assessee in respe....