Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1983 (1) TMI 127

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assessee installed new machinery of the value of Rs. 7,80,646. The assessee claimed development rebate at the rate of 25 per cent under section 33 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'). The ITO, however, allowed the development rebate at 15 per cent with the general observation that it was clear that section 33(1)(b) and Schedules under the Act did not permit development rebate to the assessee at the rate of 25 per cent. 3 to 5. [These paras are not reproduced here as they involve minor issues.] 6. The AAC did not accept the claim of the assessee that it was entitled to development rebate at the rate of 25 per cent. He supported the ITO as according to him, the assessee had not given any cogent verifiable basis or evidence to support th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ngaged in the manufacture of textiles wholly or mainly of cotton and any assessee who is manufacturing cotton yarn and hosiery and rope is entitled to development rebate at 25 per cent. It was emphasised that the Legislature in its wisdom has placed 'comma' after the words 'wholly or mainly of cotton', which indicates that the items subsequently mentioned are to be considered as independent of the first item, i.e., textiles. In other words, it was argued that hosiery, whether of cotton or wool, is entitled to development rebate at 25 per cent. It was further emphasised that hosiery is separate from the textiles in this context. Therefore, it is not warranted to deny the assessee development rebate at the rate of 25 per cent. Shri Gupta emph....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ar in the spinning unit, yet the business of the assessee is a composite one and spinning is only involved in one of the processes of manufacture of hosiery. It is, therefore, to be seen whether on these facts, the assessee is entitled to development rebate in view of the provisions of section 33(1)(b)(B)(i)(b) read with item 32 of the Fifth Schedule to the Act. Item 32 of the Fifth Schedule is as under : " Textiles (including those dyed, printed or otherwise processed) made wholly or mainly of cotton, including cotton yarn, hosiery and rope. " 15. A careful reading of item 32 shows that textiles if made wholly or mainly of cotton including those dyed, printed or otherwise processed, will by entitled to development rebate at 25 per cent, ....