TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1994 (2) TMI 104
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... and consequently nil advance-tax. In filing this estimate the assessee-company took into account the loss of Rs. 16,87,520 for the asst. yr. 1984-85 as per return filed on 18th June, 1984 and the loss of Rs. 3,38,860 for the asst. yr. 1983-84 as per return filed on 21st July, 1983. The ITO completed the assessment on 11th Jan., 1988 determining the total income at Rs. 45,85,583. He initiated proceedings for the levy of penalty under s. 273(2)(a) of the Act on the ground that the assessee filed an estimate of advance-tax which it knew or had reason to believe to be untrue. After considering the explanation of the assessee he imposed a penalty of Rs. 2,10,533. 3. On appeal it was noticed by the CIT(A) that as per the returns filed for the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he interest on advances would be assessed on accrual basis though its method of accounting in respect of such interest had been changed from accrual basis to cash basis. In this connection it was pointed out by him that in the asst. yr. 1984-85 the change in the method of accounting for interest was not accepted by the Departmental authorities and this position should have put the assessee on guard. He further submitted that the assessee's explanation is a mere self-serving statement which should not have been accepted by the CIT(A). 5. The learned representative for the assessee on the other hand submitted that the estimate showing nil income was filed bona fide on the basis of the position obtaining at the time of filing the same. Accor....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ther drew our attention to the noting made by the assessee's employee in the demand notice issued by the ITO under s. 210 of the Act to the effect that the profit of Rs. 13 lacs (approx) for the year will be wiped out by the loss of Rs. 16,87,524 claimed in the return for the asst. yr. 1984-85 and therefore nil estimate may be filed. This noting, according to him, showed that the position obtaining at the time of filing the estimate was kept in view by the assessee and it was only on that basis that the estimate was filed. Under these circumstances, according to him, the estimate cannot be considered as untrue and the assessee cannot be held guilty of having knowingly filed a false or untrue estimate. In support of his contentions, the lear....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... earlier to the filing of the estimate. The assessments for those years were completed subsequently. Those assessments had resulted in a loss for the asst. yr. 1983-84 but a profit for the asst. yr. 1984-85. The question now remains as to whether the assessee was justified in its belief that there would be a loss for the asst. yr. 1984-85. In the return for that year the assessee had claimed bad debt or trading loss of Rs. 21.57 lacs. That was disallowed in the assessment but the assessee kept the issue alive by taking it to the Tribunal. In the accounts for the asst. yr. 1984-85 the amount had been written off. The amount represented money paid to the bank on behalf of M/s Oriental Electric & Engg. Co. in respect of which the assessee stoo....