Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1987 (6) TMI 82

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is opposed by the department. 2. For the assessment year 1981-82 the ITO assessed the total income of the assessee at Rs. 22,72,530. On this amount the ITO calculated the tax payable as follows : I.T. @ 60per cent   Rs. 13,63,518 S.C. @ 71/2per cent   Rs. 1,02,264     Rs. 14,65,782 Less :Tax paid in advance Rs. 11,50,000 . Tax paid under s. 140A on 6-7-1981 Rs.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., set aside this assessment for fresh consideration before the ITO after going through the evidences as would be produced before him. The other grounds taken in respect of charging of interest u/s. 216 may also be looked into at the time of the hearing before him. 4. In the result, the assessment is set aside for making the fresh assessment and for statistical purposes this should be treated as a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e of fresh assessment of a set aside assessment ". This order was challenged in appeal in which certain other objections were taken, The CIT(A) was of the opinion that " the ITO is correct in refusing the claim of the appellant in this connection as this was a case of partial setting aside of the original order of assessment ". As such he confirmed the order of the ITO. Being aggrieved, the assess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ub-section does not include an order u/s. 251 made in compliance of an appellate order. 6. We have carefully considered the rival submissions and examined the decision relied upon by the authorised representative for the assessee. Before proceeding further it has to be stated that the department does not any longer rely on the reason given by the ITO (i.e. " this is not a case of simple reduction....