Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1987 (5) TMI 63

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 27,098. But no deposit was made on behalf of the assessee-deity under the Compulsory Deposit Scheme (Income Tax Payers) Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). As such the ITO initiated proceedings under s. 10 of the Act. An explanation was filed on behalf of the deity. But the ITO did not accept the explanation and imposed a penalty of Rs. 303. The appeal against the said penalty orde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e AAC. 3. On a careful consideration of the materials on record, facts and circumstances of the case, we find that the AAC dealt with the assessee-deity's objection as to the age of the deity. But it is quite apparent that the AAC did not consider the assessee-deity's objection as to the reasonable cause leading to failure to make the compulsory deposit due to the death of the managing shebait ....