Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1981 (1) TMI 116

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on is by the assessee against the refusal of the ld. CIT (A) to grant a relief of Rs. 6,940 claimed to be sales-tax liability relating to the asst. yr. 1970-71 but payable during the accounting year relevant to the asst. yr. 1977-78. 2. The assessee was served with demand notices by the STO to pay Rs. 7,982, Rs. 1,400 and Rs. 14,399 relating to the asst. yrs. 1971-72 1973-74 and 1974-75. The ass....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n sales were made. The ld. Authorised Representative relied on the order of the CIT (A). It is seen that these demands arose as a result of the assessments made by the ST Authorities who rejected the books of the assessee. Therefore, these demands did not arise when sales took place but later when the assessments were made. Since these assessments were made and demand notices served on the assesse....