Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1981 (2) TMI 110

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... according to him, the car was not used for the purpose of business. He, therefore, disallowed the entire claim for depreciation as made by the assessee. 3. Being aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Commr. (Appeals) who restricted the claim for deduction of depreciation to 75 per cent of the total claim as made by the assessee. 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee has come up in appeal before us. The ld. Rep. of the assessee contended that there was no question of the car being used for personal purpose by the assessee which is a limited Company. It was next pointed out that there were two directors of the assessee Company who had maintained their own cars and, therefore, there was no question of using the office....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uction as made by the assessee. The Commr. (Appeals) upheld the decision of the ITO. Hence this appeal. 7. For the reason set out in para 5 above we hold that the disallowance of motor car expenses and depreciation could be restricted to 1/10th of the total claim as made by the assessee 8. The next ground for asst. yr. 1977-78 relates to disallowance of interest under s. 40A(8) of the Act. The ITO while taking the assessment inter alia disallowed 15 per cent of a sum of Rs. 23,846 being interest paid by the assessee on deposits under provisions of s. 40A (9) of the Act. The ITO, however, has not given any reasons in support of this disallowance. 9. The Commr. (Appeals) in appeal upheld decision of the ITO and rejected the claim as mad....