Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1986 (7) TMI 150

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sp;                                    Rs.                                   Rs. (i) Sale of proceeds of 120     equity shares                                      3,24,000      Less : Market value as on      1-1-1954 (120 x 828.57)                        99,428                                      ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....                                                           (-)80,614                                                                                                     ----------------------------                                    &....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rned. 3. The audit note of the department brought to the notice of the ITO that since the original shares which the assessee had acquired prior to 1-1-1954 and which were settled on trust had not been received back by the assessee at the time of revocation and that since the shares that were sold were different from those original shares acquired by the assessee prior to 1-1-1954, the market price as on 1-1-1954 could not be taken as cost of acquisition and that cost at which the shares had been originally acquired should have been taken as cost of acquisition. The ITO treated this note as information received by him and reopened the assessment. The assessee objected to the reopening of the assessment on the ground that the said audit note could not form valid basis for reopening. The ITO held that material facts were not truly and fully disclosed at the time of original assessment and as such, he had jurisdiction to reopen the same under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'). He observed that since scrips of shares which were sold were not the same which were originally settled upon the trust, the assessee could not be said to be in possession of the scrips hel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t been disclosed at the time of original assessment. The fact that was allegedly withheld should have been clearly brought out by the ITO because it is only failure to state truly and fully the material facts by the assessee that confers jurisdiction on the ITO to reopen the assessment under section 147(a). If all material facts are fully and truly stated, the ITO is not entitled to reopen the assessment under that provision. In the present case, all the material facts were on record. The whole assessment filed was before the ITO. The trust has been revoked in 1963. There was a circular by the Government dated 12-5-1964 [F. No. 12/1/64-IT(AI)] addressed to all the Commissioners. The position was clarified in the following words : "Where one type of share is converted into another type of share (including conversion of debentures into equity shares), there is, in fact, no 'transfer' of a capital asset within the meaning of section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Hence, any profits derived from such conversion are not liable to capital gains tax under section 45(1) of the Income-tax Act. However, when such newly converted share is actually transferred at a later date, the cost ....