Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1986 (10) TMI 61

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red on 4-5-1971. Prior to his death, the WTO had issued him a notice under section 14(2) of the Act and the same was sent by registered post. That notice was returned undelivered by the postal authorities with the endorsement ' refused '. No return of wealth was filed by Shri Girwar Singh and as such, the WTO had completed the assessment under section 16(5) of the Act. Subsequently that assessment was set aside and the fresh assessment under section 16(5) was made describing the assessee as Kunwar Girwar Singh through Administrator General, Uttar Pradesh. It appears that at the initial stage, Shri Ajit Dhawan, Advocate had appeared in the proceedings before the assessing officer but subsequently, he too had remained absent. An appeal was pr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....want of complete address. On the other hand, the endorsement ' Refused ' indicates that the notice was in fact tendered to the addressee and he had refused to accept the same. There is a presumption that official and judicial acts are regularly performed. The postal authorities deliver the registered letters to their addressees in the ordinary course of business. There is nothing on record to indicate that there had been a deviation from the ordinary practice in the instant case. That being the position, a presumption arises that the notice in question was tendered to the addressee and since he refused to accept the same, the contents of the notice can be imputed to him. Thus, we find no force in the argument that the notice cannot be deeme....