1990 (6) TMI 88

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ny case which has been allotted to the Bench of which he is a Member and which pertains to an assessee whose total income as computed by the assessing officer in the case does not exceed Rs. 1 lac. . .." The assessee's submission, through the present miscellaneous petition, is that the aforesaid sub-section (3) should be so interpreted that it would also include cases where the assessment results in the determination of total income at a minus figure, i.e., losses, and if the loss in question exceeds Rs. 1 lac, a Single Member Bench will not be able to hear it. 2. The assessee had filed his return of income for assessment year 1982-83 showing loss of Rs. 92,46,920. The assessing officer completed the assessment on 24th September, 1984....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n of the learned counsel for the assessee was that income would include loss also for the purpose of assessment and, therefore, the words 'total income' would also cover loss figure. 5. In our opinion, the assessee's submission deserves to be rejected because a plain reading of sub-section (3) of section 255, extracted above, indicates that a Single Member Bench of the Tribunal can hear all those appeals, where total income determined by the assessing officer does not exceed Rs. 1 lac. The aforesaid phraseology does not suggest that the figure of Rs. 1 lac mentioned in the section should be understood in the Algebraical sense of either being a plus figure or a minus figure. The clause "total income does not exceed Rs. 1 lac" leaves a cle....