Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1981 (1) TMI 84

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd polishing at Surat. He comes originally from Bhavnagar District. The ITO found that there were following cash credits in the books of the assessee: (i) Rs. 25,500 Keshavlal Mulji (ii) Rs. 22,000 Dharmeshi Premji (iii) Rs. 25,000 Bhavan Odhavji . Rs. 72,500 . 2. For reasons stated the ITO held that these cash credits were not established and added total of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....thern Bengal Jute Trading Co. Ltd. vs. CIT (1968) 70 ITR 407 (Cal). Shri Harne stated that the Department would be justified in relating the cash credits as unexplained investments. 5. Shri K.C. Patel the ld. counsel for the assessee pointed out that the credits were agriculturists and were persons of fairly good means. Their land holdings were fairly substantial. They had also irrigation facil....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ut once he has shown that they were received from a particular person and that person has accepted the transaction, the burden shifts on the Revenue. The Revenue can certainly show the so called creditors were not persons of adequate means in relation to the amount involved; the Revenue can also show that such transaction in fact did not take place. In this very case however, Revenue has not shown....