Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2005 (4) TMI 227

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... supplied certain quantities on free of cost to their distributors. In other words, the scheme amounts to a quantity discount scheme. Initially, the scheme was effective from 10-3-97 to 26-4-97. However from time to time, the scheme was extended for further periods. The last Para of the said Circular reads as follows :- "Please note no credit notes will be given on schemes. In case you are holding stock, you are advised to give scheme on the stock you are holding and place the order for similar amount with the company where we shall give you scheme. The stock which you have given on scheme should be replenished with the stocks which you will receive on scheme from the company." As can be seen, initially when the scheme was started, the di....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h no such clause was there in the subsequent circulars issued from 31-3-98 onwards, the same does not change the nature of transaction. (3)        All the relevant materials placed on record including the circulars and also the quantity given as quantity discount being specifically indicated in the invoices itself have been totally ignored and brushed aside. (4)        No evidence has been adduced to establish that what was given as free supply is only for replenishment of the stock as assumed while passing the order particularly for the period from 1-4-98 onwards and up to March 2000. (5)        The said discounts claimed as quantity....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (T). (ix)       CCE v. Nilkamal Plastics - 2004 (172) E.L.T. 83 (T) (x)        CCE v. Havell's Electronics - 2004 (174) E.L.T. 363 (T) 5. The learned SDR fairly conceded the point that quantity discount if it is known at the time of clearance of the goods is definitely admissible. 6. We have gone through the facts of the case. The duty demand covers the period from April 1998 to March 2000. On going through the circular issued, it is very clear that what is given by the appellants to the distributors is only quantity discount. Initially, when the scheme was started the distributors were advised to go with the scheme using the stock which they held. This stock was to be re....