Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2026 (9) TMI 402

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard Sri Aman Ji Agarwal, learned counsel, holding brief of Ms. Pooja Talwar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Shashi Kant Mishra, learned Standing Counsel representing respondents No. 1 & 2, and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has arisen from the proceedings under Section 129(3) of the U.P. Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 (in brevity &#....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....has not properly been adverted to by the appellate authority while deciding the appeal. It is next submitted that although the appeal is provided under Section 112(1) of the GST Act to be preferred before the appellate tribunal, however, owing to non-functional of appellate tribunal, the petitioner has approached this Court in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on 129 (3) of the GST Act and the order dated 30.11.2023 passed by the Additional Commissioner Grade-2 (Appeal)-II, Commercial Tax, Bareilly (respondent no.2) shall remain stayed provided that the petitioner deposits 30% of the penalty/demand within three weeks from today. It is made clear that the amount already deposited by the petitioner before the first appellate tribunal shall be adjusted in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ate Tribunal. 6. Learned Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the submissions advanced by the learned Standing Counsel. 7. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the instant writ petition pending before this Court. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of this Court, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the insta....