TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2026 (8) TMI 1593
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....held the order of the original authority granting refund of Cenvat Credit to the respondent. 2. The brief facts are that, during audit of the records of the respondent for the period September, 2007 to September, 2010, it was noticed that the respondent had availed Cenvat Credit amounting to Rs. 68,99,570/- in respect of capital goods on the strength of photocopies/zerox copies of invoices. On being pointed out during audit, the respondent reversed the entire amount. 3. Thereafter, the respondent filed a refund claim dated 01.08.2011 for Rs. 56,16,500/-. 4. A Show Cause Notice dated 24.10.2011 was issued proposing rejection of the said claim. Subsequently, another refund application dated 22.11.2011 was filed for Rs. 9,40,499/-, wh....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed document would become redundant and would also create the possibility of more than one person/unit availing credit on the strength of the same invoice. Revenue has relied upon Mihir Textiles Ltd., Vs Collector of Customs, Bombay, 1997 (92) E.L.T. 9 (SC), the contend that where a fiscal benefit is dependent upon compliance with prescribed conditions, such benefit cannot ordinarily be granted without fulfillment of those conditions. The Supreme Court in Mihir Textiles Ltd., supra, emphasized compliance with conditions attached to a concession fiscal treatment. Reliance has also been placed on Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh Vs. M/s Chandra Laxmi Tempered Glass Co. Pvt Ltd., 2009 (234) E.L.T. 245 (H.P.), in support of the proposi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Cenvat scheme have an important purpose, namely to establish payment of duty, receipt of the goods or services, identity of the recipient and to guard against duplicate or fraudulent availment. 13. At the same time, the question whether non-production of an original document necessarily results in denial of substantive credit cannot be decided in the abstract. The nature of the defect, the reason for nonproduction, availability of secondary evidence and, most importantly, whether the essential conditions for availment of credit are independently established, are relevant considerations. In the present case, both the authorities below have concurrently recorded that there was a reasonable explanation for the non-production of original inv....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... to have been independently verified. The decision, therefore, does not require denial of credit merely because the original piece of paper is unavailable despite the genuineness of the underlying transaction being established. 16. We also find that judicial decisions on Cenvat Credit have recognized that the credit may, depending upon the facts, be allowed on a copy of the prescribed document when its authenticity and the underlying transaction stand satisfactorily verified. For instance, in the case of Rallis India Ltd., supra, the Tribunal noticed that although credit had been taken on a photocopy of a bill of entry, the copy was certified by the Customs Authority and was supported by other contemporaneous records such as transport do....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....garding loss/non-availability of the invoices are sanctioned the refund only after holding that the respondent was entitled to the credit. The Commissioner (Appeals), independently affirmed that finding. Revenue has not placed before us any specific material demonstrating that these concurrent factual findings are per-versed or factually incorrect. 20. Another material aspect is that the credit had initially been reversed by the respondent upon objection during audit. Such reversal, by itself, does not amount to a final adjudication that the credit was inadmissible. When the respondent subsequently sought refund/re-credit, its substantive eligibility had necessarily to be examined on merits. The Original Authority did so and concluded in....