Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (2) TMI 262

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he impugned order in original passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise. Vide the impugned order the Commissioner imposed a penalty of Rs. 3.50 lakhs on the appellants. The ground for imposition of penalty was that the appellants had taken credit of Modvat in respect of capital goods even before their installation in their factory. The capital goods were received in the factory of the appellant....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....out the issue of show cause notice, imposition of penalty is not warranted. They placed reliance on the judgment of the CEGAT reported in 2003 (156) E.L.T. 753 (Tri - Chennai) in the case of EID Parry (I) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai. 2. Heard both sides. 3. I have considered the rival submissions. In this case it is noticed that though the appellants had raised the credit ....