Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (6) TMI 63

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Member (T)]. - This appeal is directed against imposition of a penalty of Rs. 60 Lakhs on the appellant M/s. Shaw Wallace & Co. The imposition of penalty has been done under 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The penalty on the appellant has followed a finding that a differential duty of over Rs. 3 crores was payable by the appellant's subsidiary M/s. Super Cosmetics (P) Ltd. in respect of s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that the appellant's case is covered by this Tribunal's decision in the case of Chemo Pulp Tissues v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut reported in 2000 (119) E.L.T. 715 (Tri. - LB). The learned Counsel further submitted that the question of penalty under 209A arose only in cases where goods were liable to confiscation and a person dealt with such goods knowing them to be liable to confiscat....