Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2026 (5) TMI 1461

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Income-tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), dated 02.02.2024, for Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. Grounds taken by the assessee are reproduced as under: 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in partly confirming the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, amounting to penalty relatable to additions of Rs. 8,39,252/- (tenancy rights) and Rs. 81,898/- (interest income). 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) failed to appreciate that the penalty proceedings are distinct from assessment proceedings and mere acceptance or withdrawal of quantum appea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) exceeded his appellate jurisdiction in confirming the penalty on issues for which no clear and specific satisfaction was recorded by the Assessing Officer. By sustaining penalty on selected additions, the Ld. CIT(A) effectively assumed the role of the Assessing Officer, which is impermissible under the scheme of the Act. 3. By the present appeal, assessee is contesting levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) amounting to Rs. 6,50,000/- on addition made of Rs. 8,39,252/- in respect of tenancy rights u/s. 50C and on Rs. 81,898/- in respect of interest earned on FDs. Fact of the case are that assessee filed return of income on 31.07.2013, reporting total income at Rs. 3,56,496/-. Assessment was completed u/s. 143(3) whereby total income was assess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uently, impugned penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c) was passed, dated 02.02.2024, levying penalty of Rs. 6,50,000/- on the additions made in the course of assessment. Against the imposition of the said penalty, matter went into first appeal, whereby penalty on addition made in respect of long term capital gain on sale of property u/s. 50C was deleted for which ld. CIT(A) held that this addition was purely on account of deeming fiction and that the said valuation was supported by the valuation done by the ld. DVO. However, penalty on the two other additions in respect of long term capital gain on tenancy rights u/s. 50C and interest income on FDs was confirmed. Assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal in respect of the penalty confirmed for the t....