2002 (2) TMI 290
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... against order in Appeal No. 169/2001 (CBE) (GVN), dated 6-8-2001 in which the Commissioner (Appeals) has modified the order of the duty from Rs. 2,07,825/- to Rs. 1,97,926/-. He had also held that since they have already paid Rs. 1,88,201/-, they have to pay the balance amount of Rs. 9,727/- only. They have also been directed to pay the interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act. Statu....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t is allowed, then the duty incident would come down considerably. He has, therefore, submitted that this case may be remanded back to the original authority for allowing them to avail Modvat credit in view of the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in the case of Formica India Division v. CCE (supra). 3. Appearing on behalf of the Revenue, the ld. SDR submitted that he has no objection, if this ....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI