Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (8) TMI 236

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....denied Modvat credit totally amounting to Rs. 4,24,601/- availed by them during the period from April, 95 to June, 95 on the structural steel items viz., CHN Channels, FLTS Plain Plates, Chequerred Plates, JSTI Joists and Angles, etc., as capital goods under Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944. The appellants claimed that these are plant items and are used in the mounting and installation of ma....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....because these are construction materials required for stationing the machinery on a foundation and that the foundation for erecting machinery cannot be construed to produce or processing the goods and therefore, cannot be treated as capital goods. 2. The party filed an appeal but the Commissioner (Appeals), Chandigarh vide his Order dated 3-1-2001 rejected the appeal of the party. 3. This is an ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... CCE & C, Nagpur - 2002 (50) RLT 109 (CEGAT-Mum.) 4. Shri H.C. Verma, JDR appearing for the respondents has relied on the decisions of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Rosa Sugar Works v. CCE - 1999 (114) E.L.T. 950 (T) and M/s. Nava Karnataka Steels Ltd. v. C.C.E., Belgaum - 2000 (123) E.L.T. 913 (T). The Tribunal in these decisions has held that the credit on the CTD bars, angles, channels, pl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he submissions made before me. It is observed that the Tribunal has taken a consistent view in respect of the structural materials which are used for erecting and fabrication of the machinery that they are in the nature of building material and would not qualify for the benefit of Modvat credit as capital goods. Though there are some conflicting decisions also on the subject, but, they are almost ....