AI OCR 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2026 (5) TMI 65
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....assed in W.P.No.11154/2023, in light of which, the exercise of adjudication was directed to be redone. The observations made in the aforesaid order at para-3 onwards till para-5 are extracted below for reference: "3. The observations made in the order dated 03.07.2024 passed in W.P.No.11154/2023 and connected petitions, reads as follows:- "These petitions have been filed calling in question the action of the respondent Department in issuing show-cause notice or having passed the orders-in-original relating to demand sought to be raised under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 relating to service tax liability. 2. In all these matters, the proceedings by way of show-cause notice under the Finance Act for service tax liability have been initiated on the basis of inputs received from the Central Board of Direct Taxes on the basis of Form 26AS/Income Tax returns filed. 3. The details of the writ petitions and the stages are as follows: Challenge to Show-cause Notice Challenge to Orders-in-Original Column No.1 Column No.2 WP No.16891/2022 WP No.12840/2023 WP No.13445/2023 WP No.15832/2022 WP No.15959/2021 WP No.3318/....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....axes) as per the assessee's Income Tax returns. The Service Tax Levy is on the taxable services provided by one person or Entity to another, in terms of the provisions contained in the Finance Act, 1994 and the rules made thereunder. 2. I submit in these batch of Writ Petitions, there are cases pertaining to various categories of Services. It is submitted that a Memorandum of understanding was signed between the Central Board of Direct Taxes and the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs on 21.07.2020 for the data exchange between the two Departments. This Memorandum of Understanding was signed for regular exchange of data which would help both the departments to keep a track on the tax evasion, which have not been reported under the Law. 3. I submit that all the petitioners have averred that the Show Cause Notices (SCN) were issued without the application of mind and further that the department has not verified the books of account and only on presumption have issued these Show Cause Notices. This averment of the petitioner is denied as false, as the department has taken utmost care by applying its mind and by examining the data received from the CBDT. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he third party information that is furnished by the IT department. The information need not be confined only in respect of information provided by the assessee. The object of sharing the data by the C.B.D.T to C.B.E.C (Now C.B.I.C) is to keep track of the statutory compliances by various categories of assessee. Hence there is no irregularity or illegality in relying upon the date obtained from the Income Tax department. 7. I state that the provisions of the Finance Act 1994 or Service Tax Rules do not contemplate any enquiry before issuing a show cause notice. No such procedure is contemplated either under the act or rules. The only preliminary enquiry to be undertaken was to examine the data obtained from the C.B.D.T, issue of intimations/ letters calling upon the assessees' to furnish their documents which are necessary to determine as to whether the assesses had provided taxable service and whether the activity of the assessee falls under the category of the taxable service or non-taxable service. 8. I further submit that, in many of the writ petitions the assessees' did not respond to the letters issued by the department seeking documents/information/c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... No. of assesses who agreed to the department's contention and paid the tax liability to the exchequer before/after the issuance of the Show Cause Notice. 587 Out of the 49,665 references received from CBDT a major portion i.e. 61% demands have been dropped and only 39% of the cases have been confirmed which shows that quasi-judicial authorities have taken independent decisions on merit. Where ever the demands were confirmed the aggrieved party have an appellate remedy under the Law. 10. I submit that when 587 assessees have complied with the law & paid up the taxes confirmed, grant of any relief to the present petitioners will put the compliant taxpayers into a disadvantageous position. Therefore, it is submitted that the quasi-judicial authority has taken independent decisions based on facts & law. When department has acted upon CBDT data to examine tax compliance all over the country, granting any relief to the petitioners in Karnataka alone will amount to disadvantage to the tax payers who have complied with the law. 11. I therefore submit that this Hon'ble High Court may direct the petitioners to appear before the quasi-judici....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pen. It is also clarified that wherever, replies to show-cause notice have not been made out, the same may be filed upon matter being relegated as noticed above. 13. Accordingly, the following: ORDER In light of observations made above, the writ petitions relating to challenge to show-cause notice, such matters will stand relegated to the officers to be designated in terms of the observations made in para 8 above, at the same stage. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 5 in Column No.1 of the table relating to challenge to show-cause notice are disposed off. Insofar as such writ petitions as detailed in Column 2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in- Original, in light of the discussion made above, the Orders-in-Original stand set aside and the matters are relegated to the Officers to be designated to be reconsidered from the stage of show-cause notice. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 35 in Column No.2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original are disposed off. The petitioners who are now relegated before the authorities concerned are at liberty to file their pleadings within a reasonable t....