2002 (1) TMI 234

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., learned Counsel produces TR-6 challan showing the deposit of Rs. 82,235/- as directed in the Stay Order No. S/17/2002/NB(D), dated 13-12-2001. 2. The issue in this case is whether the concessional rate was applicable to the imported goods in terms of Notification No. 34/98, dated 13-6-98 superseded by Notification No. 56/98-Cus., dated 1-8-98. Since the issue stood decided by the Tribunal in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ities below held that the benefit of Special Additional Duty of Customs was not admissible to the appellants. Accordingly, the demand of duty was confirmed, interest was also charged and penalty of Rs. 82,235/- was imposed. 4. Arguing the case for the appellants Shri H.S. Mew, learned Counsel submits that same issue came up before the Tribunal in the case of Tarsem Singh Multani & Sons and the ....