AI OCR 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2026 (4) TMI 1804
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....oda, Sr. Adv., Mr. Naman Saraswat, Adv., Mr. Tavinder Sidhu, Adv., Mr. Vikas Soni, Adv., Mr. Kanav Singhal, Adv., Ms. Kamini Sharma, Adv., M/s. M. V. Kini & Associates, AOR. JUDGMENT PER ALOK ARADHE, J. 1. This appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) has been preferred by SBI Consortium comprising State Bank of India, Bank of India, UCO Bank, Syndicate Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce and Indian Overseas Bank. The appeal arises from the order dated 14.10.2022 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), whereby the order dated 02.03.2021 passed by National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) was affirmed and the appeal was dismissed. 2. This appeal raises important question regarding validity and enforceability of corporate guarantees within the framework of the Code. The challenge mounted by respondents to the validity of the said corporate guarantees has been made on several grounds, namely, the timing and circumstances of the execution of guarantee, the alleged absence of proper disclosure in financial statements, the manner of their verification, the corporate insolvency resolution process and to their alleged insufficienc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....stence and validity of the guarantees and declined interference by External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) lenders. 9. The Security Trustee, by a communication dated 18.03.2019, informed the ECB lenders that they should pursue their grievance with the borrowers and had no right to question rights of SBI consortium. The Advocates for the RITL advised the counsel of Doha Bank admitting the execution of the guarantees and stating that the existence of such guarantees had been disclosed by RCOM in their financial statements/annual reports. 10. On 30.04.2019, the NCLAT allowed the withdrawal of the appeal and directed NCLT to proceed with CIRP. On 07.05.2019, the IRP issued fresh public announcement inviting claims. CLAIMS AND PROCEEDINGS BEFORE NCLT 11. On 17.05.2019, the appellant submitted a claim to IRP in Form 'C' for Rs.3,628.67 crores. On 24.05.2019, the IRP issued notices to financial creditors and members of the suspended Board of Directors of CD to attend the first meeting of Committee of Creditors (CoC) scheduled on 30.05.2019. 12. By a communication dated 28.05.2019, Doha Bank sought a declaration from IRP that the corporate guarantees were preferential, underval....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... (vii) the timing and manner of the corporate guarantees were questionable as corporate debtor and holding companies were already in default. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed. In the aforesaid factual background, this appeal arises for our consideration. SUBMISSIONS 16. Learned senior counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellants are financial creditors of the CD on the basis of Corporate Guarantees and a Deed of Hypothecation. It is contended that liabilities arising from the guarantees constitute financial debt under Section 5(8) of the IBC and the claims of the appellant were verified by the Financial Creditors leading to formation of Committee of Creditors (CoC). It is pointed out that counsel for CD has admitted execution of the Corporate Guarantee and that disclosures have been made by them in their financial statements on an ongoing basis. It is contended that the present corporate guarantee is not covered under Section 85 of the Companies Act. 17. It is pointed out that as per RBI Circular dated 01.07.2015, relating to asset classification and provisioning pertains to advances, in case of restructuring, the asset classification will be reckoned fr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....become "financial debt" for the purpose of Part II of the Code, the essential elements of disbursal, and that too against the consideration for time value of money, needs to be found in the genesis of any debt before it may be treated as "financial debt" within the meaning of Section 5(8) of the Code. This debt may be of any nature but a part of it is always required to be carried, or corresponding to, or at least having some traces of disbursal against consideration for the time value of money^4. Under Section 5(7) of the Code, a person can be categorized as a financial creditor if a financial debt is owed to it. Section 5(8) of the Code stipulates that the essential ingredient of a financial debt is disbursal against consideration for the time value of money^5. A liability arising from the corporate guarantee squarely falls within the ambit of financial debt as defined under Section 5(8) of the Code. The amount of any liability in respect of any of the guarantees for money borrowed against the payment of interest is a "financial debt" within Section 5(8) of the Code^6. It is well settled legal proposition that a guarantor incurs a coextensive liability with that of a principal bo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d from the date when it became NPA on the first occasion. However, such advances restructured on second or more occasion may be allowed to be upgraded to standard category after the specified period (Annexure-5) in terms of the current restructuring package, subject to satisfactory performance." The said master circular mandates that in case of restructured assets, its asset classification will be reckoned from the date it became NPA on the first occasion. The appellants, therefore, declared the account of the CD as NPA w.e.f. 26.08.2016. Thus, it is evident that the corporate guarantees were executed before declaration of account of the CD as NPA and, therefore, the timing and manner of the corporate guarantees could not be questioned on the ground that the CD and the holding company were already in default. 25. It is pertinent to note that in the communication dated 19.03.2019 sent by the counsel of the CD, it is stated that disclosures about the corporate guarantees have been made by the CD in their financial statements on an ongoing basis. In any case, mere non-disclosure of corporate guarantee in the financial statements of CD for financial years 2016-17 and 2017-18, can....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or the State on certain classes of instrument. It is not intended to be used as a weapon by a litigant to defeat the cause of the opponent^8. A Constitution Bench of this Court^9 has held that "Non stamping or improper stamping does not result in the instrument becoming invalid. The Stamp Act does not render such an instrument void. The non-payment of stamp duty is accurately characterized as a curable defect." Therefore, the contention that the corporate guarantees were not duly stamped as Stamp Duty under the Maharashtra Stamp Duty Act, 1958 was not paid is sans substance. 29. For the aforementioned reasons, issue no.(i) is answered in the affirmative where as issue no (ii) is answered in the negative. 30. It is well-settled legal proposition that this Court would not choose to re-appreciate a matter on facts when jurisdictional NCLT and in appeal NCLAT have recorded concurrent findings of fact. The exception to this self-imposed rule is where findings of fact are shown to be perverse^10. It is pertinent to note that NCLT had rejected the plea of respondents with regard to preferential transactions and fraud under Sections 43 and 66 of the Code respectively. Merely because ....