AI Drafter 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2026 (4) TMI 1741
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion under section 11B (1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 2. The appellant was registered in erstwhile service tax law under the category of 'Construction Service other than residential complex including commercial/industrial buildings or civil structure, renting of immovable property and works contract service'. The appellant in the present matter received some advances in the year 2012 for the services agreed to be provided by the appellant to its customers. The appellant duly paid the applicable service tax on the advances received by it to the Government exchequer. However, subsequently, before giving the possession to the buyer/customers, the project of the appellant was cancelled in 2015 and the appellant initiated the process of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....een considered in series of decisions by different learned Single Members, as referred above. The consistent view taken in all these decisions is that refund claim of service tax paid under the existing law (Central Excise Act, 1944) in respect of services not provided shall be disposed of under the existing law and has to be paid in cash, however such refund is subject to the provisions of sub-Section (2) of section 11B of CEA, which means that it is only in case of unjust enrichment that the refund amount can be denied. The refund application cannot be rejected on the ground of time bar under Section 11 B. The learned Single Member has taken support from the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ecified in the Finance Act, 1994 as amended from time to time then certainly the assessee is liable to pay, but when no such service has been provided then the assessee cannot be saddled with any such tax and in that case the amount deposited by the assessee with the exchequer will be considered as merely a 'deposit' and keeping of the said amount by the department is violative of Article 265 of the Constitution of India which specifically provides that "No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law." Since Service Tax, in issue, received by the concerned authority is not backed by any authority of law, the department has no authority to retain the same Buyer booked the flat with the appellant and paid some consider....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....session of the flat. Once the buyer cancelled the booking and the consideration for service was returned, the service contract got terminated and once it is established the no service is provided, then refund of tax for such service become admissible. The authorities below are not correct in their view that mere cancellation of booking of flats does not mean that there was no service. If the booking is cancelled and the money is returned to that buyer then where is the question of any service? Once it has been held that there is no service then by any stretch 'Point of Taxation Rules, 2011' can't be roped in as for the applicability of the said Rules firstly providing of any 'service' by the Appellant has to be establish....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....assessee may take the credit of such excess service tax paid by him, if the assessee.- (a) has refunded the payment or part thereof, so received for the service provided to the person from whom it was received; or (b) has issued a credit note for the value of the service not so provided to the person to whom such an invoice had been issued." There is no doubt that the appellant was entitled to the credit as the present case falls within the ambit of Rule 6 since the appellant had received the amount against the service to be provided, however, for the reason stated above, the same could not be provided by him, and the amount of invoice was to be returned back to the customers, the appellant therefore could have taken the credit of ....