2002 (5) TMI 102

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f law is involved and hence they are taken up together for disposal as per law. 2. The appellant had filed refund claim on the ground that additional customs duty under Section 3 of Customs Tariff Act is not leviable on the imported nylon fabrics equal to cess under the Textile Commodity Act, 1963 as also Additional Excise Duty (AED) under Goods of Special Importance Act, 1957. The appellate auth....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bric is not proper and according to the above act. They contend that AEC shall be levied on goods produced or manufactured in India. They contend that as the cess becomes not leviable, therefore AED have been imposed. 4. Ld. SDR points out that the issue is no longer res integra and the Tribunal had the occasion to the very products and reject the same in the case of CC v. Birla Jute Industries a....