Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2026 (4) TMI 248

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d by the Ld. CIT(A), deserves to be set-aside being illegal and inconsistent with the facts of the case. 2. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and facts of the case by confirming the impugned addition of Rs. 2,58,00,000/-, as the same has been made without pointing out any deficiency in the audited books of the appellant and its stock registers and other documents placed on record. 3. That the appellant respectfully craves leave to add alter omit or substitute any or all of the above grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of appeal to enable your good self to decide the appeal in accordance with law. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a partnership firm carrying on the busi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d the book results of the assessee, completed the assessment proceedings vide order dated 27.12.2019, passed u/s 143(3) of the Act, wherein addition of the total amount of cash deposited during demonetization period of Rs. 2,58,00,000/- was made u/s 68 of the Act. 5. Aggrieved by the above, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), Meerut, which was later on transferred to Ld. CIT(A), NFAC. During the course of the first appellate proceedings the submissions as made before the Ld. A.O. were reiterated. The appeal of the assessee was decided by the Ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 07.02.2024, wherein the order of the ld. AO was upheld and the appeal was dismissed. 6. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the audited book....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessee, as stated by the Ld. A.O. in his remand report has duly explained in the rejoinder to the remand report as filed before the Ld. CIT(A) during the course of the appeal proceedings. Copies of the remand report and rejoinder are placed at page nos. 163 to 167 and page nos, 168 to 170 of the paper book respectively. 11. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the finding of the Ld. A.O. and Ld. CIT(A) that there were no cash sales after demonetization period is factually incorrect as the assessee has made cash sales even after demonetization period. Month wise breakup of cash and credit sales as made by the assessee during the year under consideration is placed at page no. 34 of the paper book 12. The Ld. Counsel for th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT) 16. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the additions so made by the Id. AO and confirmed by the Id. CIT(A), are illegal and bad in as the same has only been made on the basis of whims and surmises, and nothing has been brought on record both by the Id. AO and the Ld. CIT(A) to disprove the assessees submissions. On the basis of the above documents/ explanations, it is prayed that the impugned addition so made by the ld. AO and confirmed by the ld. CIT(A), be deleted and the order of the Ld. CIT(A) be set aside. 17. On the other hand the Ld. DR strongly placed reliance on the orders of the authorities below. 18. Heard rival contentions, perused the orders of the authorities blow. We find considerable merit in the ....