Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2026 (4) TMI 262

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of assessment order dated 20.12.2022 of Ld. Assessing Officer/Assessment Unit (hereinafter referred as "the AO") u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144B of the Act for Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Private Ltd. Company, filed its return of income on 06.01.2022 declaring loss of Rs. 78,41,441/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS for the reason of larger payments to people who had not filed their Income Tax Returns. Notice u/s 143(2) dated 28.06.2022, Notices u/s 142(1) dated 23.09.2022, 12.10.2022, 19.10.2022, 07.11.2022 and 16.11.2022 and show cause notice dated 01.12.2022 were issued to the assessee. The assessee made part compliance. On completion of proceedings, Ld. AO vide order dated 20.12....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f appeal." 4. Ld. Departmental Representative submitted that Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 20,00,000/- being payment to Sanjay Kumar without correctly appreciating the facts of the case. Ld. AO had given cogent reasons. Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting addition of Rs. 2,68,17,674/- without appreciating that none of the vendors filed its reply and the assessee failed to establish the genuineness of the transactions/ actual receipt of service. Section 69C clearly was applicable as explanation offered by the assessee about the source of expenditure was not satisfactory. The findings of Ld. CIT(A) are factually incorrect. Ld. AO had given notices and made verifications. 5. Ld. Authorized Representative for respondent assess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to vendors' compliance, not assessee's source. (viii) CIT(A) (para 4.5.2 onwards) correctly held section 69C not applicable. (ix) Genuineness of Transactions Proved by the appellant by discharging its onus by providing: a. Copy of Agreement b. Copy of Ledger Account c. Copy of Invoices d. Confirmation from Vendor e. Purchase Order f. GSTR2A of the assessee g. TDS Returns h. Bank Payment details (x) It is not the case of the revenue that the expenses are incurred out of the Books so as to Attract 69C. (xi) AO has not produced any incriminating document to contradict the above but has only mechanically ignored the submissions o....