AI OCR 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
ITC on Pre-Fabricated Structure Purchased and Not Constructed
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....TC on Pre-Fabricated Structure Purchased and Not Constructed<br> Query (Issue) Started By: - Narayan Pujar Dated:- 3-4-2026 Last Reply Date:- 9-4-2026 Goods and Services Tax - GST<br>Got 4 Replies<br>GST<br>In one of the cases, the client has purchased an already existing pre-fabricated structure (HSN 9406) on an "as is where is" basis, without undertaking any structural modifications. As per S....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ection 17(5)(d), input tax credit is restricted in respect of goods or services used for construction of an immovable property. While there are several rulings disallowing ITC on pre-engineered buildings (PEB), such disallowance has typically been on the basis that the PEB was used in the course of constructing an immovable property. In the present case, can a distinction be drawn on the ground....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s that there is no construction activity involved, and the transaction pertains to the outright purchase of an already constructed and operational PEB? Accordingly, whether, in the absence of any construction activity, the restriction under Section 17(5)(d) would still apply and whether ITC can be availed in such circumstances? Reply By KALLESHAMURTHY MURTHY K.N.: The Reply: Sir, HSN-9406 ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....represents a pre-fabricated building structure - a civil structure - taxable at 18%. However, the query mentions that it was not constructed. So it can also be understood as movable property. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a pre-fabricated structure (PES) is movable in the case of M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. This case doesn't apply to all cases, since it is classified under HSN-9406. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Therefore, the eligibility for ITC on the pre-engineered structure (PES) depends on its intended use. The department may view it as ITC restricted u/s 17(5)(d). Please refer to the Advance Ruling of AAR, Gujarat, in the case of M/s. HMSU Rollers (India) Private Limited - 2025 (5) TMI 1100 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT, wherein it was held that ITC is not available. Reply By KASTURI....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... SETHI: The Reply: In this scenario, the activity of construction is present and ITC is hit by Section 17 (5)(d) of CGST Act. Reply By YAGAY andSUN: The Reply: Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017 restricts ITC in respect of goods or services received for construction of an immovable property (other than plant and machinery) on own account, even when used in the course or furtherance of b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....usiness. The statutory bar is thus activity-linked, i.e., it applies where inputs are used for construction. In the present case, the taxpayer has purchased a pre-fabricated structure (HSN 9406) on "as is where is" basis, without undertaking any further civil/structural activity. On facts, there is no construction undertaken by the recipient. Therefore, a tenable distinction arises that the inw....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ard supply is not "used for construction", but is an outright procurement of a completed asset. However, two aspects are determinative: (i) Nature of the asset - movable vs. immovable: If the pre-fabricated structure, as installed, is immovable property (i.e., attached to earth with permanence and not capable of being moved without substantial dismantling), authorities have often treated ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....such PEBs as immovable. In such cases, even in absence of fresh construction, the Department may contend that the restriction applies, as the asset partakes the character of immovable property and is capitalized as such. Adverse rulings on PEBs have generally proceeded on this characterization. Conversely, if it can be demonstrated that the structure is movable (modular, demountable, capable of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... relocation without material damage), it may fall outside the ambit of "immovable property", and consequently Section 17(5)(d) would not be attracted. (ii) "On own account" and nexus with construction: Given that no construction activity is carried out by the recipient, it can be argued that the goods are not used for construction on own account, but merely acquired as a ready asset. This su....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pports ITC eligibility, subject to the above characterization. Conclusion: A defensible position exists to claim ITC where (a) there is no construction activity by the recipient, and (b) the PEB can be substantiated as movable property. If, however, the structure is treated as immovable property upon installation, litigation risk remains high and the Department may invoke Section 17(5)(d) no....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....twithstanding the "as is where is" purchase. Robust documentation on movability, method of fixation, and accounting treatment will be critical. Reply By Shilpi Jain: The Reply: PEB generally are not immovable property and hence credit should not be blocked.<br> Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing ....