2026 (3) TMI 1619
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....UDDIN For the Petitioner: Mr. Karthik Ramana Puttamreddy, Learned Counsel. For the Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5: Mr. Swaroop Oorilla, Learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax. ORDER: Heard Mr. Karthik Ramana Puttamreddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax appearing for respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ession. The respondents have ignored crucial evidence filed by the petitioner in the form of declarations/confirmations issued by seven of its job work vendors confirming the fact that the concerned turnovers as appearing in their Ledgers and Books were pertaining to job work transactions only, but not in relation to an outright supply of goods. However, the 1st respondent has conveniently and del....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....12.12.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, submits that the matter may be remanded to the Assessing Officer to consider all objections and grounds giving fair opportunity to the petitioner in accordance with law. 4. Learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax has strongly objected to the maintainability of the writ petition. He has also sought to draw the attention of the C....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....case of M/s. A.S. Met Corp Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner (ST) (FAC) dated 06.10.2025. 5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and taken note of the grounds urged. We have also taken note of the materials placed from record by the rival parties. 6. The petitioner has a statutory remedy of appeal under Section 107(1) of TGST Act/CGST Act. The writ petition has been preferred ....
TaxTMI