Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2026 (3) TMI 294

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dvocate(s) for Respondent(s): Deputy Solicitor General of India, Y N Vivekananda. P.C. : As both these Writ Petitions raise an identical question of law, they are being disposed of, by way of this common order. 2. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Bezawada, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Y.N. Vivekananda, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. In W.P.No.8499 of 2024....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e refund of tax made to the petitioner was barred by Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules and that such refunds made, wrongfully, required to be recovered. 6. The petitioner being aggrieved by the said orders, had approached this Court, by way of the present Writ Petitions contending that Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules is unconstitutional and ultra vires the provision of Section 16 of the IGST Act apar....