2026 (3) TMI 212

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt : Shri M.S. Nagaraja, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. Anandalakshmi Ganeshram, Authorized Representative ORDER PER: SHRI P. DINESHA: This Appeal is filed against Order--in--Appeal No.198/2016 dated 24.02.2016 passed by Commissioner of Customs (Appeals--II), Chennai. 2. Heard Shri M.S. Nagaraja, Ld. Advocate for the Appellant and Ms. Anandalakshmi Ganeshram, Ld. Assistant Commis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... concluded that the Adjudicating Authority himself should have rectified the mistake since, admittedly, the excess of excise duty was paid at the insistence of the Revenue. However, the First Appellate Authority has, after setting aside the original order, directed the Adjudicating Authority to verify if the refund application filed by the Appellant was in time within the meaning of Section 27 of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to be accepted in the impugned order passed by the First Appellate Authority. Thus, according to us, the only fact which survived undisputed, was that there was an error in the computation of duty. This also has been the direction in the impugned order by the Commissioner, but however, in the order there is no mention nor is there any acknowledgement about the application filed by the Assessee in....