Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2026 (3) TMI 214

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i Radhakrishnan For the Respondent(s) : Mr.M.Santhanaraman Senior Panel Consel JUDGMENT DR. ANITA SUMANTH J.) Mr.M.Santhanaraman, learned Senior Panel Counsel accepts notice for the respondents and is armed with necessary instructions to enable a final disposal of this matter. Hence, by consent expressed by both learned counsel, final orders are passed in this Writ Appeal even at the s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....atutory remedy was by way of revision before the Central Government under Section 129DD of the Act. The order of the Cestat was not challenged and rightly so, as the Cestat is not a proper forum for the appellant to have approached. 4. The sequence of events assumes some importance in this matter. The original order of adjudication had been passed on 11.12.2023, as against which, the appellant ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al, in that, the appellant was suffering from cervical cancer. A perusal of the order of the Writ Court and the records placed before us does not indicate anywhere that the appellant had been diagnosed with cervical cancer. The Writ affidavit also does not say so. When probed, our attention is drawn to the medical records which indicate that the appellant was under treatment for Cervicitis and had....