Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (12) TMI 189

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed 16-7-1998 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), by which the Commissioner (Appeals) had set aside the duty demand of Rs. 29,508/- as not sustainable as there was no duty evasion. He had also noted in the order that the appellants had not filed the D-III intimation with regard to the receipt of rejected capacitors and has given categorical findings that there was no duty evasion by accepting the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....penalty. 3. The learned DR Shri S. Sudarsan reiterates the department's view. 4. On consideration of the submissions, I notice that the CCE (A) has accepted the explanation given by the appellants and has noted that there was no duty evasion and the question is only with regard to imposition of penalty. Therefore, Rule 173Q cannot be invoked in the present case. CCE (A) has also noted there ....