Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2026 (2) TMI 775

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appeals, with the consent of both sides, the same are hereby disposed of by this common order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, facts are borrowed from VATAP-64-2009. 2. The appellant-State through instant appeal under Section 68 of Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (for short '2005 Act') is seeking setting aside of order dated 17.11.2008 passed by VAT Tribunal, Punjab (for short 'Tribunal'). 3. In the morning of 02.01.2002, Excise and Taxation Officer (for short 'ETO') Patiala stopped vehicle bearing No.CH-01P-3908 suspecting evasion of tax payable under Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 (for short 'PGST'). The driver of the vehicle produced following documents:- i. Invoice-cum-delivery challan dated 31.12.2001 issue....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....detained by ETO after reporting by dealer at ICC. Had there been intention to evade payment of tax, there was no question to report at ICC. The moment goods are reported at ICC, dealer becomes liable to enter goods in the books of accounts and pay tax. The respondent did not charge tax in the regular assessment which indicates that there was no evasion of tax. The respondent was an American company and bulk of goods were cleared on 31.12.2001 i.e. last date of financial year. The respondent could arrange many trucks on 31.12.2001, however, 2-3 trucks could be arranged on 01.01.2001, thus, alteration with respect to GR and truck number was made in invoices. 8. Heard the arguments and perused the record. 9. The State has filed appeal un....