Rationalization of prosecution proceedings
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....irections of AO, etc. 2. Section 473 to 485 prescribe various offences on the part of assessee and form and manner of punishment and the conditions therein including time limitation, exceptions, threshold for amount of tax evaded and its punishment, punishment for subsequent offences, etc. 3. Section 473 deals with the contravention of order made under section 247(Search & Seizure) by the assessee in an attempt to derail the search proceedings and tamper with the evidence. At the same time, section 474 deals with the offence of not providing the necessary facility to inspect the books of account of other documents during search proceedings. Section 475 penalises the assessee in case of offence of removal, concealment, transfer or delivery....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Further, section 485 deals with second and subsequent offences. Section 494 deals with disclosure of particulars by public servants. 7. In this regard, it is proposed to amend Section 473 to 485 & 494 of the Act in light of continued exercise of decriminalisation and to make the punishment for the offences mentioned in these sections proportionate to the crimes. The principles that are followed in the proposed decriminalization exercise are as follows: (a) The nature of punishment is changed from rigorous imprisonment to simple imprisonment wherever prescribed in the sections mentioned above. (b) Maximum punishment is proposed to be limited to 2 years from its current 7 year and for the subsequent offences, it is reduced to 3 years fro....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....erson fails to pay the tax deducted at source or ensures the payment of such tax, in case of winnings from Lottery or crossword puzzle etc. as required under section 476(1)(b)(i) and if a person fails to pay and ensure payment of tax deducted at source in case of benefits or perquisite under section 476(1)(b)(ii) then the punishment for these offences is rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three months but which may extend to seven years, and with fine. These offences are proposed to be fully decriminalized. (ii) Further, in similar manner, if a person fails to pay tax deducted at source or ensure payment of tax in case of winnings from online games under section 476(1)(b)(i) and consideration from virtual digita....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....kh rupees but does not exceed fifty lakh rupees; (iii) with fine, in any other case.30 (f) In case of wilful attempt to evade tax, (i) In section 478(1), punishment for the offences as mentioned under section 478(1) is proposed to be changed in the manner given below: (a) with simple imprisonment for a term upto two years, or with fine, or with both, in a case where the amount sought to be evaded or tax on under-reported income exceeds fifty lakh rupees; (b) with simple imprisonment for a term upto six months, or with fine, or with both, in a case where the amount sought to be evaded or tax on under-reported income exceeds ten lakh rupees but does not exceed fifty lakh rupees; (c) with fine, in any other case. (ii) In section ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....case where the amount of tax, exceeds ten lakh rupees but does not exceed fifty lakh rupees; (c) with fine, in any other case. (i) In section 481, punishment for the offences mentioned under section 481 is proposed to be changed in the manner given below: (a) in the case where a person wilfully fails to produce, or cause to be produced, the accounts and documents as are referred to in the notice served on him under section 268(1) on or before the date specified in such notice, this provision under section 481 is proposed to be fully decriminalised. (b) in the case where a person wilfully fails to comply with a direction issued to him under section 268(5), the punishment is proposed to be changed from its current "rigorous imprisonme....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d as true, or which is wilfully attempted to be evaded, exceeds fifty lakh rupees; (ii) with simple imprisonment for a term upto six months, or with fine, or with both, in a case where the amount of tax, penalty or interest which would have been evaded, if the declaration, account or statement had been accepted as true, or which is wilfully attempted to be evaded, exceeds ten lakh rupees but does not exceed fifty lakh rupees; (iii) with fine, in any other case. (m) In section 485, punishment for the offences mentioned under section 485 is proposed to be changed from its current "rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to seven years, and with fine" to "simple imprisonment for a ter....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI