1960 (7) TMI 5
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ve of this court against a decision of the High Court of Mysore, by which it dismissed in limine an application by the appellants under article 226 of the Constitution for a writ of prohibition or some other appropriate writ against the Income-tax Officer, Bellari, Special Circle, Bangalore. The facts of the case are as follows. For the assessment year 1948-49, the appellants failed to file a re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er issued a further notice calling upon the appellants to appear before him, so that they might be given an opportunity of being heard. He also intimated that if no appearance was made, then he would proceed to determine the question of penalty, taking into consideration only the written statement which had been filed earlier. Before, however, the Income-tax Officer could decide the case, the appe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... affording to the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. This opportunity was denied to the appellants and, therefore, the order of the Income-tax Officer was vitiated by an illegality which supervened, not at the initial stage of the proceedings, but during the course of it. The order of the learned Appellate Assistant Commissioner pointed out the ground on which the illegality proceed....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... The reason given is, in our opinion, beside the point. What the Appellate Assistant Commissioner did was to vacate the order and direct refund of the penalty in view of an illegality which had occurred during the course of the assessment proceedings. On receipt of the record it was open to the Income-tax Officer to take up the matter from the point at which the illegality supervened and to correc....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI