2015 (4) TMI 1371

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....And Honourable Mr. Justice S.H. Vora For the Appellant(s) No. 1 : Mr. Nitin K Mehta, Advocate For the Opponent(s) No. 1 : Rule Unserved ORAL ORDER 1.00. All these Tax Appeals preferred by the revenue are of the year 2007. Even after a period of 8 years, the revenue is not able to serve the concerned respondent - assessee. Notices of admission issued upon the concerned respondent - asse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed 27/11/2014 the Department has failed to get the fresh address of the concerned assessee and has failed to serve the concerned assessee in the Appeals, which are of the year 2007 and 2009. At the request of Shri Manish Bhatt, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the revenue and in the larger interest that ultimately because of any lapse on the part of the Department, the revenue may not have ....