Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (11) TMI 1575

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ran Nambiar And Honourable Mr. Justice K. V. Jayakumar For the Appellants/Respondents : Adv. V.K. Shamsudheen, P. For the Respondent/Petitioner : Adv. K.N. Sreekumaran. JUDGMENT DR. A.K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J. This writ appeal has been preferred by the State, aggrieved by the judgment dated 03.07.2020 of a learned Single Judge in W.P(C).No.13257 of 2020. 2. The brief facts nece....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onsidered the writ petition, appears to have assumed that the case projected by the assessee was one of the assessment being barred by limitation. As there were other writ petitions that had been disposed by finding that a notice under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act had been issued beyond the period of limitation, based on the judgment of this Court in Baiju A.A. & Others v. State Tax Officer [2020....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....een passed beyond the period of limitation. 5. We have also heard Sri.K.N.Sreekumaran, the learned counsel for the writ petitioner/assessee. 6. On a consideration of the rival submissions, we find force in the submission of the learned Government Pleader, for we find that the assessment year in question is 2013-14 under the KVAT Act. The KVAT Act was amended in 2017, whereby the period of li....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n of the learned Single Judge that the writ petition came to be allowed on the ground of limitation. 7. As we have found that the limitation issue did not arise in the writ petition, we set aside the impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge and allow this appeal to that limited extent. While doing so, however, we take note of the main prayer in the writ petition preferred by the assessee, ....